Lathys subhumilis, Zhang, Zhi-Sheng, Hu, Dong-Sheng & Zhang, Yao-Guang, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.281616 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6167586 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CE0E1C-6306-6A07-E299-298362A1D937 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lathys subhumilis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Lathys subhumilis View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 9A–E View FIGURES 9 A – E , 10A–H View FIGURES 10 A – H , 11A–H View FIGURES 11 A – H , 14 View FIGURE 14
Type material. Holotype: male, China: Chongqing Municipality, Jinyun Mountain, 29°50ʹ30.5ʺN, 106°21ʹ31.1ʺE, Guankou, 28 April 2010, Z.X. Li, K.Y. Xu & L.Y. Wang leg. ( SWUC). Paratypes: 1 male and 3 females, same data as holotype ( SWUC); 4 males and 11 females, Guankou, 5 April 2010, Z.S. Zhang, Z.X. Li, K.Y. Xu & L.Y. Wang leg. ( SWUC); 3 females, Jinyun Mountain, Baizigou, 16–17 April 2010, Z.S. Zhang & Z.X. Li leg. ( SWUC); 1 female, Jinyun Mountain, Jinyun Temple, 26 April 2008, Z.S. Zhang leg. ( SWUC).
Etymology. The specific name refers to its similarity to L. humulis ; adjective.
Diagnosis. The new species is similar to L. humilis and L. nielseni , but distinguished by the long terminal part of conductor, the blunt patellar apophysis; the short, one-loop copulatory ducts and the small spermathecae ( Figs 9A–E View FIGURES 9 A – E , 10F–H View FIGURES 10 A – H , 11G–H View FIGURES 11 A – H ). The new species also differes from L. nielseni by the presence of white spots on the dorsum of opisthosoma.
Discription. Male total length 1.66–1.73. Holotype ( Figs 10A–E View FIGURES 10 A – H ) total length 1.66. Prosoma 0.80 long, 0.66 wide; opisthosoma 0.94 long, 0.74 wide. AME smallest, ALE and PLE largest. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.04, ALE 0.07, PME 0.06, PLE 0.07; AME–AME 0.02, AME–ALE 0.01, PME–PME 0.05, PME–PLE 0.05, ALE–PLE 0.02. MOA 0.16 long, front width 0.09, back width 0.17. Clypeus height 0.07. Both cheliceral margins with 4 teeth. Leg measurements: I 2.29 (0.76, 0.77, 0.49, 0.27); II 1.85 (0.58, 0.62, 0.40, 0.25); III 1.56 (0.49, 0.51, 0.34, 0.22); IV 1.78 (0.55, 0.60, 0.41, 0.22). Leg formula: 1243.
Male palp ( Figs 9A–C View FIGURES 9 A – E , 10F–H View FIGURES 10 A – H ) with a blunt distal patellar apophysis dorsally. Tibia with three apophyses surrounding the terminal part of conductor. Embolus indistinct. The terminal part of conductor with a relatively long and straight end.
Female total length 1.81–2.04. One of the female paratype ( Figs 11A–F View FIGURES 11 A – H ) total length 2.04. Prosoma 0.76 long, 0.61 wide; opisthosoma 1.35 long, 1.06 wide. AME smallest, ALE largest. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.04, ALE 0.07, PME 0.07, PLE 0.07; AME–AME 0.03, AME–ALE 0.01, PME–PME 0.05, PME–PLE 0.04, ALE–PLE 0.01. MOA 0.15 long, front width 0.08, back width 0.17. Clypeus height 0.05. Leg measurements: I 2.06 (0.62, 0.72, 0.44, 0.28); II 1.69 (0.53, 0.56, 0.35, 0.25); III 1.43 (0.45, 0.45, 0.32, 0.21); IV 1.82 (0.58, 0.63, 0.41, 0.20). Leg formula: 1423.
Epigyne ( Figs 9D–E View FIGURES 9 A – E , 11G–H View FIGURES 11 A – H ) with anteriorly located copulatory openings, which anterior and inner margin visible and semicircular. Copulatory ducts relatively short. Spermathecae small, spherical, located on the posterior and lateral side of copulatory ducts, with very wide interdistance.
Distribution. China (Chongqing) ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |