Parurgonina valanginiana, SCHLAGINTWEIT & YAZDI-MOGHADAM & GRANIER & HOSSEINZADEH, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.35463/j.apr.2024.01.03 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C587AF-FFBC-623C-FC4A-F92A0657FF6A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Parurgonina valanginiana |
status |
sp. nov. |
Parurgonina valanginiana View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs. 4c View Fig 4 , 5 - 6 View Fig 5 View Fig
1994 Pseudochrysalidina arabicus Henson – Shakib, pl. 7.3, fig. 10.
2011 Valdanchella – Jamalian et al., fig. 7n, fig. 12a - c. 2016 Falsurgonina pileola – Hosseini et al., fig. 7d - f. 2016 Falsurgonina pileola – Hosseini et al., fig. 7d - f. 2020 Pseudochrysalidina arabica – Esrafili-Dizaji et al., fig. 6A.
Origin of the name: Referring to the Valanginian stage.
Horizon and locality: Valanginian carbonates of the Fahliyan Formation from the Kuh-e Siah section ( Figs. 1- 2 View Fig View Fig ).
Holotype: Slightly oblique axial section shown in fig. 5e; sample RAP 10825.
Urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: 8A51E8E5-3889-4399-A934- 1C5B2820CB0A
Description: Test high-conical with almost plane or convex base, starting with a comparably large embryonic chamber (protoconch) which is situated in a (sub)apical position ( Fig. 5 View Fig 5 a-d). It is followed by a second, also comparatively large, hemispherical to lunular to hemispherical chamber laterally attached to the former ( Fig. 5 View Fig 5 a-e) (= deuteroconch in Cuvillier et al., 1968, p. 150). Both chambers are connected by a single pore ( Fig. 5a View Fig 5 ). These in turn are followed by a short trochospiral (‘helicospiral’) early stage with numerous chambers that apparently lack endoskeletal pillars.
Adult stage is rectilinear with up to 16 chambers and oblique stolon systems ( Fig. 6a, c View Fig ). The marginal chamber part is undivided (e.g. Figs. 5g, 5i View Fig 5 ). The main central part is occupied by irregular distributed pillars showing a typical semi-lunular shape in transverse sections ( Fig. 5i, 5k and 5m View Fig 5 above) [= section courbée en forme de crochet (curved section forming a hook) Schroeder in Schroeder et al., 1975, p. 324]. As can be discerned in axial sections, the pillars are not aligned between subsequent chambers; instead they are more or less alternately arranged (e.g., Fig. 5e View Fig 5 , 6a, 6c View Fig ). They broaden (partly also fused) at the base (= pointed towards the cone base). The foramina are represented by multiple large pores irregularly piercing the septa and are linked to the lunular pillars in the central part ( Fig. 5 View Fig 5 i-j, 5l). In axial sections, the foramina are arranged in oblique lines between subsequent chambers (= perforations obliques, Cuvillier et al., 1968) ( Fig. 6a, c View Fig , adult part). Obliquely arranged marginal foramina are present in the adult rectilinear test part ( Fig. 5e, n View Fig 5 ). The wall is thick with pseudo-keriothecal texture ( Gusič, 1969; Schroeder in Schroeder et al., 1975), a feature barely discernible in the Iranian specimens.
Dimensions: See Table 1.
Tabel 1. Biometric data of Upper Jurassic P. caeliensis (Cuvillier et al.) and lowermost Cretaceous P. valanginiana sp. nov. compared. * Cuvillier et al. (1968) ** Pleş et al. (2015) *** Gušić (1969 for Lituonella dinarica ) **** measured from Schroeder et al. (1975, pl. 1, fig. 2).
Remarks: Parurgonina displays a discontinuous fossil record including Parurgonina primaeva Kamoun & Peybernès 1993 from the Middle Jurassic (upper Bajocian–lower Bathonian) to the Upper Jurassic P. caelinensis (uppermost Oxfordian–lowermost Tithonian, Bassoullet, 1997a; Pleş et al., 2015, 2019). In fact, the only difference between the Upper Jurassic specimens and those from the Iranian Fahliyan Formation that we could observe is the comparably large embryonic chamber(s) at the apex (Tab. 1). According to literature data, the diameter of the megalospheric embryo for P. primaeva is 0.200 mm and 0.110 -0.160 mm for Upper Jurassic specimens of P. caelinensis . The large-sized embryo of the Lower Cretaceous specimens reaches up to 0.22 mm in size.
As remarked by Cuvillier et al. (1968), Parurgonina may be confused with the gross homeomorphic Paravalvulina (ex. Dukhania ) arabica ( Henson, 1948) described from the ‘Infravalanginian’ limestones and shales containing Pseudocyclammina lituus of subsurface Qatar (Dhukan wells), later erroneously assigned to the Hauterivian by Banner et al. (1991) and Whittaker et al. (1998) (see next chapter for biostratigraphic remarks on genuine Pseudocyclammina lituus ). As indicated by Banner et al. (1991), P. arabica has a quadriserial (juvenile) to triserial growth (adult), lacks a pseudo-keriothecal wall, the pillars are not triangular in axial sections ( Banner et al., 1991, figs. 98, 102-104; Schroeder et al., 1975, pl. 2, fig. 1) and do not display the typical semi-lunular shape in transverse sections (e.g., fig. 4i, k). Moreover, the multiple foramina in the adult part of the central zone of P. arabica appear predominantly perpendicular to the septa ( Banner et al., 1991, figs. 99, 102-104), while crosswise oblique in P. valanginiana . Another difference is that P. valanginiana does not show a marginal thickening of the chamber. Therefore, the chamber height remains more or less constant from the marginal to central test area as remarked by Gušić (1969, p. 69).
Like Barkerina dobrogiaca ( Neagu 2000) or Valdanchella miliani ( Schroeder 1968) in the middle and western parts of Neotethys, P. valanginiana might represent a Valanginian marker taxon endemic to the Arabian Plate.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.