Loboscelidia, Westwood, 1874
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.887.2203 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:788AE14A-0698-4C42-819C-BC2412F76FCA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8224896 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BAC057-6E35-3629-9723-FD60FBC78959 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2023-08-07 19:45:58, last updated 2024-11-26 05:02:31) |
scientific name |
Loboscelidia |
status |
|
Loboscelidia View in CoL View at ENA cilia sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:600A8093-65A6-425E-B4E7-8FA7A7531515
Figs 6 View Fig , 25C View Fig
Etymology
Named after the Latin ‘ cilia ’, meaning ‘eyelash’, referring to the conspicuous setae on the eye.
Type material
Holotype VIETNAM • ♂; Thua Thien Hue Province, Bach Ma NP , 19 km point; 16.198° N, 107.860° E; 2 Aug. 2016; T. Mita leg.; VNMN. GoogleMaps
Description
Male ( Fig. 6A View Fig )
MEASUREMENTS. Body length 3.1 mm; forewing length 3.0 mm.
HEAD. Head ( Fig. 6B–D View Fig ) 2.0 times as long as high, 1.2 times as long as wide; inner ocular length 0.66 times as long as head width; frontal projection rectangular in frontal view ( Fig. 6B View Fig ); frons polished and unpunctured, with high ridge extending from behind posterior ocellus along inner orbit of eye ( Fig. 6C View Fig ); frons with distinct frontal line ( Fig. 6C View Fig ); spraclypeal area with transverse carinae ( Fig. 6B View Fig ); temple 2.0 times as long as MOD ( Fig. 6C View Fig ); POL 1.1 times as long as MOD; OOL 1.8 times as long as MOD; LOL 0.5 times as long as MOD; behind ocelli with transverse depression ( Fig. 6C View Fig ); cervical expansion strongly convex in lateral view ( Fig. 6D View Fig ); basal part of cervical expansion constricted strongly in dorsal view ( Fig. 6C View Fig ); scape 3.5 times as long as wide; scape smooth, without longitudinal grooves; scape with transparent flange, 0.7 times as long as tubular part of scape, 0.14 times as wide as tubular part of scape; F1 2.3 times as long as wide; F2 2.5 times as long as wide; F11 3.1 times as long as wide; relative length of F1–F11: 1.1: 1.1: 1.1: 1.1: 1.1: 1.0: 1.0: 1.0: 1.0: 1.1: 1.5.
MESOSOMA. Pronotum 0.68 times as long as posterior width of pronotum ( Fig. 6E View Fig ); posterior width of pronotum 1.4 times as wide as anterior width and 1.1 times as wide as head width; dorsolateral surface of pronotum rounded ( Fig. 6F View Fig ); notauli of scutum slightly curved, not reaching posterior margin ( Fig. 6F View Fig ); scutum between notauli punctured ( Fig. 6F View Fig ); scutellum punctured, with lateral carina ( Fig. 6F View Fig ); scrobal sulcus present, deeply depressed ( Fig. 6A View Fig ); apico-lateral area of scutellum without longitudinal carina ( Fig. 6F View Fig ); metanotum with medial ridge, 0.44 times as long as scutellum ( Fig. 6F View Fig ); propodeal angle strongly developed; upper area of propodeum without transverse carina; propodeum without transverse carina above foramen.
WINGS. Forewing ( Fig. 6G View Fig ) with M curved; cu-a 1.2 times as long as R; A as long as Cu+M; R1 as long as R; Rs 4.3 times as long as R.
LEGS. Tibiae carinate; flange on forefemur 0.29 times longer, 0.73 times wider than tubular part of forefemur; flange on foretibia 0.51 times longer, 0.33 times wider than tubular part of foretibia; flange on midfemur 0.27 times longer, 0.40 times wider than tubular part of midfemur; flange on midtibia 0.42 times longer, 0.33 times wider than tubular part of midtibia; hindcoxa 1.7 times as long as hind trochanter; hindcoxa dorso-laterally carinate; basal part of hindfemur strongly producing; hindfemur basally stout, apparently wider than distal part; ventral margin of hindfemur flat; flange on hindfemur 0.69 times longer, 0.67 times wider than tubular part of hindfemur; outer surface of hindtibia smooth; flange on hindtibia 0.54 times longer, as wide as tubular part of hindtibia.
METASOMA. Lateral margin of T1 with low ridge.
PILOSITY. Frons with sparse erect simple setae ( Fig. 6C View Fig ); eye with sparse erect simple setae ( Fig. 6B–C View Fig ); temple with sparse erect simple setae ( Fig. 6C View Fig ); lower gena with sparse erect simple setae ( Fig. 6D View Fig ); scape with sparse suberect and erect simple setae ( Fig. 6B View Fig ); pedicel with sparse erect simple setae; dorsal part of pronotum with sparse decumbent and erect simple setae; scutum with sparse erect simple setae; tegula with sparse erect simple setae; lateral side of scutellum with sparse decumbent simple setae; midtibia with sparse erect simple setae; hindtibia with sparse erect simple setae; lateral margin of T2 with sparse erect simple setae.
COLORATION. Body reddish brown; antenna reddish brown; legs reddish brown; ribbon-like setae yellowish brown; ribbon-like setae yellow.
Female
Unknown.
Distribution
Vietnam (Central Vietnam) ( Fig. 26 View Fig ).
Remarks
Loboscelidia cilia sp. nov. resembles L. reducta and L. cinnamonea Kimsey, 2012 in having the following characteristics: strongly convex cervical expansion, with transverse carina behind ocelii, without tibial flanges. However, L. cilia sp. nov. can be distinguished by the following characteristers: erect setae on the eye (without setae in the other two species); complete M vein (absent in L. reducta ); and cu-a and R1 present (cu-a absent in the other two species, R1 absent in L. cinnamonea ).
Kimsey L. S. 2012. Review of the odd chrysidid genus Loboscelidia Westwood, 1874 (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae, Loboscelidiinae). ZooKeys 213: 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 213.2985
Fig. 6. Loboscelidia cilia sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (VNMN). A. Lateral habitus. B. Head, frontal view. C. Head, dorsal view. D. Head, lateral view. E. Pronotum, dorsal view. F. Mesosoma, dorsal view. G. Forewing. Scale bars: A, D–G = 0.5 mm; B–C = 0.2 mm.
Fig. 25. Hind tarsal claw of Loboscelidia Westwood, 1874. A. L. bachmaensis sp. nov. B. L. barbata sp. nov. C. L. cilia sp. nov. D. L. convexa sp. nov. E. L. cucphuongensis sp. nov. F. L. cuneata sp. nov. G. L. do sp. nov. H. L. flavipes sp. nov. I. L. fulgens Kimsey, 2012. J. L. glabra sp. nov. K. L. komedai sp. nov. L. L. mediata sp. nov. M. L. parallela sp. nov. N. L. piriformis sp. nov. O. L. squamosa sp. nov. P. L. vang sp. nov. Q. L. vietnamensis sp. nov.
VNMN |
Vietnam National Museum of Nature |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Apocrita |
SuperFamily |
Chrysidoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Loboscelidiinae |
1 (by felipe, 2023-08-07 19:45:58)
2 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-08-07 19:59:47)
3 (by felipe, 2023-08-08 12:59:56)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-08-08 13:14:34)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-08-08 13:23:27)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-08-17 14:41:09)
7 (by plazi, 2023-11-09 17:36:58)