Hymenosomatidae, McLeay, 1838

GUINOT, DANIÈLE, TAVARES, MARCOS & CASTRO, PETER, 2013, Significance of the sexual openings and supplementary structures on the phylogeny of brachyuran crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura), with new nomina for higher-ranked podotreme taxa, Zootaxa 3665 (1), pp. 1-414 : 125-126

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3665.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8358B363-BEE3-416D-96CA-8614E38B61D5

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BB9C75-FF95-FFEF-FF78-FED6FE11F9FF

treatment provided by

Felipe (2021-08-25 03:06:50, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-04 18:44:43)

scientific name

Hymenosomatidae
status

 

Family Hymenosomatidae View in CoL

The short penis emerges from a large gonopore, which opens on the slope of sternite 8 far from suture 7/8, one of the posteriormost locations on sternite 8 among the Brachyura ( Guinot 1979a: fig. 53F; Guinot & Richer de Forges 1997: figs. 6A, 9) (see Modalities of penis protection: “Sternitreme” protection). The distance between the gonopore and the P5 coxa varies among genera, from short as in the cavernicolous Cancrocaeca xenomorpha Ng, 1991 ( Fig. 29A View FIGURE 29 ) to longer as in Odiomaris pilosus ( Fig. 29B View FIGURE 29 ), as a consequence of the broadening of the thoracic sternum (see female sternum, Fig. 48C View FIGURE 48 ). The gonopore is large, as in Limnopilos microrhynchus (Ng, 1995) ( Guinot & Richer de Forges 1997: 475) .

The position of the male gonopore of the hymenosomatids has been a source of confusion, partially due to the small size of individuals, so the taxonomy of these very peculiar crabs has undergone several major changes (see historical account or discussion by Gordon 1940; Melrose 1975; Guinot 1978a, 1979a; Lucas 1980; Rice 1980, 1981a; Feldmann & McLay 1993; Guinot & Richer de Forges 1997). H. Milne Edwards (1837a: 29, 33, 35) assigned Elamena H. Milne Edwards, 1837 , and Hymenosoma Desmarest, 1825 , to his tribe Pinnothériens in the Catometopa on the basis of sternal instead of coxal male gonopores. De Haan (1839: 75, pl. 29, fig. 1) referred to his Majacea “ Ocypode (Elamena) unguiformis ” called in his plates “ Inachus (Elamena) unguiformis ”, now Trigonoplax unguiformis (De Haan, 1839) . Henri Milne Edwards (1852: 103, 183) was in favour of a separate tribe, establishing a link between the Ocypodiens and the Homoliens, but also showing majids traits. Ortmann (1893: 30; 1896: 416, 441, 442) noted the sternal location of male gonopores, comparable to that of Leucosiidae , and chose, however, a placement in Majoidea , perhaps in an “aberrant” group. This was considered “a decided mistake” by Alcock (1900b: 282, 291, 385), who included Hymenosomatidae in the Catometopa. Despite the presence of sternal male gonopores, Rathbun (1925: 561) assigned the family to Majoidea .

Hymenosomatids have often been considered heterotremes, as a family of the Oxyrhyncha Latreille, 1802 ( Shen 1932: 41, 58; as Hymenosomidae ) or Majoidea , hence the common name of “false spider crabs” ( Ng, Guinot & Davie 2008: 108; De Grave et al. 2009: 35; Schweitzer et al. 2010: 93), or in its proximity ( Davie 2002: 342; Poore 2004: 390), or placed in a separate superfamily, Hymenosomatoidea ( Guinot 1978a: 284; Martin & Davis 2001: 74; Chen & Sun 2002: 34; Števčić 2005: 101). But they were also considered thoracotremes, often close to Pinnotheridae ( Haswell 1882; Miers 1886; Alcock 1900b; Garth 1958; Guinot 1978a; McLay 1988; Števčić 1998), even with the genera simply merged into this family ( Dana 1851a, 1852; Hodgson 1902; Hutton 1904; Baker 1906). Most often, their taxonomic position was not given or discussed ( Lucas 1980; Ng & Chuang 1996; Van den Brink 2006; Naruse & Ng 2007a; Naruse, Ng & Guinot 2008; Naruse, Mendoza & Ng 2008; Van den Brink & McLay 2009; McLay & Van den Brink 2009; Naruse & Komai 2009; Teske et al. 2009; Husana et al. 2011).

Tesch (1918: 3) clearly stated that the only character justifying a placement of Hymenosomatidae among the Catometopa was the sternal opening, this trait being “counterbalanced by a whole series of features showing a close relationship to the Oxyrhyncha and especially to the Maiidae”. The dilemma of whether or not there is a true sternal emergence of the male gonopores in hymenosomatids has been discussed by Montgomery (1921: 95) and briefly by Guinot (1979a: 215). According to Richer de Forges (1976, 1977), the Hymenosomatidae was related to Majidae , the sternal emergence of the male openings being considered deceptive. A coxo-sternal, thus heterotreme condition was assumed by Guinot & Richer de Forges (1997) and Guinot & Bouchard (1998) (see also Števčić 2005: 101), who proposed a close relationship between Hymenosomatidae and Inachoididae .

Several dissections demonstrated that the ejaculatory duct was directly connected with the testis instead of perforating the P5 coxa ( Fig. 58A, B View FIGURE 58 ) and thus it was not a coxo-sternal condition. Moreover, the remarkably transparent carapace allowing examination of the male reproductive system of Trigonoplax unguiformis ( Fig. 58E View FIGURE 58 ) unambiguously shows a true sternal emergence of the male duct, analogous to the thoracotreme disposition. Hymenosomatoids are thus problematic because a thoracotreme status cannot be retained and it is evident that there is a close relationship with crabs such as majoids (e.g., inachoidids and inachids) and dorippoids, which indicates a eubrachyuran, heterotreme affiliation. It is therefore assumed that a sternal male gonopore has evolved homoplasically in the Hymenosomatoidea and in the Thoracotremata ( Guinot 2011b). As the Hymenosomatidae is for now the only known family in Hymenosomatoidea , the two nomina are interchangeably used in the present text. See Modalities of penis protection: “Sternitreme” protection; Monophyletic Heterotremata: Superfamily Hymenosomatoidea ; Position of the Hymenosomatoidea within the Brachyura ; Affinities between Dorippoidea and Hymenosomatoidea ; Affinities between Hymenosomatoidea and Inachoididae ; Carcinisation and its outcomes: Cephalic condensation).

Alcock, A. (1900 b) The Brachyura Catometopa, or Grapsoidea. Materials for a carcinological fauna of India. No. 6. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 69 (II, 3), 279 - 456.

Baker, W. H. (1906) Notes on South Australian Decapod Crustacea. Part 1. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 28, 146 - 161.

Chen, H. & Sun, H. (2002) Brachyura. Marine primitive crabs. In: Fauna Sinica, Invertebrata, vol. 30. Arthropoda, Crustacea. Academia Sinica, Science Press, Beijing, China, xiii + 597 pp. [In Chinese with English abstract]

Dana, J. D. (1851 a) On the classification of the maioid Crustacea or Oxyrnhcha. American Journal of Science and Arts, ser. 2, 11, 425 - 434.

Dana, J. D. (1852) Crustacea. Part I. United States Exploring Expedition during the Years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842, under the Command of Charles Wilkes, U. S. N. Philadelphia, Sherman. Vol. 13, i - viii, 1 - 685. Atlas (1855), pp. 1 - 27, pls. 1 - 96.

Davie, P. J. F. (2002) Crustacea: Malacostraca: Eucarida (Part 2): Decapoda-Anomura, Brachyura. In: Wells, A. & Houston, W. W. K. (Eds.) Zological Catalogue of Australia, vol. 19.3 B. CSIRO Publishing Australia, Melbourne, xiv + 641 pp.

De Grave, S., Pontcheff, N. D., Ahyong, S. T., Chan, T. - Y., Crandall, K. A., Dworschak, P. C., Felder, D. L., Feldmann, R. M., Fransen, C. H. J. M., Goulding, L. Y. D., Lemaitre, R., Low, M. E. Y., Martin, J. W., Ng, P. K. L., Schweitzer, C. E., Tan, S. H., Tshudy, D. & Wetzer, R. (2009) A classification of living and fossil genera of decapod crustaceans. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, suppl. 21, 1 - 109.

Desmarest, A. - G. (1825) Considerations Generales sur la Classe des Crustaces, et Description des Especes de ces Animaux, qui Vivent dans la Mer, sur les Cotes, ou dans les Eaux Douces de la France. F. G. Levrault, Paris, xix + 446 pp.

Feldmann, R. M. & McLay, C. L. (1993) Geological history of brachyurans decapods from New Zealand. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 13 (3), 443 - 455.

Garth, J. S. (1958) Brachyura of the Pacific coast of America, Oxyrhyncha. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions, 21 (1), xxii + 499; (2), 501 - 854, pls. A - Z 4, 1 - 55.

Gordon, I. (1940) On some species of the genus Elamena (s. s.) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, 152 (1), 60 - 78.

Guinot, D. (1978 a) Principes d'une classification evolutive des Crustaces Decapodes Brachyoures. Bulletin biologique de la France et de la Belgique, nouv. ser., 112 (3), 211 - 292.

Guinot, D. (1979 a) Donnees nouvelles sur la morphologie, la phylogenese et la taxonomie des Crustaces Decapodes Brachyoures. Memoires du Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, ser. A, Zoologie, 112, 1 - 354.

Guinot, D. & Bouchard, J. - M. (1998) Evolution of the abdominal holding systems of brachyuran crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura). Zoosystema, 20 (4), 613 - 694.

Guinot, D. (2011 b) The position of the Hymenosomatidae MacLeay, 1838, within the Brachyura (Crustacea, Decapoda). Zootaxa, 2890, 40 - 52.

Haswell, W. A. (1882) Catalogue of the Australian Stalk- and Sessile-Eyed Crustacea. F. W. White, Sydney, xxiv + 324 pp.

Hodgson, T. V. (1902) Crustacea. In: Lankester, E. R., Report on the Collections of Natural History made in the Antarctic Regions during the Voyage of the Southern Cross , XI. British Museum, London, pp. 228 - 261.

Husana, D. E. M., Tan, S. H. & Kase, T. (2011) A new genus and species of anchialine Hymenosomatidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) from Samar, Philippines. Zootaxa, 3109, 49 - 59.

Hutton, F. W. (1904) Index Faunae Novae Zelandiae. Dulau, London, 372 pp.

Latreille, P. A. (1802) Histoire Naturelle, Generale et Particuliere des Crustaces et des Insectes. Ouvrage faisant suite a l'Histoire Naturelle Generale et Particuliere, composee par Leclerc de Buffon, et Redigee par C. S. Sonnini, Membre de Plusieurs Societes Savantes. Famille naturelles des genres. Tome troisieme. F. Dufart, Paris, xii + 467 pp. Tome quatrieme. F. Dufart, Paris, 387 pp., pls. 16 - 37 [see Dupuis (1986) for dates of publication]

Lucas, J. S. (1980) Spider crabs of the family Hymenosomatidae (Crustacea: Brachyura) with particular reference to Australian species: Systematics and biology. Records of the Australian Museum, 33 (4), 148 - 247.

Martin, J. W. & Davis, G. E. (2001) An updated classification of the Recent Crustacea. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science Series, 39, 124 pp.

McLay, C. L. (1988) Brachyura and crab-like Anomura of New Zealand. Leigh Laboratory Bulletin, 22, i - v, 1 - 463.

Melrose M. J. (1975) The marine fauna of New Zealand: family Hymenosomatidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura). Memoirs of the New Zealand Oceanographic Institute, 34, 1 - 123.

Miers, E. J. (1886) Report on the Brachyura collected by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873 - 76. In: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H. M. S. Challenger during the Years 1873 - 76 Under the Command of Captain George S. Nares, R. N., F. R. S. and the Late Captain Frank Tourle Thompson, R. N. prepared under the Superintendence of the late Sir C. Wyville Thomson, Knt., F. R. S. & c. Regius Professor of Natural History in the University of Edinburgh, Director of the civilian scientific staff on board and now of John Murray, LL. D., Ph. D., & c. one of the naturalists of the Expedition. Published by Order of Her Majesty's Government. London, Edinburgh and Dublin, Her Majesty Stationery Office. Zoology, 17 (2). 1 + 362 pp., pls. 1 - 29.

Milne Edwards, H. (1852) Observations sur les affinites zoologiques et la classification naturelle des Crustaces. Annales des Sciences naturelles (Zoologie), ser. 3, 18, 109 - 166, pls. 3, 4.

Milne Edwards, A. (1873 - 1880) Etudes sur les Xiphosures et les Crustaces de la Region Mexicaine. In: Mission Scientifique au Mexique et dans l'Amerique Centrale. Recherches Zoologiques pour servir a l'Histoire de la Faune de l'Amerique Centrale et du Mexique. Cinquieme Partie. Imprimerie Nationale, Paris, 368 pp., 61 pls.

Montgomery, S. K. (1921) Some Hymenosomidae from the Swan River. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 6 (2), 93 - 96.

Naruse, T. & Ng, P. K. L. (2007 a) On the taxonomy of the genus Hymenicoides Kemp, 1917 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Hymenosomatidae), with resurrection of Limnopilos Chuang & Ng, 1991, and descriptions of two new species. Zootaxa, 1621, 17 - 31.

Naruse, T., Ng, P. K. L. & Guinot, D. (2008) Two new genera and two new species of troglobitic false spider crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Hymenosomatidae) from Indonesia, with notes on Cancrocaeca Ng, 1991. Zootaxa, 1739, 21 - 40.

Naruse, T., Mendoza, J. C. E. & Ng, P. K. L. (2008) Descriptions of five new species of false spider crabs (Decapoda: Brachyura: Hymenosomatidae) from the Philippines. Marine Biology Research, 4, 429 - 441.

Naruse, T. & Komai, T. (2009) A new species of the false spider crab genus Halicarcinus (Decapoda: Brachyura: Hymenosomatidae) from Okinawa Island, Japan. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science (Tokyo), ser. A, suppl. 3, 175 - 181.

Ng, P. K. L. & Chuang, C. T. N. (1996) The Hymenosomatidae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) of Southeast Asia, with notes on other species. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, suppl. 3, 1 - 82.

Ng, P. K. L., Guinot, D. & Davie, P. J. F. (2008) Systema Brachyurorum: Part 1. An annotated checklist of extant brachyuran crabs of the world. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, suppl. 17, 1 - 286. [updates at http: // rmbr. nus. edu. sg / research / cotw / supplement 17. php]

Ortmann, A. (1893) Die Decapoden-Krebse des Strassburger Museums. VI. Theil. Abtheilung: Brachyura (Brachyura genuina Boas) 1. Unterabtheilung: Majoidea und Cancroidea, 1. Section Portuninea. Zoologische Jahresbucher, Abtheilung fur Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Thiere, 7, 23 - 88.

Ortmann, A. E. (1896) Das System der Decapoden-Krebse. Zoologische Jahrbucher, Abtheilung fur Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Thiere, 9, 409 - 453.

Poore, G. C. B. (2004) Marine Decapod Crustacea of Southern Australia. A Guide to Identification. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Melbourne, 517 pp.

Rathbun, M. J. (1925) The spider crabs of America. United States National Museum Bulletin, 129, xx + 613 pp., pls. 1 - 283. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 03629236.129. i

Rice, A. L. (1980) Crab zoeal morphology and its bearing on the classification of the Brachyura. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London, 35, 271 - 424. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1096 - 3642.1980. tb 00060. x

Rice, A. L. (1981 a) Crab zoeae and brachyuran classification: a re-appraisal. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History, 40 (5), 287 - 296.

Richer de Forges, B. (1976) Etude du crabe des iles Kerguelen Halicarcinus planatus (Fabricius) (Decapoda, Brachyura, Hymenosomatidae). Unpublished doctoral thesis, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris.

Richer de Forges, B. (1977) Etude du crabe des iles Kerguelen Halicarcinus planatus (Fabricius). Bulletin du Comite national Francais de la Recherche antarctique (CNFRA), 42, 71 - 133.

Richer de Forges, B., Jamieson, B. G. M., Guinot, D. & Tudge, C. C. (1997) Ultrastructure of the spermatozoa of Hymenosomatidae (Crustacea: Brachyura) and the relationships of the family. Marine Biology, 130, 233 - 242. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1007 / s 002270050243

Shen, C. - J. (1932) The Brachyuran Crustacea of North China. Zoologia Sinica, ser. A, 9 (1), x + 320 pp.

Stevcic, Z. (1998) Evolutionary arrangement of the brachyuran families together with a checklist. Periodicum Biologorum, 100 (1), 101 - 104.

Stevcic, Z. (2005) The reclassification of brachyuran crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura). Natura Croatica (Fauna Croatica), 14, suppl. 1, 1 - 159.

Teske, P. R., McLay C. L., Sandoval-Castillo, J., Papadopoulos, I., Newman, B. K., Griffiths, C. L., McQuaid, C. D., Barker, N. P, Borgonie, G. & Beheregaray, L. B. (2009) Tri-locus sequence data reject a Gondwanan origin hypothesis for the African / South Pacific crab genus Hymenosoma. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 53, 23 - 33. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1016 / j. ympev. 2009.05.031

Van den Brink, A. M. (2006) The reproductive ecology and biology of the pill-box crab: Halicarcinus cookii Filhol, 1885 (Brachyura: Hymenosomatidae). Unpublished master thesis, Canterbury University, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Van den Brink, A. M. & McLay, C. L. (2009) Use of the sterile male technique to investigate sperm competition in a pill box crab, Halicarcinus cookii Filhol, 1885 (Brachyura: Hymenosomatidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology, 29 (1), 62 - 69. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1651 / 08 - 2989.1

Gallery Image

FIGURE 29. Male gonopore (A, B) and dorsal platelets of the abdomen (C–E) in Hymenosomatidae. A, Cancrocaeca xenomorpha Ng, 1991, male 3.9 × 4.6 mm, paratype, Indonesia, Sulawesi (MNHN-B24450); B, Odiomaris pilosus (A. Milne- Edwards, 1873) (Odiomarinae), male 20.0 × 22.6 mm, New Caledonia (MNHN-B26146); C–E, same data as B: abdomen in dorsal and ventral views; notice on pleotelson (somite 6 fused to telson) the vestigial uropod as intercalated, dorsal platelet, with socket situated beneath, and uropod (D) with electron microscope (all after Guinot & Richer de Forges 1997: figs. 5B–D, 9A, B). a.c., sterno-abdominal cavity; cx5, P5 coxa; g, gonopore; G1, first gonopod; p, uropod as dorsal platelet; pt, pleotelson; s, socket; 6–8, thoracic sternites 6–8; 6/7, 7/8, thoracic sternal sutures 6/7, 7/8. Scale bar: 100µm (E).

Gallery Image

FIGURE 48. Location of vulvae. A–C, anterior displacement: A, Anasimus latus Rathbun, 1894 (Inachoididae), female 18.4 × 14.0 mm, French Guiana (MNHN-B17807); B, Capartiella longipes (Capart, 1951) (Inachidae), ovig. female 9.4 × 8.1 mm, Nigeria (MNHN-B19602). C, Halicarcinus planatus (Fabricius, 1775) (Hymenosomatidae), female 14.0 × 19 mm, South Pacific, Campbell I. (MNHN-B25960) (schematic); D, Hiroia krempfi Fize & Serène, 1956 (Cryptochiridae), female, Palau: vulvae not widely separated and sternal suture 7/8 complete (schematic, modified from Kropp 1990: fig. 6c); E, Pseudohapalocarcinus ransoni (Fize & Serène, 1956) (Cryptochiridae), female, Guam: vulvae located apart on broad thoracic sternite 6 (schematic, modified from Kropp 1990: fig. 12c). j, sternum/pterygostome junction; m.l., median line; v, vulva; 3–8, thoracic sternites 3–8; 4/5–7/8, interrupted thoracic sternal sutures 4/5–7/8; w, sternal wall.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 58. Male reproductive system in Hymenosomatoidea (A, B, E), Pinnotheroidea (C, D), and male gonopores in Cryptochiroidea (F). A, B, dissection of Odiomaris pilosus (A. Milne-Edwards, 1873), male 11.0 × 14.0 mm, New Caledonia, Wé Waalu River (MNHN-B32604): ejaculatory duct and penis (highlighted in B); C, D, dissection of Dissodactylus crinitichelis Moreira, 1901, male 4.6 × 7.0 mm, Brazil (MZUSP 24231): ejaculatory duct (highlighted in D). E, testis and vas deferens as seen through the transparent carapace of Trigonoplax unguiformis (De Haan, 1839), male 6.1 × 7.3 mm, Western Australia (USNM 184973); F, Utinomiella dimorpha (Henderson, 1906): male gonopores perforating sternite 8 far from suture 7/8 (modified from Henderson 1906: pl. 8, fig. 8, as Cryptochirus dimorphus). cx1, cx5, P1, P5 coxae; e.d., ejaculatory duct; g, gonopore; p, penis; t, testis; 4–8, thoracic sternites 4–8; 4/5–7/8, interrupted thoracic sternal sutures 4/5–7/8. Scale bars: 1 mm (A, B); 4 mm (C, D).