Loboscelidia flavipes, Hisasue & Pham & Mita, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.887.2203 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:788AE14A-0698-4C42-819C-BC2412F76FCA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8224902 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7E033E15-9CF0-4E63-8F74-294C76C6C2EA |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:7E033E15-9CF0-4E63-8F74-294C76C6C2EA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2023-08-07 19:45:58, last updated 2024-11-26 05:02:31) |
scientific name |
Loboscelidia flavipes |
status |
sp. nov. |
Loboscelidia flavipes sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7E033E15-9CF0-4E63-8F74-294C76C6C2EA
Figs 12 View Fig , 25H View Fig
Etymology
Named after the Latin ‘ flava ’, meaning ‘yellow’, and ‘ pes ’, meaning ‘foot’, referring to the pale-yellow legs.
Type material
Holotype VIETNAM • ♂; Ninh Binh Province, Cuc Phuong NP ; 20°21′01.9″ N, 105°35′37.0″ E; 24 Jul. 2010; T. Mita leg.; VNMN. GoogleMaps
Description
Male ( Fig. 12A View Fig )
MEASUREMENTS. Body length 3.1 mm; forewing length 3.2 mm.
HEAD. Head ( Fig. 12B–D View Fig ) 2.0 times as long as high, 1.3 times as long as wide; inner ocular length 0.58 times as long as head width; frontal projection rectangular in frontal view ( Fig. 12B View Fig ); apical margion of frontal projection straight ( Fig. 12C View Fig ); frons granulate, finely microstriate ( Fig. 12C View Fig ); frons with low ridge extending from vertex along inner orbit of eye ( Fig. 12C View Fig ); spraclypeal area without transverse carinae ( Fig. 12B View Fig ); temple 0.80 times as long as MOD ( Fig. 12C View Fig ); POL as long as MOD; OOL 1.4 times as long as MOD; LOL 0.4 times as long as MOD; behind ocelli without transverse depression ( Fig. 12C View Fig ); cervical expansion convex in lateral view ( Fig. 12D View Fig ); basal part of cervical expansion parallel in dorsal view ( Fig. 12C View Fig ); scape 2.8 times as long as wide; scape with longitudinal grooves; scape with transparent flange; F1 1.9 times as long as wide; F2 1.8 times as long as wide; F11 3.6 times as long as wide; relative length of F1–F11: 1.2: 1.1: 1.1: 1.1: 1.0: 1.0: 1.1: 1.1: 1.2: 1.1: 1.7.
MESOSOMA. Pronotum 0.83 times as long as posterior width of pronotum ( Fig. 12E View Fig ); posterior width of pronotum 1.5 times as wide as anterior width and as wide as head width; dorsolateral surface of pronotum carinate ( Fig. 12A View Fig ); notauli of scutum slightly curved, reaching posterior margin ( Fig. 12F View Fig ); scrobal sulcus absent ( Fig. 12A View Fig ); scutellum polished and impunctured, without lateral carina ( Fig. 12F View Fig ); metanotum with two ridges, 0.43 times as long as scutellum ( Fig. 12F View Fig ); propodeal angle strongly developed; upper area of propodeum without transverse carina; propodeum without transverse carina above foramen.
WINGS. Forewing ( Fig. 12G View Fig ) with M curved; cu-a 0.50 times as long as R; A extending half of Cu+M; R1 0.42 times as long as R; Rs 3.6 times as long as R.
LEGS. Tibiae carinate; flange on forefemur 0.59 times longer, 1.3 times wider than tubular part of forefemur; flange on foretibia 0.42 times longer, 0.67 times wider than tubular part of foretibia; flange on midfemur 0.37 times longer, 1.6 times wider than tubular part of midfemur; flange on midtibia 0.50 times longer, 0.67 times wider than tubular part of midtibia; hindcoxa 1.9 times as long as hind trochanter; hindcoxa dorso-laterally carinate; basal part of hindfemur producing; hindfemur basally not stout, as wide as distal part; ventral margin of hindfemur flat; flange on hindfemur 0.66 times longer, as wide as tubular part of hindfemur; outer surface of hindtibia smooth; flange on hindtibia 0.80 times longer, 1.5 times wider than tubular part of hindtibia.
PILOSITY. Lower gena with sparse decumbent cuneate setae ( Fig. 12D View Fig ); hypostoma with sparse decumbent cuneate setae; foretibia with sparse decumbent and suberect simple and cuneate setae; midcoxa with sparse decumbent cuneate setae; midfemur and midtibia with sparse decumbent and suberect simple and cuneate setae; hindcoxa with sparse decumbent cuneate setae; hindfemur and hindtibia with sparse decumbent and suberect simple setae.
COLORATION. Body yellowish brown; antenna yellowish brown; legs yellowish brown; ribbon-like setae whitish yellow.
Female
Unknown.
Distribution
Vietnam (Northern Vietnam) ( Fig. 27 View Fig ).
Remarks
Loboscelidia flapives sp. nov. resembles L. vietnamensis sp. nov. and L. bachmaensis sp. nov. in having the following characteristics: frons microstriate; cervical expansion weakly convex; F1 less than twice as long as wide; and Rs more than 3.0 times as long as R ( L. vietnamensis sp. nov.). However, L. flavipes sp. nov. can be distinguished by the following characteristics: yellow body color (red or reddish brown in the other two species); temple more than 0.50 times as long as MOD ( L. vietnamensis sp. nov. less than 0.30 times as long as R); POL as long as MOD ( L. vietnamensis sp. nov. shorter than MOD, L. bachmaensis sp. nov. longer than MOD); pronotum narrower than head (wider than head in L. bachmaensis sp. nov.); and cu-a 0.50 times as long as R (nearly 0.30 times as long as R in other two species).
Fig. 12. Loboscelidia flavipes sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (VNMN). A. Lateral habitus. B. Head, frontal view. C. Head, dorsal view. D. Head, lateral view. E. Pronotum, dorsal view. F. Mesosoma, dorsal view. G. Forewing. Scale bars: A, E–G = 0.5 mm; B–D = 0.2 mm.
Fig. 25. Hind tarsal claw of Loboscelidia Westwood, 1874. A. L. bachmaensis sp. nov. B. L. barbata sp. nov. C. L. cilia sp. nov. D. L. convexa sp. nov. E. L. cucphuongensis sp. nov. F. L. cuneata sp. nov. G. L. do sp. nov. H. L. flavipes sp. nov. I. L. fulgens Kimsey, 2012. J. L. glabra sp. nov. K. L. komedai sp. nov. L. L. mediata sp. nov. M. L. parallela sp. nov. N. L. piriformis sp. nov. O. L. squamosa sp. nov. P. L. vang sp. nov. Q. L. vietnamensis sp. nov.
VNMN |
Vietnam National Museum of Nature |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Apocrita |
SuperFamily |
Chrysidoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Loboscelidiinae |
Genus |
1 (by felipe, 2023-08-07 19:45:58)
2 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-08-07 19:59:47)
3 (by felipe, 2023-08-08 12:59:56)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-08-08 13:14:34)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-08-08 13:23:27)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-08-17 14:41:09)
7 (by plazi, 2023-11-09 17:36:58)