Megaphyllum rosenauense (Verhoeff, 1897)

Lazányi, Eszter & Vagalinski, Boyan, 2013, Redefinition of the millipede subgenus Megaphyllum sensu stricto Verhoeff, 1894 and neotype designation for Megaphyllum austriacum (Latzel, 1884) (Myriapoda: Diplopoda: Julida: Julidae), Zootaxa 3741 (1), pp. 55-100 : 79-80

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3741.1.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BF5EA9B8-C6F4-448A-BEF9-1976AB4EC308

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6151734

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C887D3-FFE1-FFAE-FF34-986AFD98AE29

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Megaphyllum rosenauense (Verhoeff, 1897)
status

 

Megaphyllum rosenauense (Verhoeff, 1897) View in CoL

Figs 13a–f View FIGURES 13 a – f

Brachyiulus rosenauensis Verhoeff, 1897 : Verhoeff 1897b: 108–109. Chromatoiulus rosenauensis: Attems 1927: 223 , 235, Figs 315–317. Chromatoiulus (Chromatoiulus) rosenauensis: Attems 1940: 306 . Megaphyllum rosenauense: Enghoff & Kime 2009 .

Material examined. Romania: ZMB 2622, 2♂, 2♀, Syntypen, Siebenbürgen [Transylvania], leg. Verhoeff (MNB); ZMB 12974b, 1♂ Syntypus (Nr. 1248 Coll. Verhoeff), gonopods, slide preparation, Sinaia (MNB); Nr. 1243 Coll. Verhoeff, 1♂, gonopods, slide preparation, Borszeg (MNB); 2♂, Siebenbürgen [Transylvania], III.3.134, det. Verhoeff (HNHM); 1♂, Romania, Hargita County, Csíkszereda [Miercurea Ciuc], Hosszúaszó, 890m, spruce forest, 1998. VII.02., leg. Merkl O. (HNHM).

Distribution. Republic of Moldova: Bălţi: Corneşti; Chişinau: Scoreni; Tighina: Rezeni, Zloţi; Soroca: Mandac (Jawłowski 1930); Brǎseu, Bǎrnova (Jawłowski 1935); Romania: Râşnov (type locality) (Verhoeff 1897b) Podu Olt (Ceuca et al. 1983); Făgăraş (Gava 2004); Ukraine: Ternopol Region (Chornyi & Golovatch 1993)

Diagnosis. Differs from all consubgeners by the reddish legs of males together with sexual dimorphism in body colour, by the bulging, enlarged promere and by the significantly tapering posterior opisthomere process (pp), which is much shorter than the solenomere ( Figs 13a–b, 13d View FIGURES 13 a – f ).

Promere (P) ( Figs 13a–c View FIGURES 13 a – f ) bulging, posteriorly with an enlarged lobe (l) almost covering the opisthomere from posterior direction. Opisthomere’s ( Figs 13a–b, 13d View FIGURES 13 a – f ) posterior process (pp) significantly tapering and apically very pointed, much shorter than the solenomere. Posterior solenomere process (psp) bent anteriorly.

This species shows true sexual dimorphism in body coloration: males are dark grey with slightly reddish legs; females have two bright longitudinal dorsal bands like M. projectum (Verhoeff 1897a) . Body length and height: males: 39.7–47.5mm, 2.8–3.4mm (34mm and 2.67mm according to Verhoeff 1897); females: 33mm, 3.5mm (Verhoeff 1897).

Remarks. Female vulva is unknown.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Diplopoda

Order

Julida

Family

Julidae

Genus

Megaphyllum

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF