Anaphalis bournei Fyson, 1914
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/adansonia2021v43a17 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5573093 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C09B77-FFCC-347F-FE8A-2C86FBB0FD45 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Anaphalis bournei Fyson |
status |
|
Anaphalis bournei Fyson View in CoL
Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 1914: 209 ( Fyson 1914) ( Fig. 1B View FIG ).
TYPE CITATION. — “South India, Pulney Hills, dry and rocky places, Bourne 2696, Fyson. Nilgiri Hills, Kotagiri, Wight K.D. 1630, Courtallam, Wight. Annamally Hills, Wight K.D. 1630.”
LECTOTYPE (HERE DESIGNATED). — India. Tamil Nadu, Dindigul District, Pulneys , Kodaikanal waterfall, 09.VI.1898, L. Bourne 2696 (lecto-, K [ K000899046 image]! ; isolecto-, K [ K000899045 , digital image]!).
RESIDUAL SYNTYPE. — India. Tamil Nadu, Courtallam , s.d., Wight K.D. 1630 (syn-, MH [ MH00002273 ]!).
DISTRIBUTION. — India (Kerala and Tamil Nadu), endemic.
REMARKS
In the protologue of Anaphalis bournei , Fyson (1914: 209) cited three specimens namely, “ Bourne 2696, Fyson. Nilgiri Hills, Kotagiri, Wight, K.D. 1630, Courtallam, Wight. Anamally Hills, Wight, K.D. 1630 ”. We have traced three herbarium sheets in two herbaria, two at K (K000899045, K000899046) and one at MH (MH00002273). Among these, the specimen K000899046 is designated here as the lectotype of the name A. bournei , as the characters of the flowering twig matches well with the protologue.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |