Drepanodus reclinatus ( Lindström, 1955a )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3853/j.0067-1975.63.2011.1586 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCEB77-FFC3-6361-FC06-FE029122F9B5 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Drepanodus reclinatus ( Lindström, 1955a ) |
status |
|
Drepanodus reclinatus ( Lindström, 1955a)
Fig. 11A–P View Figure 11
Acontiodus reclinatus Lindström, 1955a: 548 , text-fig. 3C, pl. 2, figs 5–6.
Drepanodus reclinatus (Lindström) .–Zhang, 1998c: 60–61, pl. 4, figs 12–14, 17–20 (cum syn.); Löfgren & Tolmacheva, 2003: 216–217, figs 5A–J, 7A–G (cum syn.); Ortega et al., 2007: fig. 6M; Ortega et al., 2008: fig.6.17–6.18.
Drepanodus arcuatus Pander. – Armstrong, 2000: 49, pl. 3, figs 1–18.
Drepanodus sp. A .–Zhen & Percival, 2004b: 159–160, partim, only fig. 3D, F–I; non fig. 3E = Protopanderodus .
Protopanderodus robustus (Hadding) .– An et al., 1983: 132, pl. 15, fig. 21; An & Zheng, 1990: pl. 6, figs 15–17; Chen & Bergström, 1995: partim only pl. 8, figs 3–4; Wang & Bergström, 1998: 342, partim only pl. 2, figs 7, 9.
Cornuodus longibasis (Lindström, 1955) .–Wang & Qi, 2001: pl. 1, fig. 11.
Paroistodus sp. An & Zheng, 1990: pl. 6, fig. 11.
Material. 116 specimens from 26 samples (see Tables 1–2).
Remarks. All seven elements (except for the Sd) recovered from Dawangou ( Fig. 11A–P View Figure 11 ) are identical with those illustrated by Löfgren & Tolmacheva (2003). Elements of D. reclinatus can be distinguished from D. arcuatus and other species of Drepanodus by being laterally costate.
Some specimens ascribed to Drepanodus sp. A from the Weemalla Formation (Darriwilian) of central New South Wales should be re-assigned to D. reclinatus representing the M (Zhen & Percival, 2004b, fig. 3D) and Pa (Zhen & Percival, 2004b, fig. 3F–I) elements. One figured specimen of D. sp. A (Zhen & Percival, 2004b, fig. 3E) represents an asymmetrical bicostate element of a Protopanderodus species , comparable to those described by Zhen & Percival (2004b, p. 172, fig. 11G–O) as Protopanderodus robustus ( Hadding, 1913) . However, P. robustus remains a poorly-known species, and may be more closely related to multicostate species rather than bicostate Protopanderodus species (see discussion under remarks of P. cooperi ). Specimens previously assigned to P. robustus by various authors may belong to D. reclinatus (see synonymy list; also Löfgren & Tolmacheva, 2003).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Drepanodus reclinatus ( Lindström, 1955a )
Zhen, Yong Yi 2011 |
Drepanodus arcuatus
Armstrong, H 2000: 49 |
Acontiodus reclinatus Lindström, 1955a: 548
Lindstrom, M 1955: 548 |