Rubus ulmifolius, Schott, 1818

Ferrer-Gallego, P. Pablo & Beek, Abraham Van De, 2024, After the conservation of Rubus ulmifolius (Rosaceae), Phytotaxa 677 (3), pp. 289-297 : 291

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.677.3.8

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87F2-FFAB-A169-E88F-FAB47119F781

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Rubus ulmifolius
status

 

3. Rubus ulmifolius View in CoL f. sancti-francisci A. Beek & P.P. Ferrer, nom. & stat. nov., pro R. inermis Pourret (1788: 326) .

Lectotype (designated by Van de Beek 1979: 206):—[ SPAIN]. Near Barcelona, s.d., Pourret 3168 ( MAF-POURR).

Other original specimens: BC code Salvador 3833, P barcode P 02521232.

Pourret (1788: 326) provided the famous St. Francis Blackberry with a scientific name. This bramble had been cultivated in gardens of Franciscan monasteries already long before the time of Pourret. Tournefort (1700: 614) already mentions this Ronce de Saint François. The locality that Pourret refers to, is Barcelona. Most probably it was collected in a monastery garden ( Ferrer-Gallego & Van de Beek 2021).

The results of sawing experiments brought to light that the descendants of Pourret’s taxon, the St. Francis blackberry, have prickles, and look like a normal R. ulmifolius . So it must be concluded that it belongs to the natural variability of that species. Because it is a well known form with a long tradition it seemed us desirable to provide it with a scientific name as a form of R. ulmifolius .

The epithet ‘ inermis ’ is not available on infraspecic level, because of the publication of R. ulmifolius var. inermis Focke (1914: 154) , based on R. inermis Willdenow (1809: 548) , which is a different taxon (see below). Monasterio-Huelin & Weber (1996) identify R. inermis Pourret with R. ulmifolius var. anoplothyrsus Sudre (1909: 70) . However, that variety is not identical with the St. Francis Blackberry. The only collection of Sudre, that he used for his description, is in his Batotheca Europaea, nr. 311. It has prickles on the primocane (as Sudre mentions) and only a part of the inflorescences lack prickles.

Because no other epithet is available, a new one had to be found. We chose ‘ sancti-francisci ’, after the popular name that has been used for the plant for centuries. The name is published here.

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Rosales

Family

Rosaceae

Genus

Rubus

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF