Cophixalus ateles (Boulenger, 1898)

Kraus, Fred, 2012, Papuan frogs of the genus Cophixalus (Anura: Microhylidae): new synonyms, new species, and a dichotomous key, Zootaxa 3559, pp. 1-36 : 5

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.282919

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6180268

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C087AC-FF86-FF9F-AB84-FEB9FD88CCA4

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Cophixalus ateles (Boulenger, 1898)
status

 

Cophixalus ateles (Boulenger, 1898) View in CoL

Sphenophryne ateles Boulenger, 1898: 708 View in CoL . Oreophryne ateles van Kampen, 1923: 115. Cophixalus ateles Parker, 1934: 172 View in CoL .

Cophixalus sisyphus Kraus and Allison, 2006: 214 View in CoL .

Because the original description of C. ateles View in CoL is rather sparse on comparative details, the recent detailed description of C. sisyphus ( Kraus and Allison, 2006) View in CoL will serve that purpose well. Hence, there is no need to provide a redescription here.

Cophixalus ateles View in CoL is known with certainty only from the region of the type locality and from the western slopes of Mt. Obree approximately 50 km to the east of that ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Several close relatives of C. ateles View in CoL occur throughout the southeastern region of New Guinea and offshore islands (see below), but the exact distributions of these species are not yet well known. It is clear, however, that C. ateles View in CoL is syntopic with at least one of these ( C. variabilis View in CoL ) in the Moroka region (both having been taken at 2.2 km S and 3.1 km W of Wori Wori Bluff, 9.39575˚S, 147.5699˚E, Central Province). Based on the type series of C. sisyphus View in CoL , C. ateles View in CoL is known to range in elevation from 600–1870 m asl.

It should be mentioned that, despite the shared feature of the first finger being reduced in size and lacking a circum-marginal groove, C. ateles View in CoL is not particularly closely related to C. shellyi View in CoL , as implied in earlier literature. That implication derived from the early state of study of Papuan Cophixalus View in CoL , when only two species with reduced first fingers were known ( Zweifel, 1956a, b; Tyler, 1963a, b). But several more species with that attribute have subsequently been described, and C. ateles View in CoL and C. shellyi View in CoL now appear to belong to separate species groups—whether monophyletic or paraphyletic—that have independently simplified the first finger—the two look nothing alike in habitus, color pattern, or other morphological details, yet each is closely similar to more recently described species. Based on overall appearance, call similarities, and similar lifestyles, C. ateles View in CoL is clearly closely related to C. timidus View in CoL and C. variabilis View in CoL (both of which have welldeveloped first fingers with terminal grooves), which is why they were described as sibling species. And the more recently described C. linnaeus Kraus and Allison, 2009 View in CoL and C. phaeobalius Kraus and Allison, 2009 View in CoL (which have well-developed first fingers with terminal grooves) as well as C. tomaiodactylus Kraus and Allison, 2009 View in CoL (which has the reduced first finger lacking a terminal groove) probably belong to this species group too. All these species lack a black face mask; all are variegated in color pattern with brown, gray, and/ or black; all are scansorial; and all are known only from the Papuan Peninsula of New Guinea. In contrast, relatives of C. shellyi View in CoL (including C. bewaniensis Kraus and Allison, 2000 View in CoL , C. iovaorum Kraus and Allison, 2009 View in CoL , C. pipilans Zweifel, 1980 View in CoL , and C. desticans Kraus and Allison, 2009 View in CoL ) share the feature of a black face mask; all except C. desticans View in CoL also share a smooth dorsum (although C. desticans View in CoL has narrow dermal ridges dorsally, these are small and difficult to see, and the species does not have the tuberculate appearance of members of the C. ateles View in CoL group). Collectively, these species inhabit a broader portion of New Guinea, being found in the Papuan Peninsula as well as the Central Highlands, Huon Peninsula, and North Coast Ranges. Additional species ( C. humicola Günther, 2006 View in CoL , C. kethuk Kraus and Allison, 2009 View in CoL , C. sphagnicola Zweifel and Allison, 1982 View in CoL , and C. tridactylus Günther, 2006 View in CoL ) also have reduced first fingers, but it remains uncertain whether they are closely related to either of the above two groups. Judging from very different body morphology, at least C. kethuk View in CoL and C. sphagnicola View in CoL likely represent additional independent acquisitions of this feature. The first appears closely related to C. tagulensis Zweifel, 1963 View in CoL , based on overall phenotypic similarity and the synapomorphic presence of toe webbing, and C. tagulensis View in CoL has a normal-sized first finger, suggesting that C. kethuk View in CoL has again independently acquired the reduced character state of that structure. And the habitus and morphology of C. sphagnicola View in CoL are unlike all the other Cophixalus View in CoL having reduced first fingers, suggesting that it too may represent an independent lineage not closely related to the others. Given the small size of all these species, it may be that reduced first-finger size is a frequent morphological corollary of size miniaturization, the latter perhaps acquired (at least in several species) in response to a lifestyle devoted to inhabiting leaf litter, as seen in other miniaturized frogs ( Lehr and Coloma, 2008; Lehr and Catenazzi, 2009; Kraus, 2010, 2011).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Amphibia

Order

Anura

Family

Microhylidae

Genus

Cophixalus

Loc

Cophixalus ateles (Boulenger, 1898)

Kraus, Fred 2012
2012
Loc

Cophixalus sisyphus

Kraus 2006: 214
2006
Loc

Sphenophryne ateles

Parker 1934: 172
Kampen 1923: 115
1923
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF