ARMADILLIDIIDAE Brandt, 1833
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26879/615 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BC87FF-D359-FFD0-2A8B-EC99B2D5FCE9 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
ARMADILLIDIIDAE Brandt, 1833 |
status |
|
Family ARMADILLIDIIDAE Brandt, 1833 View in CoL
Remarks. Apparently, the Hungarian specimen was able to roll up into a ball, thus, it belongs to conglobating isopods. The general habitus of the specimen in question may fit to several oniscidean families, including Armadillidae , Armadillidiidae , or Eubelidae . One of the autapomorphies of the Eubelidae is sulcus arcuatus, a longitudinal grove on the first coxal plate ( Taiti et al., 1991; Schmidt, 2003). The studied specimen does not possess this character, and hence its potential attribution to Eubelidae is disputed. The uropods of armadillidiids differ from the uropods of other conglobating Oniscidea : their exopodite is plate-like, truncate posteriorly. The exopodite fills out the gap between the pleotelson and the pleon-epimera 5, and their truncate apical margin is part of the body outline ( Schmidt, 2003). Unfortunately, the Hungarian specimen does not retain uropods. The pleotelson, however, is partly preserved and its outline is undoubtedly triangular, as it is typical for armadillidiids ( Schmidt, 2003), rather than quadrangular, which is typical for armadiliids ( Schmidt, 2003). As a conclusion, the Hungarian specimen is assigned to the family Armadillidiidae . Up to now, only a handful of veritable occurrences of this family are known from the fossil record ( Table 1).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.