Nilionympha Ren & Engel, 2007

Winterton, Shaun L., Martins, Caleb Califre, Makarkin, Vladimir, Ardila-Camacho, Adrian & Wang, Yongjie, 2019, Lance lacewings of the world (Neuroptera: Archeosmylidae, Osmylidae, Saucrosmylidae): review of living and fossil genera, Zootaxa 4581 (1), pp. 1-99 : 22

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4581.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20A9776D-AE5F-41BC-A35B-0C5E42EDFE48

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C47176-FF96-8D21-7AD2-0355FCB495BA

treatment provided by

Plazi (2019-04-09 10:09:47, last updated 2024-11-25 23:51:36)

scientific name

Nilionympha Ren & Engel, 2007
status

 

Nilionympha Ren & Engel, 2007 View in CoL

( Fig. 7E View FIGURE 7 )

Type species. Nilionympha pulchella Ren & Engel, 2007: 216 (by original designation).

Diagnosis. Wings relatively short and broad, apices slightly rounded; FW costal area narrow, subcostal veinlets widely spaced basally, denser distally, pterostigma relatively broad; FW RP1 originating relatively distant to origin of RP; both wings with numerous regular crossveins, outer gradate series absent; both wings with MA and MP with few irregular pectinate/dichotomous branches, MP area larger than MA; FW CuA irregularly dichotomously to pectinately branched, HW CuA more strongly pectinate and larger in area, with occasional end-twigging; FW CuP pectinately branched, HW CuP short, simple.

Comments. Nilionympha was originally described based on incomplete specimens of N. pulchella and N. imperfecta Ren & Engel , 200). Li et al. (2018) recently revised the genus and transferred N. imperfecta to Enodinympha after a reappraisal of the type specimen and description of the forewing. Unfortunately, the hind wing venation of both Nilionympha and Enodinympha was misinterpreted by both Ren & Engel (2007) and Li et al. (2018), specifically the identity of the posterior veins. In both cases RP1 was misinterpreted as MA, MP as CuA, CuA as CuP. Indeed, their interpretation would actually preclude placement in Gumillinae as an interpretation of an elongate and pectinately branched CuP in the hind wing would place both genera in subfamilies such as Stenosmylinae . We identify the hind wing CuP as a short, simple vein basal to the elongate and pectinately branched CuA, which taken into consideration with characters such as the wing cell arrangement and highly elongate antennae, Enodinympha and Nilionympha clearly both belong to Gumillinae .

Included species.

N. pulchella Ren & Engel, 2007 ( China) View in CoL (Middle Jurassic)

N. shantouensis Li et al., 2018 ( China) View in CoL (Middle Jurassic)

Li, Q., Ren, D. & Wang, Y. (2018) Revision of the gumilline genus Nilionympha with a new species from the Middle Jurassic of China (Neuroptera: Osmylidae). Zootaxa, 4399 (1), 146 - 150. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4399.1.13

Ren, D. & Engel, M. S. (2007) A split-footed lacewing and two epiosmylines from the Jurassic of China (Neuroptera). Annales Zoologici, 57, 211 - 219.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 7. Gumillinae fossils. A. Allotriosmylus uniramosus Yang et al. (from Yang et al., 2010); B. Epiosmylus panfilovi Ren & Yin (from Ren & Yin, 2002); C. Enodinympha translucida Ren & Engel (forewing); D. Nuddsia longiantennata Menon & Makarkin (from Menon & Makarkin, 2008); E. Nilionympha pulchella Ren & Engel (from Ren & Engel, 2007); F. Tenuosmylus brevineurus Wang et al. (from Wang et al., 2009b) (figures not to scale).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Neuroptera

Family

Osmylidae

SubFamily

Gumillinae