Tapinauchenius rasti Hüsser, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5101.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0FD7126B-77A7-4B99-A0E7-04298368C3C4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6316501 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BF87CE-A303-FFDC-FF5E-F9FAFE30FA25 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tapinauchenius rasti Hüsser, 2018 |
status |
|
Tapinauchenius rasti Hüsser, 2018 View in CoL
( Figs 19 View FIGURE 19 , 21–22 View FIGURES 21–23. 21 , 111–118 View FIGURES 111–118 , 120–121 View FIGURES 119–121. 119 )
Tapinauchenius rasti Hüsser, 2018: 81 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , figs 10A–B, 11A–C, 12A–C.
Diagnosis. Females of Tapinauchenius rasti resemble those of T. plumipes , T. cupreus , T. latipes and T. polybotes in having spermathecae with a constriction near the tip, forming a small and strongly sclerotized lobe ( Fig. 118 View FIGURES 111–118 ). They differ from those of T. plumipes by the tibiae III tip lacking an apical-ventral row of spiniform setae; and legs, carapace and chelicerae lacking a violet sheen. They differ from females of T. latipes by the longer spermathecae; from T. cupreus by the non-oval spermathecae shape, and from T. polybotes by the geographic distribution on Union Island, in the Caribbean ( Figs 21–22 View FIGURES 21–23. 21 ). Males of T. rasti resemble those of T. polybotes by the short embolus less than 2.7 times subtegulum length ( Fig. 111 View FIGURES 111–118 ). They differ from T. polybotes by the embolus tip lacking a sinuous curvature in dorsal view ( Fig. 114 View FIGURES 111–118 ).
Type material. Holotype male and paratype female from Union Island , St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Lesser Antilles, Burgess leg., B. Rast ded., 2013, deposited at SMF, not examined.
Other material examined. SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES: Union Island [12°35’53”N, 61°26’15”W], near Monte Tabor, 3 males, R. Powell col. GoogleMaps from silken retreat in tree cavities, 16 June 2010 ( MZUSP 76533 View Materials ); 1 female, same data and collector ( MNRJ 7702 View Materials ); Mustique island [12°52’N, 61°11’W] near Barbados, 1 male, BZ Raphael DVM col., 1991, identified as T. plumipes (AMNH-Tap-1.) GoogleMaps
Redescription. Male (MZUSP 76533). Total length, not including chelicerae or spinnerets 29.62. Carapace 13.09 long, 11.97 wide, 2.88 high. Chelicera: 6.39 long. Legs (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus, total): I: 12.47, 7.11, 11.05, 10.52, 5.02, 46.17; II: 11.10, 6.49, 9.72, 10.03, 4.56, 41.90; III: 9.66, 5.38, 10.72, 9.37, 4.80, 39.93; IV: 11.58, 5.65, 10.89, 12.10, 4.77, 44.99; Palp: 7.93, 4.33, 6.85, -, 2.58, 21.69. Midwidths: femora I–IV= 2.74, 2.55, 2.71, 2.64, palp= 1.94; patellae I–IV= 2.59, 2.45, 2.50, 2.46, palp= 2.03; tibiae I–IV= 2.17, 1.93, 1.98, 1.97, palp= 2.00; metatarsi I–IV= 1.31, 1.22, 1.15, 1.20; tarsi I–IV= 1.16, 1.23, 1.33, 1.30, palp= 1.97. Abdomen: 16.53 long, 9.98 wide. Spinnerets: PMS, 1.97 long, 0.61 wide, 0.79 apart; PLS, 3.01 basal, 2.11 middle, 3.16 distal; midwidths 1.16, 0.84, 0.57, respectively. Carapace: 1.09 times longer than wide; cephalic region slightly raised, thoracic striae conspicuous. Fovea: deep, straight, 1.20 wide. Eyes: eye tubercle 0.49 high, 1.69 long, 2.85 wide. Clypeus: absent. Anterior eye row straight, posterior recurved. Eye size and interdistances: AME 0.67, ALE 0.65, PME 0.42, PLE 0.52, AME–AME 0.36, AME–ALE 0.22, AME–PME 0.26, ALE–ALE 2.04, ALE–PME 0.35, PME–PME 1.54, PME–PLE 0.13, PLE–PLE 2.17, ALE–PLE 0.27. Maxilla: length to width 1.73. Cuspules: ca. 179 spread over ventral inner heel. Labium: 2.08 long, 2.40 wide, with ca. 157 cuspules spaced by one diameter from each other on anterior third. Chelicera: basal segment with 9 teeth in row. Sternum: 6.37 long, 5.12 wide.
Legs: Formula: I = IV II III. Length leg IV to leg I: 0.97. Scopula: Tarsi I–IV fully scopulate; IV with few sparse setae. Metatarsi I–II fully scopulate; III 2/3 distal; IV 1/2 distal. IV divided by rows of setae. Spination: Palps and legs (ventral apical: tibia/metatarsi): Palp 0; I: 1 behind retrolateral process of tibial apophysis; II: 2/0; III 1/0; IV 0/0. Tibial apophysis ( Figs 115–117 View FIGURES 111–118 ): two processes, retrolateral longer than prolateral, one spine at side of prolateral process, one on apical part of retrolateral process. Conspicuous triangular protuberance behind retrolateral process. Metatarsus I folds on retrolateral side of tibial apophysis.
Palp ( Figs 111–114 View FIGURES 111–118 ): tegulum length 1.28, width 1.40, embolus proximal width 0.62, length 3.08. Embolus proximal portion roughly straight. Embolus length to tegulum length: 2.40, thick proximal embolus and straight tip. Embolus distal portion narrows abruptly ending in a curved tip.
Color pattern (preserved in alcohol): Carapace, legs, palpal femora, and tibiae brown-reddish; abdomen light brown.
Redescription. Female (MNRJ 7702). Total length, not including chelicerae or spinnerets 39.32. Carapace 18.3 long, 16.13 wide, 5.08 high. Chelicera: 10.32 long. Legs (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus, total): I: 14.29, 9.25, 11.01, 10.66, 5.20, 50.41; II: 12.78, 8.42, 10.16, 10.20, 4.49, 46.05; III: 11.16, 7.00, 8.64, 9.76, 4.68, 41.24; IV: 13.56, 7.66, 11.50, 12.53, 4.65, 49.9; Palp: 10.08, 5.94, 6.79, -, 6.75, 29.56. Midwidths: femora I–IV= 3.44, 3.55, 3.6, 3.59, palp= 2.91; patellae I–IV= 3.94, 3.72, 3.43, 3.46, palp=3.18; tibiae I–IV= 3.13, 2.80, 2.84, 2.98, palp= 2.70; metatarsi I–IV= 2.46, 2.12, 1.80, 1.77; tarsi I–IV= 2.36, 2.21, 2.29, 2.07, palp= 2.46. Abdomen: 21.02 long, 12.55 wide. Spinnerets: PMS, 2.29 long, 1.01 wide, 0.45 apart; PLS, 3.38 basal, 2.66 middle, 3.80 distal; midwidths 1.64, 1.33, 1.16, respectively. Carapace: 1.13 times longer than wide; cephalic region slightly raised, thoracic striae conspicuous. Fovea: deep, straight, 2.13 wide. Eyes: eye tubercle 0.34 high, 2.01 long, 3.65 wide. Clypeus: absent. Anterior eye row straight, posterior slightly recurved. Eye size and interdistances: AME 0.74, ALE 0.75, PME 0.38, PLE 0.60, AME–AME 0.52, AME–ALE 0.54, AME–PME 0.40, ALE–ALE 2.69, ALE–PME 0.61, PME–PME 1.99, PME–PLE 0.21, PLE–PLE 3.02, ALE–PLE 0.30. Maxilla: length to width 1.38. Cuspules: ca. 198 spread over ventral inner heel. Labium: 2.56 long, 3.72 wide, with ca. 150 cuspules spaced by one diameter from each other on anterior third. Chelicera: basal segment with 12 teeth in row. Sternum: 9.26 long, 7.40 wide.
Legs: Formula: I = IV II III. Length leg IV to leg I: 0.98. Scopula: Tarsi I–IV fully scopulate; IV with few sparse setae. Metatarsi I–II fully scopulate; III 3/4 distal; IV 1/2 distal. IV divided by rows of setae. Spination: Palps and legs (ventral apical: tibia/metatarsi): Palp 1 prolateral, 1 apical; I: 1/0; II 2/0; III 1/ 0; IV 1/0.
Spermathecae ( Fig. 118 View FIGURES 111–118 ): Two spermathecae completely separated, long and triangular, with an apical wellsclerotized lobe.
Color pattern (preserved in alcohol): Carapace, chelicerae, legs, palps and tibiae brown, covered with light brown setae. Abdomen dark brown. Maxillae, labium, sternum and half part of coxae black.
Distribution. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ( Figs 21–22 View FIGURES 21–23. 21 ).
Remarks. Two ( T. rasti , T. polybotes ) to three ( T. sanctivincenti ) species seem to be endemic to some of the Windward Islands in the Caribbean. A male from Mustique Island we examined resembles those of T. rasti but has shorter embolus with stouter base. That’s the only species in the Archipelago to occur in two islands ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 21–23. 21 ); or, it can be an undescribed species. As we have a single specimen with only this slight morphological difference, it is not possible to answer this question. By the way, the region shows an interesting island endemism and other neighbor islands should be searched for Tapinauchenius specimens. This is of particular interest to those studying evolution in islands and biogeography.
SMF |
Forschungsinstitut und Natur-Museum Senckenberg |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tapinauchenius rasti Hüsser, 2018
Cifuentes, Yeimy & Bertani, Rogerio 2022 |