Chainodictyon minor Ulrich, 1890
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26879/1174 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A4A07D50-3DDB-4E45-A255-1ECCF45F147A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11032558 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C387F1-9A0D-3969-2EB4-06D6F6914B76 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Chainodictyon minor Ulrich, 1890 |
status |
|
Chainodictyon minor Ulrich, 1890 View in CoL
Figures 9 View FIGURE 9 C-G, 10A; Appendix
1890 Chainodictyon laxum var. minor Ulrich , p. 640, pl. 62, figs. 3-3a.
Material. SNSB-BSPG 2020 XCI 37, SNSB-BSPG 2020 XCI 38, SNSB-BSPG 2020 XCI 42, SNSB-BSPG 2020 XCI 106, SNSB-BSPG 2020XCI 125.
Description. Reticulate colonies formed by anastomosing branches. Branches frequently bifurcating, flattened, bearing 2–4 alternating rows of autozooecia; dorsal wall rugose, 0.30–0.79 mm wide. Fenestrules elongate, rounded-polygonal, 0.65–1.10 mm wide, and 1.26–1.90 mm long. Autozooecial apertures oval. Diaphragms not observed. Hemisepta absent. Styles absent. Leptozooecia common to abundant, small, occurring between autozooecia on the obverse side of branches. Autozooecial walls in endozone 0.013 – 0.020 mm thick, hyaline; finely laminated in exozone.
Remarks. Chainodictyon minor Ulrich, 1890 , differs from C. laxum Foerste, 1887 , in having a smaller size of fenestrules (fenestrule width 0.65– 1.10 mm vs. ca. 1.3 mm in C. laxum ; fenestrule length 1.26–1.90 mm vs. 2.5 mm in C. laxum ). Chainodictyon minor differs from C. angustum Schulga-Nesterenko, 1952 , from the Lower Permian (Asselian) of Russia in having smaller fenestrules (fenestrule width 0.65–1.10 mm vs. 1.2–2.0 mm in C. angustum ; fenestrule length 1.26–1.90 mm vs. 3.6–4.1 mm in C. angustum ).
Occurrence. Pennsylvanian; USA, Illinois. Graham Formation, Pennsylvanian (Virgilian); TXV-200 (“Spillway section at Lost Creek Lake”), Texas, USA.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |