Spermophorides Wunderlich, 1992
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.179534 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6243198 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CE87A4-FFE5-FFC0-FF67-DBF2FBD379B7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Spermophorides Wunderlich, 1992 |
status |
|
Spermophorides Wunderlich, 1992 View in CoL View at ENA
Spermophorides Wunderlich, 1992: 324 View in CoL –325
Diagnosis. A diagnosis that reliably covers all known representatives of this genus is beyond the scope of this paper and must await a revision or at least a large comparative study of the genus. The original diagnosis of the genus does not allow a distinction from several other small six-eyed pholcids, like Spermophora , Buitinga , Quamtana (part), Belisana , and others. The only character visible using untreated specimens and light microscopy that seems to reliably identify most Spermophorides species is the peculiar attachment site of the procursus to the cymbium, i.e. rather distal than proximal (see e.g., figs. 228, 243 in Wunderlich 1987; figure 229 in Wunderlich 1992; figs. 3, 11, 19, 27, 35, 41 in Senglet 1972; fig. 3 in Senglet 1973).
A further character that is easily accessible and that seems to separate most Spermophorides species from most other pholcids, is the relationship between tibia 1 length and metatarsus 1 length. Figure 75 View FIGURE 75 shows that in most pholcids with comparable tibia 1 lengths (~ 2.5–5.5 mm) the metatarsus 1 is significantly longer than the tibia 1. In Spermophorides , both leg segments are approximately the same length. Only a few species of the South American genus Chibchea fall among the Spermophorides species in the scatter in Figure 75 View FIGURE 75 . Remarkably, the Seychelles species ( S. lascars ) does not group with the other Spermophorides species (measurements according to fig. 64 in Saaristo 2001: tibia 1: 1,8; metatarsus 1: 2,2).
A distinctive character that seems to unite the Mediterranean, at least some Canary Island, and the Tanzanian species below requires clearing or SEM study of the epigynum: the pockets on the posterior epigynal plates. Senglet (1972) emphasized the importance of these pockets (his “alvéoles d’ancrage de la lèvre postérieure de l’épigyne”) for the identification of Mediterranean “ Spermophora ” (now Spermophorides ) species. They have not been described or illustrated for Canary Island species, but were found to be present in S. mercedes (Wunderlich) and an unidentified species from Lanzarote checked for this character (B. A. Huber, unpublished data).
Finally, the absence of male epiandrous spigots is very rare in pholcines (outside Spermophorides only known in Nyikoa limbe , see above), and has been verified in one Mediterranean species ( S. mediterranea [Senglet]), two Canary Island species ( S. cuneata [Wunderlich], S. mercedes ), and the Tanzanian species below (Figs. 68–70).
Relationships. As in previous analyses (e.g., Huber 2005), Spermophorides falls in a group of African genera including Buitinga (East Africa) and Paramicromerys ( Madagascar) , as well as some species tentatively assigned to Spermophora (East Africa, Madagascar, Comoros). All these taxa (clade 5 in Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A) share the loss of the “piriform gland spigots” on the ALS (Figs. 67, 73). More important than these intergeneric relationships are, in the present context, the data that support inclusion of the Tanzanian species below in a genus that was previously known only from the Canary Islands, the Mediterranean, and one species from the Seychelles. Three characters support this assignment: pair of pockets on the posterior epigynal plate ( Figs. 65, 66 View FIGURES 62 – 66 ; unique in pholcids), loss of epiandrous spigots (Fig. 68; in pholcines otherwise only known in Nyikoa limbe ), and the peculiar attachment site of the procursus to the cymbium (rather distal than proximal, similar only in Spermophora sangarawe , see fig. 235 in Huber 2003b). Whether the Seychelles species ( S. lascars Saaristo ) shares any of these characters is unknown.
Distribution. The genus was previously known from the Canary Islands (plus the Salvage Islands), southwestern Europe ( Spain, France, Corsica, Sardinia, Italy), and one uncertain species from the Seychelles. The new species below extends the known distribution to include mainland Africa.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Spermophorides Wunderlich, 1992
Huber, Bernhard A. 2007 |
Spermophorides
Wunderlich 1992: 324 |