Metapone titan, Taylor, Robert W. & Alpert, Gary D., 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4105.6.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DCB6A5BB-46C9-4D05-8B4A-C6E4CBABB6F |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C087E7-456F-FFA3-FF3C-FCE6FA014EA7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Metapone titan |
status |
|
Key to the Micronesian, Melanesian and Pacific species of Metapone View in CoL
1. Subpetiolar extension a narrow, hook-like process, its base occupying less-than one-quarter of the subpetiolar edge in lateral view............................................................................................... 2
Subpetiolar extension an expansive triangular or rounded/subrectangular process, its base occupying at least half the subpetiolar edge in lateral view................................................................................. 3
2(1) The largest known Metapone View in CoL species (gyne HW 2.3–2.5 mm, TL ca. 14–16 mm). Clypeal rostrum relatively very large and broad, projecting ca 0.68x its apical width beyond the lateral sections of the clypeus in frontal view ( Papua New Guinea: New Ireland, gyne only, Figs 111–115 View FIGURES 111 – 115 )............................................................... M. titan sp.n.
Smaller species (known HW 1.28mm, TL ca 7.5 mm). Clypeal rostrum smaller, projecting ca 0.44x its apical width beyond the lateral sections of the clypeus in frontal view. (mainland Papua New Guinea, worker only, Figs 101–105 View FIGURES 101 – 105 ).. M. philwardi sp.n.
3(1) Clypeus apically rostrate, with a strong proboscis-like median extension projecting well beyond its lateral sections........ 4
Clypeus projecting but barely rostrate, median apical section only slightly advanced beyond lateral sections, anterior border with an apical median, tab-like projection, a little narrower than the body of the sclerite, to which it is stepped on either side...................................................................................................... 6
4(3) Smaller species (HW 0.87mm). ( Solomon Islands: San Cristobal, gyne only, Figs 106–110 View FIGURES 106 – 110 )............. M. salomonis sp.n
. Generally larger species HW 0.85–1.22mm ( Micronesia, New Guinea, New Britain)................................ 5
5(4) (In gynes & workers) Frons, cheeks, clypeus, promesonotal dorsum and sides of pronotum and petiole distinctly and regularly longitudinally or diagonally finely striate ( Figs 71 View FIGURES 71 – 75 –80). Clypeal projection relatively a little shorter and narrower than in the alternative ( Figs 71, 73 View FIGURES 71 – 75 , 76, 78). Petiolar node relatively short and narrow ( Figs 72, 74, 75 View FIGURES 71 – 75 , 77, 79, 80). Apex of subpetiolar extension inclined posteriorly, broadly rounded ( Figs 72, 75 View FIGURES 71 – 75 , 77, 80) ( Micronesia, mainland New Guinea, New Britain, gyne and worker)...................................................................... M. krombeini M.R. Smith View in CoL
(In gynes & workers) Striae in relevant areas less-strongly developed and less-regular; partly effaced, especially on frons and cheeks ( Figs 81 View FIGURES 81 – 85 –90). Clypeal proboscis relatively short and broad ( Figs 81, 83 View FIGURES 81 – 85 , 86, 88). Petiole relatively short in lateral and dorsal view ( Figs 82, 84, 85 View FIGURES 81 – 85 , 87,89). Subpetiolar extension similar to alternative, but with its apex acutely pointed ( Figs 82, 85 View FIGURES 81 – 85 , 87, 90) (mainland New Guinea, gyne and worker)............................................ M. truki M.R. Smith View in CoL
6(3) Larger species (HW 1.48 mm, TL ca 8.8mm (N=1). Subpetiolar extension subrectangular, ca twice as long as deep, the outer corners minutely rounded (New Guinea, Gyne only, Figs 91–95 View FIGURES 91 – 95 )................................. M. enigmatical sp.n.
Smaller species (HW 1.02–1.09mm, TL ca 7.1–7.4mm). Subpetiolar extension an approximately equilateral triangle, inclined posteriorly ( Fiji: Viti Levu, gyne only, Figs 96–100 View FIGURES 96 – 100 ).............................................. M. manni sp.n.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |