Sphex stadelmanni stadelmanni Kohl, 1895
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.796.1665 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:76C5C9C4-C6C1-4EDC-8FF8-9828A6EF2040 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6535890 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C20928-FFE5-FFD4-423C-17FA3F0809F0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Sphex stadelmanni stadelmanni Kohl, 1895 |
status |
|
Sphex stadelmanni stadelmanni Kohl, 1895
Figs 16 View Figs 13–18 , 21–22 View Figs 19–24. 19–20 , 95, 99 View Figure 93–99. 93, 96 (yellow)
Sphex stadelmanni Kohl, 1895: 67 Chlorion stadelmanni var. integrum Arnold, 1928: 372 View in CoL , ♀, ♂ (syntypes: South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal, Scottburgh; Zimbabwe, Manicaland, Chirinda Forest; Mozambique, “Rikatla”, R. Stevenson leg.; SAM, TMP, not examined). Syn. nov.
Differential diagnosis
Within their species group, members of this species ( Fig. 95 View Figure 93–99. 93, 96 ) closely resemble those of S. abyssinicus and S. schoutedeni malawicus subsp. nov., as all three are black with primarily dark vestiture. The males of S. stadelmanni s. lat. are most easily distinguishable through the structure of their genitalia. The penis valvae are fused and curved towards the dorsal side, where they form a chalice-like configuration with a slightly widened margin ( Figs 21–22 View Figs 19–24. 19–20 ). The valvicipites are curved posteroventrally. In S. schoutedeni and its subspecies S. s. malawicus subsp. nov., the penis valvae lack a widened margin, and the valvicipites do not curve back toward the ventral side, but continue in dorsal direction ( Figs 23–24 View Figs 19–24. 19–20 ). In S. abyssinicus , the fused part of the valvae is dorsoventrally enlarged ( Fig. 26 View Figs 25–32. 25–26 ) and sternum VIII is conspicuously rectangular ( Fig. 25 View Figs 25–32. 25–26 ).
Males of S. abbotti abbotti ( Fig. 88 View Figs 85–92. 85–86 ) and S. bohemanni ( Fig. 90 View Figs 85–92. 85–86 ) are also similar, but can be identified via their incised sternum VII ( Figs 19–20 View Figs 19–24. 19–20 ). Those of the subspecies S. stadelmanni rufus subsp. nov. ( Fig. 97 View Figure 93–99. 93, 96 ) are characterized by having the central and lower part of the clypeus, as well as trochanter, femur and tibia, ferruginous instead of black.
Females of S. stadelmanni stadelmanni are very difficult to distinguish from those of S. abbotti abbotti , as both share uniformly black appressed clypeal and paraocular setae without a differently-colored luster ( Figs 15–16 View Figs 13–18 ). However, the ferruginous color of the mandibles is more extensive and also present on the free clypeal margin in S. stadelmanni stadelmanni . In contrast, S. abbotti abbotti has the clypeal margin and most of the mandibular base black. In some of the other females of the bohemanni group, the appressed setae on the paraocular area and clypeus are also black, but show a luster of a different color when viewed from certain angles ( Figs 14, 17–18 View Figs 13–18 ).
Material examined
Holotype
MOZAMBIQUE – Maputo Province • ♂; Delagoa Bay [now Maputo Bay] ; [25°59ʹ S, 32°42ʹ E]; ZMB. GoogleMaps
Other material
ESWATINI – Manzini Region • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Middleveld, Malkerns Research Station ; [26°31ʹ41.7ʺ S, 31°11ʹ55.5ʺ E]; 16 Mar. 1979; G.G.M. Schulten leg.; RMNH GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding but 19 Apr. 1979; RMNH GoogleMaps .
MOZAMBIQUE – Maputo City • 1 ♀; Maputo, Universidade ; [25°58ʹ S, 32°35ʹ E]; 7 Feb. 1976; H.R. Feijen leg.; RMNH GoogleMaps . – Maputo Province • 3 ♂♂; same collection data as for holotype; ZMB GoogleMaps • 3 ♂♂; same locality as for holotype; R. Monteiro leg.; ZMB GoogleMaps .
SOUTH AFRICA – Gauteng • 1 ♀; Johannesburg, Bloksberg ; [26°12ʹ16ʺ S, 28°02ʹ44ʺ E]; 1907; C.H. Pead leg.; BMNH GoogleMaps • 2 ♀; Pretoria ; [25°43ʹ32ʺ S, 28°14ʹ38ʺ E]; W.L. Distant leg.; BMNH GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; 1 Jan. 1924; W. Lingnau leg.; DEI GoogleMaps . – KwaZulu-Natal • 1 ♂; 20 km S of Manguzi; [27°10ʹ45ʺ S, 32°42ʹ46ʺ E]; 3 Dec. 2002; Ma. Halada leg.; OÖLM GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Durban ; [29°53ʹ S, 31°03ʹ E]; 1902; F. Muir leg.; BMNH GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; W.L. Distant leg.; BMNH GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Durban, Blue Lagoon ; [29°48ʹ34.1ʺ S, 31°01ʹ59.4ʺ E]; 11 Mar. 1963; H.N. Empey leg.; RMNH GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Elephant Game Park, Tembe ; 27°03ʹ S, 32°24ʹ E; 23 Feb. 1997; F. Koch leg.; ZMB GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding but 19 Nov. 1999; ZMB GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Ithala Game Res. ; 27°30ʹ S, 31°20ʹ E; 28–30 Jan. 1995; F. Koch leg.; ZMB GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Ithala Game Res., Savannah ; 27°30ʹ S, 31°20ʹ E; 4–10 Apr. 2001; F. Koch leg.; ZMB GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Ithala Game Reserve, Louwsburg ; [27°32ʹ48.14ʺ S, 31°18ʹ48.71ʺ E]; 10–23 Dec. 1993; F. Koch leg.; THD-008-ZMB ; GenBank LWR gene: MW582288 View Materials ; ZMB GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; ZMB GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Kosi Bay Nature Reserve ; 26°58ʹ S, 32°50ʹ E; 19 Apr. 1999; F. Koch leg.; THD-009-ZMB ; GenBank CO1 gene: MW538556 View Materials ; ZMB GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Malvern ; [29°53ʹ06ʺ S, 30°55ʹ30ʺ E]; 1904; J.P. Cregoe leg.; BMNH GoogleMaps • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Mbazwana ; [27°30ʹ S, 32°34ʹ44.4ʺ E]; 6 Dec. 2002; Ma. Halada leg.; OÖLM GoogleMaps • 2 ♂♂; Pinetown ; [29°49ʹ S, 30°51ʹ E]; 21 Mar. 1910; G.F. Leigh leg.; TMP GoogleMaps • 2 ♂♂; Salt Rock Beach ; [29°30ʹ10.98ʺ S, 31°14ʹ19.98ʺ E]; 8 Apr. 1958; CAS GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Scottburgh ; [30°17ʹ S, 30°45ʹ E]; 15 Mar. 1963; H.N. Empey leg.; RMNH GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; 14 Mar. 1926; R.H.R. Stevenson leg.; BMNH GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Shongweni Dam ; [29°51ʹ15ʺ S, 30°42ʹ50ʺ E]; 15 Jan. 1976; F.J. Herbst leg.; AMG GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; 25 Feb. 1971; F.L. Farquharson leg.; AMG GoogleMaps • 2 ♀♀; Umtentweni ; 30°43ʹ S, 30°28ʹ E; 20 Apr. 1973; H.N. Empey leg.; AMG GoogleMaps . – Limpopo • 1 ♀; 16 km E of Louis Trichardt; [23°03ʹ59.6ʺ S, 30°03ʹ19.4ʺ E]; 8 Dec. 1974; J.G. and B.L. Rozen leg.; AMNH GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Lekgalameetse Nature Reserve ; 24°12ʹ S, 30°20ʹ E; 25–31 Mar. 2001; F. Koch leg.; ZMB GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; ZMB GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding but 26 Mar.– 1 Apr. 2001; ZMB GoogleMaps • 13 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding but 30 Oct.–3 Nov 2010; ZMB GoogleMaps . – Mpumalanga • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; 20 km NW of Nelspruit [now Mbombela]; [25°20ʹ09ʺ S, 30°49ʹ35.5ʺ E]; 26 Nov. 2003; J. Halada leg.; OÖLM GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Blyderevierspoort National Park ; 24°39ʹ S, 30°50ʹ E; 13 Dec. 1995; F. Koch leg.; ZMB GoogleMaps • 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding but 10 Nov. 1999; ZMB GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding but 13 Nov. 1999; ZMB GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding but 1–3 Apr. 2001; ZMB GoogleMaps .
ZAMBIA – Northern Province • 1 ♀; “L. Chambezi V. ; Kasama distr. ”; alt. 3900 ft; 4–6 May 1908; S.A. Neave leg.; OUMNH .
ZIMBABWE – Manicaland • 1 ♀; Chirinda Forest ; [20°24ʹ36ʺ S, 32°40ʹ08ʺ E]; Nov. 1930; BMNH GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding but Dec. 1935; BMNH GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; [20°24ʹ37ʺ S, 32°41ʹ57ʺ E]; 20 Oct. 1949; USNM GoogleMaps .
Description
Female
SIZE. 25.5–28.2 mm.
COLOR. Black except for basal half of mandible, free clypeal margin and occasionally femora, which are dark ferruginous. Wings uniformly fuscous, with cyan-purple iridescence.
VESTITURE.Appressed and erect setae on clypeus, paraocular area, collar, scutum and propodeal enclosure black. Erect propodeal setae oriented posteriorly. Lower center of clypeus glabrous. Scutellum densely and coarsely pubescent.
STRUCTURE. Free clypeal margin medially with two broad, indistinct processes, stepped above. Clypeus with indentation in lower center, longitudinal carina in upper center barely noticeable. Scutellum convex. Metanotum not raised, not notably bituberculate. 2 nd recurrent vein joins markedly proximal from interstitium between submarginal cells II and III. Propodeal enclosure without any notable ridges. Foretarsomere I 2.4–2.6 × length of antepenultimate spine. Petiole length 1.3–1.7× its medial width.
Male
SIZE. 22.9–27.0 mm.
COLOR. Black except for basal half of mandible, which is ferruginous. Wings slightly fuscous, with cyan-purple iridescence.
VESTITURE. Appressed setae on clypeus and paraocular area brassy, on collar, scutum and propodeal enclosure black. Erect setae on clypeus, paraocular area, collar, scutum and propodeal enclosure black, on posterior margin of propodeum brassy in some specimens. Erect propodeal setae oriented posteriorly.
Free clypeal margin glabrous. Scutellum densely and coarsely pubescent. Metasomal sterna II–VII with increasingly dense fringes of black setae.
STRUCTURE. Free clypeal margin simple. Scutellum convex. Metanotum not raised, not bituberculate. 2 nd recurrent vein joins markedly proximal from interstitium between submarginal cells II and III. Propodeal enclosure without any notable ridges. Posterior margin of metasomal tergum VII convex. Posterior margin of metasomal sternum VII simple, of metasomal sternum VIII semicircular. Fused penis valvae laterally widened, without notch, valviceps oriented posterodorsally. Petiole length 1.6–2.2× its medial width. Flagellomeres IV–VI with broad placoids covering their entire length.
Variation
Unknown.
Distribution
Southeastern Africa.
Remarks
Of Sphex stadelmanni stadelmanni , only the holotype is known. It differs from members of the subspecies S. s. integer ( Arnold, 1928), which was described about 30 years later, in a single character: S. s. stadelmanni possesses a very notable broad incision on the posterior margin of tergum VII, while S. s. integer has tergum VII entire. We have studied several other males from the same locality as the type, presumably collected in a similar time period, but all of them, as well as every other specimen we examined that belonged to S. stadelmanni s. lat. were either S. s. integer or S. s. rufus subsp. nov. The morphological disparity in the holotype of S. stadelmanni stadelmanni might have been the result of malformation during ontogeny. This hypothesis is corroborated by the fact that all of the other terga of the specimen appear to be deformed in a similar way, albeit asymmetrically and only on the right side. It seems as though in this case, the emarginations are placed more centrally on a tergum the further posterior it is, so the symmetrical incision on the final tergum could fit with this theory. We propose that S. s. integer becomes a synonym of S. s. stadelmanni , as the holotype of S. s. stadelmanni is presumably merely an aberration of the same species, though the name has priority. Perhaps future DNA analyses will reveal more information, but with the methods used in this project we cannot hope to generate meaningful data from this over 120-year-old specimen.
ZMB |
Germany, Berlin, Museum fuer Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universitaet |
BMNH |
United Kingdom, London, The Natural History Museum [formerly British Museum (Natural History)] |
DEI |
Germany, Muencheberg, Deutsches Entomologisches Institut im ZALF |
TMP |
Taiwan [Republic of China], Taipei, Taiwan Provincial Museum |
CAS |
USA, California, San Francisco, California Academy of Sciences |
AMG |
South Africa, Cape Province, Grahamstown, Albany Museum |
AMNH |
USA, New York, New York, American Museum of Natural History |
OUMNH |
United Kingdom, Oxford, University Museum of Natural History |
USNM |
USA, Washington D.C., National Museum of Natural History, [formerly, United States National Museum] |
ZMB |
Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (Zoological Collections) |
RMNH |
National Museum of Natural History, Naturalis |
DEI |
Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut |
TMP |
Transvaal Museum |
CAS |
California Academy of Sciences |
AMG |
Albany Museum |
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Sphex stadelmanni stadelmanni Kohl, 1895
Dörfel, Thorleif H. & Ohl, Michael 2022 |
Sphex stadelmanni
Arnold G. 1928: 372 |
Kohl F. F. 1895: 67 |