Mecodema genesispotini, Seldon & Buckley, 2019
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4598.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6BA5F086-1014-46B5-B6D5-77FE0CD07AEC |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5678380 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/061226B5-C32F-4872-A503-62C8E934DBB6 |
|
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:061226B5-C32F-4872-A503-62C8E934DBB6 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Mecodema genesispotini |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Mecodema genesispotini View in CoL sp. n.
Figure 28 View FIGURE 28 .
Diagnosis: Distinguished from other North Island Mecodema species by having: 1, a vertexal groove defined by punctures and short rugose wrinkles entire length; 2, pronotum carina smooth with 8–10 setae; 3, pronotum with numerous obsolescent punctures between pronotal foveae; 4, distinctive shape of apical portion of penis lobe ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 PL).
Description: Length 26.6–32 mm, pronotal width 7.3–9.1 mm, elytral width 8.4–10.3 mm. Colour of head and pronotum matte to glossy black, abdomen and elytra matte dark reddish-brown to black; coxae and legs dark reddish-brown.
Head: Very broad and flat. Vertex ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ) with obsolescent wrinkles and sparsely punctured laterally, posterad vertexal groove; vertexal groove shallow, defined by obsolescent punctures laterally, smooth medially; large supraorbital puncture bearing 4–5 setae; 5–6 slightly impressed supraorbital grooves; frons with a large and shallow depression each side of midline, inistinctly grooved antero-laterally; frontoclypeal suture ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ) narrow and well-defined, tentorial pits indistinct; anterior area of clypeus with 3 narrow and well-defined grooves, lateral grooves extended proximate the frontoclypeal suture; 1 setose puncture each side bearing 2 setae, 1 medial puncture within larger depression bearing 2 setae. Labrum lobate, anterior edge outwardly curved and moderately emarginated medially with 2 proximate central setae, 2 setae each side evenly spaced. Mentum lobes rounded ( Fig. 12F View FIGURE 12 ), mentum process short and broad (especially base), moderately angled upward (30°), moderately indentate ( Fig. 12B View FIGURE 12 ); mentum setae variably absent or present. Submentum sclerite constriction broad with 6–8 evenly spaced setae. Stipes with 2 basal setae. Gula pits ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ) small, suture poorly defined, gula flat and smooth. Gena with rugose wrinkles forming an isodiametric pattern across entire area.
Prothorax: Prothoracic carina ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ) broad the entire length, crenulations absent with 8–10 setae each side, carina extended beyond anterior angle; posterior lateral sinuation evidently carinate, parallel or slightly angled outward; pronotum flattened and slightly deflected laterally, overall shape cordate, fine transverse wrinkles across midline and laterally but a gap medially ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 ); midline well-defined, a large anterior medial triangular-shaped impression and posterior medial diamond-shaped impression present; pronotal foveae broad and shallow (may be obsolescent punctures and rugose wrinkles between foveae); anterior edge slightly inwardly curved, posterior edge straight ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 ). Prosternum ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ) flat and smooth; proepisternum without microsculpture (a few obsolescent punctures may be present). Procoxal setae absent; protibia distally expanded and shovel-like ( Fig. 10B View FIGURE 10 ).
Elytra: Broad and moderately deflected; humeral angle evenly convex ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ); basal margin slightly curved and gently sloped to base, interval 1 extended to scutellum; lateral carina narrow entire length, broadened slightly in apical ¼, extended to humeral angle; humerus with 3 long setae proximate within angle, 1 double-spaced posterad ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 ); suture defined, but no more so than striae; striae with small, regularly spaced, asetose punctures slightly increased in size laterally, striae 1–5 entirely with obsolescent asetose punctures, striae 6–8 punctures more visible; intervals 1–4 flat, intervals 5–8 weakly convex, interval 9 moderately convex the entire length; interval microsculpture present as fine lines; 7 th strial setal pattern ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ) with 4 setose punctures in anterior ½, 5 setose punctures in posterior ½, setose punctures large anteriorly, small posteriorly.
Ventral surface: Mesepisternum with several scattered punctures; metepisternum ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ) without microsculpture; setose punctures present on mesocoxae (2) and metacoxae (1). All abdominal ventrites finely lineate; ventrites 3–5 with 1 setose puncture (may have 2 setose punctures on ventrite 3) each side of midline; ventrite 6 setae present: ♂ with 1 seta each side, apical edge bluntly curved, ♀ with 1 seta each side, apical edge bluntly curved; ventrites 2–5 foveate laterally. Anterior metaventrite process ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ) a long triangle with a narrow and well-defined carina the entire length.
Male genitalia: Apical portion of penis lobe asymmetrically hooked and narrow (width) with a very distinct deflection to right of vertical axis (VV) ( Fig. 15A View FIGURE 15 ); ventral edge of shaft curved downward to form the ventral process that is a very small, bluntly rounded point, apex steeply, though asymmetrically curved to form the long and narrow dorsal process ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 PL) with a rounded hook (in line with vertical axis ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ), hook slightly recurved, long and sharply curved to dorsal part of shaft; penis lobe shaft slightly curved to right, only in apical portion (VV), shaft of penis equally narrow ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 PL), overall length slightly curved ventrally apically only (LV). Structures of the endophallus ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ): lateral form of the apex of the central spicule pointed; dorsal form of the apex of the central spicule greatly expanded with projection; setal (scales) coverage of the apical plate extensive (76–100%); size of left setose flange large; size of right setose flange absent. Left paramere basal lobe rectangular with moderate dorsal hump; steeply sloped (60°) to very short and narrow arm; terminal lobe slightly broadened; ventral edge setal distribution as an apical tuft of very sparse (4–6) short setae, then a comb of long setae at armbasal lobe junction ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 LP); ventral edge straight. Right paramere a long and narrow rectangle to ½ length then narrows to terminal end, a double-row of long setae extending along apical ½ of ventral edge ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 RP); terminal ⅓ inwardly curved to penis lobe.
Female genitalia: Basal gonocoxite 1 ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ) long and narrow but broadens apically and flattened, ventral surface smooth, internal dorso-lateral carina with 4 short setae, carina extended inward (dorsal view). Gonocoxite 2 ovate in shape, apical end slightly curved upward (dorsal view). Ramus long and narrow.
Comments: This species is described from 11 specimens collected by pitfall trapping in the Whakaroa S.R. during two different collecting events in 1993/4 and 1994/5.
Distribution: New Zealand, North Island, Gisborne, Waimata Valley, Whakaroa Scenic Reserve.
Holotype: NZAC male labelled. NEW ZEALAND GB Waimata V Whakaroa Scenic Res Saddle 30 Nov 1994 – / 9 Jan 1995 G. Hall Pit traps / HOLOTYPE Mecodema genesispotini n. sp. design. DS Seldon, TR Buckley 2018 [red label].
Paratypes: 1♀, NEW ZEALAND GB Whakaroa Scenic Reserve 22 Nov 1993 — 1 Jan 1994 / G. Hall pit trap ( NZAC) ; 2♂, 3♀ NEW ZEALAND GB Waimata V Whakaroa Scenic Res Saddle 30 Nov 1994 – / 9 Jan 1995 G. Hall Pit traps ( NZAC) ; 2♂, 2♀ NEW ZEALAND GB Whakaroa Scenic Res 22 Nov 1993 – 11 Jan 1994 / G. Hall Pit traps / PARATYPE ( NZAC) .
Etymology: This species is named in honour of the late Genesis Potini, who was a New Zealand speed chess champion from Gisborne. He was also the cofounder of the Gisborne Eastern Knights Chess Club, helping underprivileged Māori children by teaching them how to play chess.
| NZAC |
New Zealand Arthropod Collection |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Tribe |
Broscini |
|
Genus |
