Neidium lavoieanum, Hamilton & Savoie & Sayre & Skibbe & Zimmermann & Bull, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.419.1.3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C287B7-0529-F10F-FF7A-FF02A9C8B7AC |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Neidium lavoieanum |
status |
sp. nov. |
Neidium lavoieanum sp. nov. Figs 69–82 View FIGURES 69–74 View FIGURES 75–78 View FIGURES 79–82
Individuals examined for morphological analyses: n = 27, examined for molecular analysis: n = 1.
Valves linear to linear-elliptic with capitate apices ( Figs 69–74 View FIGURES 69–74 ). Valve length 58–70 μm, width 14.–15.0 μm. Striae mildly oblique throughout, 20–22 in 10 μm. Areolae elliptical, 15–18 in 10 μm. Voigt faults on secondary side of valve. Central area transapically expanded, covering ½ to ¾ valve width. Axial area linear to linear elliptic from mid-valve to apex. In LM, raphe filiform and linear-elliptical. One longitudinal canal present along each margin. Central raphe ends deflected extending ½ to ¾ across central area. Terminal ends forming bifurcate lacinia.
In SEM external view, proximal raphe ends deflected and hooked on small central mound ( Fig. 77 View FIGURES 75–78 ). Raphe with small thickened ridges mid-way across valve. Distal raphe ends form small triangular lacinia extending to base of mantle ( Fig. 78 View FIGURES 75–78 ). Axial area straight to linear-elliptic with no surface depressions ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 75–78 ). One longitudinal canal along each margin, extending to base of terminal raphe fissure ( Fig. 78 View FIGURES 75–78 ). Longitudinal canal with two external pores, one on valve face, one on mantle ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 75–78 ). Areolae round to elliptical, no cribra occlusions evident. Internal view, helictoglossae at raphe ends not, deflected up, not recurved ( Figs 79, 81, 82 View FIGURES 79–82 ). Terminal apex without prominent pseudosepta ( Fig. 82 View FIGURES 79–82 ). Central helictoglossae separate, in linear alignment ( Fig. 81 View FIGURES 79–82 ). Central area broad with recessed coverings between virgae. Areolae chambered ( Fig. 80 View FIGURES 79–82 ). Areolae openings round to linear-elliptic, covered by hymenae ( Fig. 80 View FIGURES 79–82 , arrow). Renilimbia scattered, primarily around longitudinal canals and axial area ( Figs 81, 82 View FIGURES 79–82 ). Longitudinal canal with single row of elliptical areolae covered with hymenae.
Type:— CANADA. British Columbia: Vancouver, VanDusen Botanical Garden, J. Holmes, December 28, 2016. Small stream at the end of Livingstone Lake (pond) (holotype: CANA! 126257-1, fig. 71 holotype specimen circled on slide.). Isotype ANSP GC65329 (circled specimen on slide). Genbank # See table 2.
Etymology:—The specific epithet ( lavoieanum ) is presented in honour of Dr. I. Lavoie for her exceptional work on ecosystem modelling, diatom ecology, toxicology and teratology.
Registration: http//phycobank.org/102032
Observations:—The linear to linear-elliptic valve form with capitate apices is represented in a number of Neidium species. At present plastid rbc L DNA sequence, size (59–70 μm long), one prominent longitudinal canal, and formation of the proximal helictoglossae identifies this taxon. Neidium lavoieanum can be compared with N. longiceps (W.Greg. 1856: 8) R. Ross (1947: 210) from North America ( Lefebvre et al. 2017), but separated by larger size ( N. longiceps 28–47 μm long, 8–12 μm wide), and lower stria count ( N. longiceps 30–36 in 10 μm), and a distinct difference in the rbc L gene. All other morphological features are similar between the two taxa. Another similar taxon is N. angustatum Liu et al. (2017: 11) , but N. angustatum is narrower (10–11 μm), with a higher stria count (25–27 in 10 μm), different striae orientation and the apices are more rostrate than capitate. No DNA metrics are available for comparison.
Genetic Analysis
The maximum-likelihood (ML) analyses of rbc L sequence data present a broad taxonomic tree across the genus Neidium ( Fig. 83 View FIGURES 83 , Supplement B). Interestingly, the rbc L genetic divergence among the Neidium taxa examined was relatively low (<1%), however the genetically identified clades separate well with morphology, indicating that rbc L is conserved among taxa of this genus. The new species described here were between 0.4 to 0.96% different from their nearest neighbour. For example, Neidium collare (n=1) was 0.96% (6 bp different over 625 bp) different from N. bisulcatum (Lagerst. 1873: 31) Cleve (1894: 68) . Neidium lavoieanum was separated from N. cf. productum (W.Sm. 1853: 51) Cleve (1894: 69) (Czarnecki culture, UTEX collection) with the smallest difference, 0.40% (3 bp over 751 bp). Neidium iridis was also present in the creek sample (Lake Victoria, VanDusen Botanical Garden) and was 0.67% different (5 bp over 750 bp) from N. lavoieanum . These differences are in line with established Neidium species, for example N. fossum and N. longiceps are 0.51% different (6 bp over 1168 bp). In the ML analysis, the genus Neidium was monophyletic relative to the outgroup taxa included ( Neidiomorpha , Luticola and Scoliopleura ) and had medium bootstrap support (84%, Fig. 83 View FIGURES 83 ). Neidiomorpha binodis and N. binodeformis were associated with Luticola ventricosa and sister to S coliopleura peisonis . Within the genus Neidium , N. hitchcockii was sister to the other species included in this study. A clade including N. fossum Lefebvre & P.B.Hamil. (2015, 214), N. longiceps , N. sacoense Reimer (1959: 29) ( Patrick & Reimer 1966: 402, pl 37: 3), and N. promontorium Lefebvre & P.B.Hamil. (2017: 696, 697) had high support (98%), while many of the other relationships between species were poorly supported in this analysis ( Fig. 83 View FIGURES 83 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.