Nothoodes taprobanae ( Andrewes, 1923 ) Guéorguiev & Liang, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4850.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:18AA0411-0E54-4922-84C7-608EAC68D281 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4407696 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BC5E5B-290D-FFF0-FF4B-FAA2EF9CFCA0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nothoodes taprobanae ( Andrewes, 1923 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
23. Nothoodes taprobanae ( Andrewes, 1923) View in CoL , comb. n.
( Figs 32 View FIGURE 32 A–E, Table 5)
Oodes taprobanae Andrewes, 1923: 231 View in CoL (type locality: ‘ Vavuniya’ , Sri Lanka).
References. Oodes taprobanae: Andrewes 1928: 170 View in CoL (distribution in Sri Lanka); Andrewes 1930: 239 (‘ Ceylon: Vavuniya, Anuradhapura.’); Andrewes 1940: 204 (identification key; distribution: ‘Ceylon’); Döbler 1975: 144 (type material deposition); Lorenz 1998: 305; Lorenz 2005: 326.
Oodes (Oodes) taprobanae: Csiki 1931: 1011 View in CoL (‘Ceylon’).
Type material. Oodes taprobanae Andrewes : holotype ♂, ‘Type H.T. [white rounded label with red band, p] // Ceylon 1922.215 [w, h] // Vavuniya ... 04. [w, h] / Oodes taprobanae Andr. Type H.E.Andrewes det. [w, h/p]’ (BMNH); paratype ♀, ‘Anuradhapura Ceylon W. Horn 1899 [w, p] // COTYPUS [r, p] // Oodes taprobanae Andr. Cotype ♀ H.E.Andrewes det. [w, h/p] // DEI Müncheberg Col–07196 [light green, p]’ (SDEI).
Other material examined. None.
TME: 2 specimens. TGE: 1♀ (only spermatheca studied; gonocoxae were not examined since terminal parts of two apical gonocoxites had been destroyed).
Diagnosis. This species is readily differentiated from other congeners by its small size, less than 12 mm, granulation in marginal furrow of elytra discontinuous, and lower EL/PL ( Table 5).
Description (based on female paratype). Habitus. Specimen small for Nothoodes (BL: 10.1 mm, BW: 4.2 mm), with subelongate and moderately convex body ( Fig. 32A View FIGURE 32 ). Ratios and measurements. See Table 5. Color and luster. Dorsal surface black, without iridescence; ventral surface brown, shiny, with iridescence; antennae, palpi, tibiae and tarsi rufopiceous. Punctuation. Dorsal surface without punctuation except posterolateral parts of pronotum, which are with large, relatively shallow punctures extended laterally to posterior half; proepisternum and ventrite 6 at apex with shallow punctures; pro- and metasternum at sides, meso- and metepisternum, and ventrite 1 at base with coarse punctures; ventrites wrinkled at sides. Head. Relatively narrow, half as wide as protonum ( Table 5). Mentum tooth with apex rounded, with paramedial border situated more apically than in other congeners ( Fig. 32B View FIGURE 32 ). Thorax. Pronotum with sides barely rounded toward posterior angles; maximum width close to posterior angles; laterobasal impressions distinct, moderately impressed; base slightly sinuate. Prosternum with shallow median longitudinal sulcus; prosternal process round, with border distinct subapically and very faint at apex ( Fig. 32C View FIGURE 32 ). Metepisternum longer than wide (MA/MM: 0.92), its coadunation with epipleuron short, located anteriorly, less expressed than in N. angustatus ( Fig. 32D View FIGURE 32 ). Elytra. Apical sinuation distinct, but weak. Basal margin distinct, forming a small denticle at shoulder, decreasing medially, reaching level of stria 3. Granulation in marginal furrow discontinuous, interrupted in second fifth of elytron. Parascutellar striola weakly developed, punctiform; striae 1–4 less impressed than other striae. Intervals 1–7 flat to subconvex, interval 8 convex. Male genitalia. Unknown. Female genitalia. Gonocoxite not studied (see remarks above). Bursa copulatrix sub-conical (as in N. angustatus ); spermathecal gland connected at middle of seminal canal ( Fig. 32E View FIGURE 32 ).
Distribution. Oriental region: Sri Lanka.
Bionomics. Nothing is known about the bionomics of this species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Nothoodes taprobanae ( Andrewes, 1923 )
Guéorguiev, Borislav & Liang, Hongbin 2020 |
Oodes taprobanae
Andrewes, H. E. 1923: 231 |