Stenolysmus Kimmins, 1940
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4581.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20A9776D-AE5F-41BC-A35B-0C5E42EDFE48 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5631501 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C47176-FFC8-8D79-7AD2-0146FD6C9516 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2019-04-09 10:09:47, last updated 2024-11-25 23:51:36) |
scientific name |
Stenolysmus Kimmins, 1940 |
status |
|
Stenolysmus Kimmins, 1940 View in CoL View at ENA
( Figs 57–59 View FIGURE 57 View FIGURE 58 View FIGURE 59 )
Type species. Nymphes extranea Walker, 1853: 230 (by original designation).
Diagnosis. Antennae elongate, ca. FW length; female forecoxa without pedicellate setae, anteroventral process absent; wings elongate, narrowly ovoid, hyaline with dark venation and pale pterostigma; costal area relatively narrow; FW stem of RP relatively short, RP1 originating close to origin of RP; RP branches weakly sinuous distally in both wings; end-twigging mostly irregular and multi-layered along posterior margin of wings; FW M fork just beyond midpoint of wing, MA and MP dichotomously or pectinately branched, M fork sometimes obscured as MP may be fused to CuA distally (when this occurs there is an apparent oblique ‘ m-cua crossvein’ (inset in Fig. 58 View FIGURE 58 )); female with all FW veins regular, not incrassate; FW CuA and CuP not strongly arched towards posterior wing margin distally; A2 elongate, terminating more or less level with origin of RP1; male tergites 8 and 9 and ectoprocts mostly fused; ectoproct apically rounded; gonarcus large and subtriangular, lobed dorsally, anterior apodemes absent; entoprocessus short, broadly rounded; female sternite 7 with posteroapical corners produced; sternite 8 concave with rounded posterolateral processes with setal pile; gonapophysis 9 broadly lobed and truncate with internal sculpturing; gonocoxites 9 with distinct posteroventral fringe with stout hooked setae.
Comments. Stenolysmus extraneus is bright orange when living, and along with the unusual wing venation, was likely the reason for the original placement in Nymphes Leach by Walker (1853), a nymphid genus where many species are also bright orange in colour. Indeed, S. extraneus has been placed by various authors in Osmylidae (i.e., Osmylus sensu lato and Stenosmylus ) and Nymphidae (i.e., Nymphes , Myiodactylus Brauer ) (e.g., Walker 1853; Hagen 1866; McLachlan, 1867; Banks 1913). The unusual ‘oblique m-cua crossvein’ in the forewing of some individuals of various genera of Stenosmylinae , including some individuals of S. extraneus has created some confusion regarding the identity and homology of certain wing veins ( New, 1986; Cousins & Béthoux, 2015). New (1986) and Cousins & Béthoux (2015) studied the forewings of various genera of Stenosmylinae and proposed that the oblique crossvein in the forewing of some individuals represented a fusion of MP (as MP2) with CuA. Following the method of identifying wing veins in lacewings used recently by Breitkreuz et al. (2017) we examined the wing tracheation of different individuals of S. extraneus without ( Fig. 59 View FIGURE 59 ) and with ( Fig. 59 View FIGURE 59 , inset) the ‘oblique m-cua crossvein’ to identify veins and their points of apparent fusion. The forewing tracheation of both forms of S. extraneus clearly show that the oblique vein is indeed the stem of MP which fuses with CuA for a short length, and then separates again, supporting the contention that the oblique vein is the stem of MP and not a crossvein ( New, 1986; Cousins & Béthoux, 2015).
Banks, N. (1913) Synopses and descriptions of exotic Neuroptera. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 39, 201 - 242.
Breitkreuz, L. C. V., Winterton, S. L. & Engel, M. S. (2017) Wing Tracheation in Chrysopidae and other Neuroptera (Insecta): A resolution of the confusion about vein fusion. American Museum Novitates, 3890, 1 - 44. https: // doi. org / 10.1206 / 3890.1
Cousin, G. & Bethoux, O. (2015) The steps towards and inconspicuous vein fusion documented in Stenosmylinae forewings (Neuroptera: Osmylidae). Organisms Diversity and Evolution, 16, 225 - 232. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 13127 - 015 - 0242 - 6
Kimmins, D. E. (1940) A revision of the osmylid subfamilies Stenosmylinae and Kalosmylinae (Neuroptera). Novitates Zoologicae, 42, 165 - 201.
McLachlan, R. (1867) [1868] New genera and species, & c., of neuropterous insects; and a revision of Mr. F. Walker's British Museum Catalogue of Neuroptera, part ii. (1853), as far as the end of the genus Myrmeleon. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 9, 230 - 281. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1096 - 3642.1867. tb 00195. x
New, T. R. (1986 a) A new Australian genus of Stenosmylinae (Neuroptera: Osmylidae). Systematic Entomology, 11, 447 - 452. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1365 - 3113.1986. tb 00537. x
Walker, F. (1853) List of the specimens of neuropterous insects in the collection of the British Museum. Part II. - (Sialides- Nemopterides). British Museum, London, 283 pp. [pp. 193 - 476]
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Stenosmylinae |
1 (by plazi, 2019-04-09 10:09:47)
2 (by ImsDioSync, 2019-04-09 10:24:50)
3 (by ImsDioSync, 2019-04-17 21:03:40)
4 (by ImsDioSync, 2019-04-17 21:12:22)
5 (by ImsDioSync, 2019-04-18 00:22:46)
6 (by ImsDioSync, 2019-04-18 00:32:20)
7 (by ImsDioSync, 2019-04-18 00:37:02)
8 (by ImsDioSync, 2019-07-24 12:20:05)
9 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-09-25 22:56:06)
10 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-10-29 03:16:42)
11 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-10-29 10:00:59)
12 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-10-31 07:29:24)
13 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-10-31 07:29:24)
14 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-10-31 07:29:24)
15 (by plazi, 2023-10-30 13:09:19)