Fabalicypris parva Wang, 1978
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2012.19 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:893DB151-7B86-485C-932F-A01C57B20316 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3858792 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BB2C0F-FF9A-4E12-D417-F569FC0033DD |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Fabalicypris parva Wang, 1978 |
status |
|
Fig. 11I View Fig
Fabalicypris parva Wang, 1978: 293 , pl. 2, figs 12a-b, 13a-b.
Fabalicypris hungarica Kozur, 1985: 82 , pl. 2, figs 2, 9, 10.
Bairdiacypris opulenta – Shi & Chen 1987: 51, pl. 13, fig. 10. Fabalicypris parva – Crasquin-Soleau et al. 2004: 286, pl. 3, figs 4-5. — Mette 2008: pl. 2, fig. 8 - Crasquin et al. 2010: 353, fig. 9A’-B’.
Localities
- Wujiaping Formation (sample 05PAJ26), Dajiang section (25°33’56’’N- 106°39’41’’E), Guizhou Province, South China, Changhsingian, Late Permian.
- Longtan and Changxing Formations, Guizhou and Yunnan Provinces, South China, Wuchiapingian and Changhsingian, Late Permian ( Wang 1978).
- Bükk Mountains, Hungary, Late Moscovian, Carboniferous, Late Permian ( Kozur 1985).
- Changxing formation, Meishan section, Zhejiang Province, South China, Changhsingian, Late Permian ( Shi & Chen 1987; Crasquin et al. 2010).
- Çürük dağ section, Western Taurus, Turkey, Wuchiapingian and Changhsingian, Late Permian ( Crasquin-Soleau et al. 2004).
- Zal section, Iran, Changhsingian, Late Permian ( Mette 2008).
Remarks
According to previously published records of Fabalicypris parva Wang, 1978 , this species is known from the Late Moscovian (Carboniferous; Kozur 1985) to the Changhsingian (Late Permian; Wang 1978; Shi & Chen 1987; Crasquin-Soleau et al. 2004; Mette 2008; Crasquin et al. 2010). This long stratigraphic range is suspicious: most of the occurrences being late Permian in age, the Carboniferous one seems questionable. When defining F. hungarica Kozur, 1985 as a synonym of F. parva Wang, 1978 , Crasquin et al. (2010) stated that F. hungarica had a more rounded PB and a maximum of convexity located higher than F. parva . However, because all intermediate shapes between the 2 species were available, they considered all the specimens as belonging to the same species. This observation together with the long stratigraphic repartition of the species seems to indicate an evolutionary trend within one single species. More material is necessary to test this hypothesis.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Fabalicypris parva Wang, 1978
Forel, Marie-Béatrice 2012 |
Bairdiacypris opulenta
Crasquin S. & Forel M. B. & Feng Q. & Yuan A. & Baudin F. & Collin P. Y. 2010: 353 |
Crasquin-Soleau S. & Marcoux J. & Angiolini L. & Richoz S. & Nicora A. & Baud A. & Bertho Y. 2004: 286 |
Shi C. G. & Chen D. Q. 1987: 51 |
Mette 2008 |
Fabalicypris hungarica
Kozur H. 1985: 82 |
Fabalicypris parva
Wang S. 1978: 293 |