Nymphocixia (Fennah, 1971)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ABB2811D-36C8-4A21-AEDA-394FC44FA524 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6533262 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C687FB-FFAF-A173-8EFB-FAD2B202F828 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nymphocixia |
status |
|
Status of Nymphocixia View in CoL View at ENA and Nymphomyndus
Nymphocixia unipunctata View in CoL ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ) was described from Mexico (Isla Espíritu Santo, Gulf of California; Van Duzee 1923) with the genus established to accommodate the species due to characteristics of the head compared to Oecleus View in CoL (greatly elevated lateral carinae of vertex with vertex hiding the pronotum). Nymphomyndus caribbea View in CoL ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ) was originally described as Nymphocixia ( Fennah 1971) View in CoL , however, Emeljanov (2007) established Nymphomyndus View in CoL for N. caribbea View in CoL based on differences in the head. Emeljanov (2007) discussed Nymphocixia View in CoL in comparison with his new genus Nymphomyndus View in CoL (and the monobasic genus Nesomyndus Jacobi View in CoL from Madagascar), but provided little for diagnostic comparisons among genera. The key diagnostic differences between the genera appear to be that in Nymphomyndus View in CoL the lateral margins of the vertex (dorsal view) are anteriorly converging (parallel in Nymphocixia View in CoL ), the posterior margin of the vertex does not entirely overlap the pronotum (posterior margin of vertex overlapping in Nymphocixia View in CoL ) and in lateral view, anterior profile of head “almost straight in distal three-quarters” (quoting Emeljanov (2007: 292) from Fennah (1971: 313) (versus smoothly rounding in Nymphocixia View in CoL ) ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 ).
The level of variability between Nymphocixia View in CoL and Nymphomyndus View in CoL for 18S is significantly less than what was observed among other genera, indicating that the separation into these two genera was not warranted. Because the features listed by (Van Duzee as indicative of Nymphocixia View in CoL are present in Nymphomyndus caribbea View in CoL , lack of strong characters to merit the establishment of Nymphomyndus View in CoL as a distinct genus, and strong molecular support that Nymphocixia View in CoL and Nymphomyndus View in CoL are closely related, we here synonymize Nymphomyndus View in CoL under Nymphocixia View in CoL , with the composition of Nymphocixia View in CoL as follows.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Nymphocixia
Barrantes Barrantes, Edwin A., Zumbado Echavarria, Marco A., Bartlett, Charles R., Helmick, Ericka E. & Bahder, Brian W. 2022 |
Nymphomyndus
Emeljanov 2007 |
Nymphomyndus
Emeljanov 2007 |
Nymphomyndus
Emeljanov 2007 |
Nymphomyndus
Emeljanov 2007 |
Nymphomyndus
Emeljanov 2007 |
Nymphomyndus
Emeljanov 2007 |
Nymphomyndus
Emeljanov 2007 |
Nymphocixia unipunctata
Van Duzee 1923 |
Nesomyndus
Jacobi 1917 |
Oecleus
Stal 1862 |