Loboscelidia fulgens Kimsey, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.887.2203 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:788AE14A-0698-4C42-819C-BC2412F76FCA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8224906 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BAC057-6E22-363A-9714-FE2FFC778C0D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2023-08-07 19:45:58, last updated 2024-11-26 05:02:31) |
scientific name |
Loboscelidia fulgens Kimsey, 2012 |
status |
|
Loboscelidia fulgens Kimsey, 2012 View in CoL
Figs 2C View Fig , 3B View Fig , 13 View Fig , 25I View Fig
Loboscelidia fulgens Kimsey, 2012: 16 View in CoL View Cited Treatment .
Holotype ♂; Vietnam: Tuyen Quang Province, Na Hang Nature Reserve ( CNC).
Material examined
Paratypes VIETNAM • 1 ♂; Ha Tinh province, Huong Son ; 450 m a.s.l.; 18°22′ N, 105°13′ E; 22 Apr.–1 May 1998; L. Herman leg.; light trap; CNC GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Tuyen Quang province, Na Hang Reserve ; 360 m a.s.l.; 16–20 May 1997; S.B. Peck leg.; FIT; CNC .
Non-type
VIETNAM • 5 ♂♂; Bac Giang Province, Tay Yen Tu NR ; 21°10′52.33″ N, 106°43′24.3″ E; 9 Jul. 2014; T. Mita leg.; VNMN GoogleMaps • 5 ♂♂; same locality data as for preceding but 21°11′3.65″ N; 106°44′42.44″ E; 10 Jul. 2014; K. Tsujii leg.; VNMN GoogleMaps .
Description
Male ( Fig. 13A View Fig )
MEASUREMENTS. Body length 2.4–3.1 mm; forewing length 2.7–3.2 mm.
HEAD. Head ( Fig. 13B–D View Fig ) 1.8 times as long as high, 1.1 times as long as wide; inner ocular length 0.67 times as long as head width; frontal projection rectangular in frontal view ( Fig. 13C View Fig ); apical margion of frontal projection depressed ( Fig. 13D View Fig ); frons polished and unpunctured ( Fig. 13D View Fig ); frons with low ridge extending from median ocellus along inner orbit of eye ( Fig. 13D View Fig ); frons with indistinct carinae towards median ocellus ( Fig. 13C View Fig ); frons with distinct frontal line; spraclypeal area with transverse carinae; temple 0.64 times as long as MOD ( Fig. 13D View Fig ); POL 1.2 times as long as MOD; OOL as long as MOD; LOL 0.40 times as long as MOD; behind ocelli with transverse depression; cervical expansion convex in lateral view ( Fig. 13B View Fig ); basal part of cervical expansion constricted in dorsal view ( Fig. 13D View Fig ); scape 3.6 times as long as wide; scape with longitudinal grooves; F1 2.2 times as long as wide; F2 1.8 times as long as wide; F11 3.0 times as long as wide; relative length of F1–F11: 1.3: 1.1: 1.0: 1.0: 1.0: 1.1: 1.0: 1.1: 1.1: 1.1: 1.6.
MESOSOMA. Pronotum 0.81 times as long as posterior width of pronotum ( Fig. 13F View Fig ); posterior width of pronotum 1.3 times as wide as anterior width and 0.90 times as wide as head width; dorsolateral surface of pronotum rounded ( Fig. 13A View Fig ); notauli of scutum slightly curved, reaching posterior margin ( Fig. 13G View Fig ); scutellum polished, with lateral carina ( Fig. 13G View Fig ); apico-lateral area of scutellum without longitudinal carina ( Fig. 13G View Fig ); scrobal sulcus absent ( Fig. 13A View Fig ); metanotum with two ridges; metanotum 0.31 times as long as scutellum ( Fig. 13G View Fig ); propodeal angle weakly developed; propodeum without transverse carina above foramen.
WINGS. Forewing ( Fig. 13E View Fig ) with M absent; cu-a absent; A extending half of Cu+M; R1 0.33 times as long as R; Rs 1.7 times as long as R.
LEGS. Tibiae carinate; flange on forefemur 0.35 times longer, as wide as tubular part of forefemur; flange on foretibia 0.34 times longer, 0.33 times wider than tubular part of foretibia; flange on midfemur 0.66 times longer, 0.70 times wider than tubular part of midfemur; flange on midtibia 0.58 times longer, 0.33 times wider than tubular part of midtibia; hindcoxa 2.3 times as long as hind trochanter; hindcoxa dorso-laterally carinate; basal part of hindfemur simple; hindfemur basally not stout, as wide as distal part; ventral margin of hindfemur swollen; flange on hindfemur 0.48 times longer, as wide as tubular part of hindfemur; outer surface of hindtibia smooth; flange on hindtibia 0.54 times longer, 0.75 times wider than tubular part of hindtibia.
PILOSITY. Forecoxa with sparse decumbent simple setae; foretibia with sparse decumbent and erect simple setae; midcoxa with sparse decumbent simple setae; midfemur with sparse decumbent and suberect simple setae; midtibia with sparse decumbent and suberect simple setae; hindcoxa with sparse decumbent simple setae; hindfemur with sparse decumbent cuneate setae; hindtibia with sparse decumbent and suberect simple setae.
COLORATION. Body yellowish brown; antenna yellowish brown; legs yellowish brown; ribbon-like setae whitish yellow.
Female
Unknown.
Distribution
Vietnam (Northern Vietnam, Central Vietnam) ( Fig. 27 View Fig ).
Remarks
Loboscelidia fulgens shares a completely lacking M vein with L. bakeri Fouts, 1922 , L. guangxiensis Xu, Weng & He, 2006 and L. reducta . However, L. fulgens can be distinguished from the three species by the following characteristics: head wider than posterior width of pronotum (narrower than posterior width of pronotum in L. bakeri and L. reducta ); R1 0.30 times as long as R (more than 0.50 times as long as R in L. guangxiensis ); a flange on hindtibia more than 0.50 times as wide as tubular part of hindtibia (less wide than hindtibia in L. guangxiensis ); well-developed tibial flanges (lacking in L. reducta ); and propodeum without a transverse carina (with the carina in L. bakeri ).
Fouts R. M. 1922. New parasitic Hymenoptera from the Oriental islands. The Philippine Journal of Science 20: 619 - 637. https: // doi. org / 10.5281 / zenodo. 26811
Kimsey L. S. 2012. Review of the odd chrysidid genus Loboscelidia Westwood, 1874 (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae, Loboscelidiinae). ZooKeys 213: 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 213.2985
Fig. 2. Hindfemora of Loboscelidia Westwood, 1874. A. L. vietnamensis sp. nov. B. L. parallela sp. nov. C. L. fulgens Kimsey, 2012. D. L. mediata sp. nov.
Fig. 3. Forewing venation of Loboscelidia Westwood, 1874. A. L. barbata sp. nov. B. L. fulgens Kimsey, 2012.
Fig. 13. Loboscelidia fulgens Kimsey, 2012, ♂ (VNMN). A. Lateral habitus. B. Head, lateral view. C. Head, frontal view. D. Head, dorsal view. E. Forewing. F. Pronotum, dorsal view. G. Mesosoma, dorsal view. Scale bars: A, E–G = 0.5 mm; B = 0.1 mm; C–D = 0.2 mm.
Fig. 25. Hind tarsal claw of Loboscelidia Westwood, 1874. A. L. bachmaensis sp. nov. B. L. barbata sp. nov. C. L. cilia sp. nov. D. L. convexa sp. nov. E. L. cucphuongensis sp. nov. F. L. cuneata sp. nov. G. L. do sp. nov. H. L. flavipes sp. nov. I. L. fulgens Kimsey, 2012. J. L. glabra sp. nov. K. L. komedai sp. nov. L. L. mediata sp. nov. M. L. parallela sp. nov. N. L. piriformis sp. nov. O. L. squamosa sp. nov. P. L. vang sp. nov. Q. L. vietnamensis sp. nov.
CNC |
Canada, Ontario, Ottawa, Canadian National Collection of Insects |
FIT |
FIT |
VNMN |
Vietnam National Museum of Nature |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Apocrita |
SuperFamily |
Chrysidoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Loboscelidiinae |
Genus |
Loboscelidia fulgens Kimsey, 2012
Hisasue, Yu, Pham, Thai-Hong & Mita, Toshiharu 2023 |
1 (by felipe, 2023-08-07 19:45:58)
2 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-08-07 19:59:47)
3 (by felipe, 2023-08-08 12:59:56)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-08-08 13:14:34)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-08-08 13:23:27)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-08-17 14:41:09)
7 (by plazi, 2023-11-09 17:36:58)