Eremobiotus alicatai (Binda, 1969)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-024-00657-8 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CA4178-9C7B-D772-FCB9-FC2C125AFA10 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Eremobiotus alicatai |
| status |
|
Redescription of Eremobiotus alicatai View in CoL
Species: Eremobiotus alicatai ( Binda, 1969) ( Figs. 3 - 5 View Fig View Fig , 7 - 10 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig ). Material examined
Holotype and paratypes of E. alicatai : 10 specimens; slide nos. 956, 957, 959–963, 1339, 1875, 2017.
Topotypic population of E. alicatai : 20 specimens; slide nos. 6023–6027, 6029, 6036, 6038–6039, 6046–6049, 6057, 6060, 6061. Three specimens; stub nos. DFG2-19, DFG2-20.
Population of E. alicatai from Orbetello (Grosseto): 11 specimens; slide nos. C3089 S1a_6062– V6 _6072.
Type depositories: Holotype and paratypes of E. alicatai are preserved in the University of Catania, in the Pilato and Binda collection. Eighteen specimens of the topotypic population are preserved in the University of Catania, Pilato and Binda collection, while two are in the University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Bertolani collection. Specimens of the topotypic population which are mounted on SEM stub are preserved at the University of Catania (stub nos. DFG2-19, DFG2-20) in the Pilato and Binda collection. Samples of moss from which the additional specimens of E. alicatai were extracted are dry preserved in the University of Catania (sample UNICT-DFG 2) and University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (sample C3089).
Description
Body whitish, eyespots absent. Dorsal and ventral cuticle with wrinkles (with PCM visible in exuviae and very rarely in specimens; well visible with SEM) almost invisible; cuticular pores absent. Distal portion of the buccal ring with internal septa ( Fig. 3a View Fig ), which with PCM could give the impression of the presence of papular lamellae. Six peribuccal lobes visible with SEM (Fig. 4a, b); the oral cavity armature of Isohypsibius type, showing a single band with two to five rows of teeth visible only with SEM (Fig. 4a). Bucco-pharyngeal apparatus of Isohypsibius type; the AISM of the Isohypsibius - type; apophyses and two macroplacoids (length sequence 1> 2) in the pharynx, the first of which showing a central constriction (Fig. 4b, d); microplacoid and septulum absent. cuticular thickening at the base of the lunula; asterisks indicate some claws with angles between primary and secondary branch visibly narrower than 180°. Scale bars: 10 μm
Internal claws of legs I–III of modified Isohypsibius - type; the angle between the primary and secondary branches is very wide (ca. 160–180°) but the basal section of the claw and the insertion of the primary branch on the secondary branch still recognizable; secondary branch short, primary branch with very small and symmetrical accessory points ( Fig. 7b, d View Fig ); distance between the insertion point of the main branch and the claw base very short; lunules at the base of the claws present with very small teeth almost impossible to observe with PCM ( Fig. 7c View Fig ) but visible with SEM ( Fig. 7b, d View Fig ). External claws of legs I–III of Isohypsibius - type, having a lesser wide angle between primary and secondary branches (ca. 130°), secondary branch short, primary branch with very small and symmetrical accessory points ( Fig. 7b, c View Fig ). A long and irregular singular cuticular thickening (single indented bar) develops from the lunula of the internal claws of legs I–III ( Figs. 7a, c, d View Fig and 9c View Fig ), with thick and evidently indented external margins, which teeth are positioned on the external cuticle ( Fig. 7d View Fig ). Anterior and posterior claws IV of Eremobiotus - type, with primary and secondary branches fused forming a relatively long common triangular tract. The angle between primary and secondary branches very wide (ca. 170–180°); primary branches with thick and asymmetrical (with respect to the main axis of the primary branch) accessory points, giving the impression, with PCM, of a primary branch with a secondary point pointing upwards ( Figs. 9d View Fig and 10 View Fig ); claw bases with small indented lunules which often present supernumerary small teeth ( Fig. 10a–c, e, f View Fig ). A cuticular thickening present at the base of the lunulae of claw IV, bigger in anterior claws and smaller and slightly visible in posterior claws ( Figs. 5a–e View Fig and proposed here for the Eremobiotus - type claws (i.e., the fourth pair of claws in Eremobiotus species). c Posterior claws. d Anterior claws. sb, secondary branch; pb, primary branch; cb, claw base; bd, distance between branches
10a, c). A furbelow structure present on all legs (i.e., an area surrounding the claws with fine but very dense granulation, visible with SEM ( Figs. 7b, d View Fig , 8a View Fig , and 10e View Fig ) and, partially with PCM ( Fig. 10a, c View Fig ). Eggs smooth laid in the exuviae.
Remarks
Binda (1969) reported the presence of cuticular pores (“cuticola cosparsa di perle,” meaning “cuticle sprinkled with pores”); however, our analysis of types through LM, and analysis of the two investigated populations of E. alicatai through LM and SEM, revealed the absence of cuticular pores .
Differential diagnosis
Given that the main characters to differentiate E. alicatai from E. ginevrae are not constant and well visible in all specimens of the former species (indentation of the lunulae of the legs I–III), the two species differs only in the dimension and indentation of the lunulae of the IV pair of legs and in morphometric characters.
Eremobiotus alicatai differs from E. ginevrae in having bigger lunulae of the fourth pair of legs; those have a well-developed indentation in E. alicatai while they are only slightly indented in E. ginevrae .
The species are also differentiated based on certain morphometric traits ( Tables 2, 3, 4, and 5; see also remarks paragraph of E. ginevrae ).
Eremobiotus alicatai differs from E. ovezovae by different dimension and shape of claws on all legs (i.e., bigger and more slender in E. alicatai ); the external claws of legs I–III more closely resemble Isohypsibius - type claws, whereas in E. ovezovae , all claws more closely resemble Eremobiotus - type claws. The species differ also in morphometric characters ( pt of all claws).
arrowheads indicate a well-developed single, indented cuticular bar. White indented arrowheads indicate short accessory points; white arrowheads indicate the furbelow-like structure; black arrowheads indicate the poorly indented lunula of the internal ( c, d) and external ( b) claws. ( a, c, PCM; b, d, SEM). Scale bars: 10 μm
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
