Camponotus coloratus Forel 1904
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.179222 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6247347 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C2878B-FFF6-FFF2-F3D4-D3DC3774F813 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Camponotus coloratus Forel 1904 |
status |
|
Camponotus coloratus Forel 1904 a. NEW STATUS.
Camponotus melanoticus View in CoL v. colorata Forel 1904a: 49 . [holotype w examined, MHNG; Ciénaga, Columbia]. Camponotus (Myrmoturba) melanoticus View in CoL var. colorata Forel. Bruch 1914: 229 . Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex) substitutus View in CoL var. colorata Forel. Emery 1925: 83 . Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex) substitutus View in CoL var. coloratus Forel. Kempf 1972: 72 .
Camponotus coloratus cannot be considered conspecific with C. substitutus . Both ants are locally sympatric in the Paraguayan chaco without signs of hybridization. These species share a similar striking bicoloration (see discussion under C. substitutus ), but workers of C. coloratus , in addition to being on average larger than workers of C. substitutus , have disproportionately longer legs, a more opaque microsculpture, and considerably reduced pilosity with the sides of the head of the major bearing fewer than 5 standing setae. Paraguayan material is lighter in color and with a broader head in the major caste than Forel’s type from Colombia, but given the allopatric nature of the variation I see no reason to divide C. coloratus further.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Camponotus coloratus Forel 1904
Wild, Alexander L. 2007 |
var. coloratus
Forel. Kempf 1972: 72 |
var. colorata
Forel. Emery 1925: 83 |
var. colorata
Forel. Bruch 1914: 229 |
v. colorata
Forel 1904: 49 |