Loboscelidia glabra, Hisasue & Pham & Mita, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.887.2203 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:788AE14A-0698-4C42-819C-BC2412F76FCA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8224908 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DA75CC25-7D50-4004-85C0-7AF48829DDE0 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:DA75CC25-7D50-4004-85C0-7AF48829DDE0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Loboscelidia glabra |
status |
sp. nov. |
Loboscelidia glabra sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:DA75CC25-7D50-4004-85C0-7AF48829DDE0
Figs 14 View Fig , 25J View Fig
Etymology
Named after the Latin ‘ glaber ’, meaning ‘hairless’, referring to the eye without setae of the holotype.
Type material
Holotype VIETNAM • ♀; Ninh Binh Province, Cuc Phuong NP ; 24–25 Aug. 2019; Y. Hisasue et al. leg.; FIT; VNMN.
Description
Female ( Fig. 14A View Fig )
MEASUREMENTS. Body length 3.6 mm; forewing length 2.7 mm.
HEAD. Head ( Fig. 14B–D View Fig ) 1.8 times as long as high, 1.4 times as long as wide; inner ocular length 0.67 times as long as head width; frontal projection rectangular in frontal view ( Fig. 14B View Fig ); apical margin of frontal projection depressed ( Fig. 14C View Fig ); frons granulate, microstriae ( Fig. 14C View Fig ); frons without ridge along inner orbit of eye ( Fig. 14C View Fig ); frons with distinct carinae towards median ocellus ( Fig. 14C View Fig ); spraclypeal area with transverse carinae ( Fig. 14B View Fig ); temple 1.1 times as long as MOD ( Fig. 14C View Fig ); POL 1.2 times as long as MOD; OOL 2.5 times as long as MOD; LOL 0.48 times as long as MOD; behind ocelli with transverse depression ( Fig. 14C View Fig ); cervical expansion weakly convex in lateral view ( Fig. 14D View Fig ); basal part of cervical expansion strongly constricted in dorsal view ( Fig. 14C View Fig ); scape 2.6 times as long as wide; scape longitudinally carinate, without flange; F1 0.88 times as long as wide; F2 0.63 times as long as wide; F11 0.82 times as long as wide; relative length of F1–F11: 1.8: 1.4: 1.0: 1.0: 1.0: 1.0: 1.2: 1.2: 1.2: 1.2: 2.2.
MESOSOMA. Pronotum 0.70 times as long as posterior width of pronotum ( Fig. 14F View Fig ); posterior width of pronotum 1.4 times as wide as anterior width and 1.3 times as wide as head width; dorsolateral surface of pronotum carinate ( Fig. 14A View Fig ); notauli parallel, reaching posterior margin ( Fig. 14G View Fig ); scutellum polished and punctured ( Fig. 14G View Fig ); scrobal sulcus present, weakly depressed ( Fig. 14A View Fig ); metanotum with medial ridge, 0.41 times as long as scutellum ( Fig. 14G View Fig ); propodeal angle weakly developed; propodeum without transverse carina above foramen.
WINGS. Forewing ( Fig. 14E View Fig ) with M curved; cu-a 0.51 times as long as R; A extending half of Cu+M; R1 0.63 times as long as R; Rs 2.9 times as long as R.
LEGS. Tibiae carinate; flange on forefemur 0.69 times longer, 1.3 times wider than tubular part of forefemur; flange on foretibia 0.67 times longer, 1.8 times wider than tubular part of foretibia; flange on midfemur 0.66 times longer, 0.8 times wider than tubular part of midfemur; flange on midtibia 0.61 times longer, 1.6 times wider than tubular part of midtibia; hind coxa dorso-laterally carinate; basal part of hindfemur strongly producing; hindfemur basally stout, apparently wider than distal part; ventral margin of hindfemur flat; outer surface of hindfemur smooth; flange on hindfemur 0.52 times longer, as wide as tubular part of hindfemur; outer surface of hindtibia smooth; flange on hindtibia 0.73 times longer, 0.78 times wider than tubular part of hindtibia; hind tarsal claw without median tooth ( Fig. 25J View Fig ).
PILOSITY. Gena with sparse suberect simple setae ( Fig. 14D View Fig ); hypostoma with sparse suberect simple setae; scape and pedicel with sparse decumbent cuneate setae; dorsal and lateral surfaces of pronotum with sparse decumbent cuneate setae ( Fig. 14F View Fig ); propleuron with sparse suberect simple setae; scutum, mesopleuron and metanotum with sparse decumbent cuneate setae ( Fig. 14A, G View Fig ); tegula with sparse suberect simple setae ( Fig. 14G View Fig ); scutellum with sparse decumbent cuneate setae ( Fig. 14G View Fig ); dorsal surface of propodeum almost asetose; lateral and posterior parts of propodeum with sparse decumbent cuneate setae; forecoxa and foretrochanter with sparse suberect simple setae; foretibia with sparse decumbent and suberect simple and cuneate setae; midleg with sparse decumbent and suberect simple and cuneate setae; hindleg with sparse decumbent and suberect simple and cuneate setae.
COLORATION. Body reddish brown; antenna reddish brown; legs reddish brown; flanges yellowish brown; ribbon-like setae whitish yellow.
Male
Unknown.
Distribution
Vietnam (Northern Vietnam) (Fig, 27).
Remarks
Loboscelidia glabra sp. nov. resembles L. antennata Fouts, 1922 and L. hei Yao, Liu & Xu, 2010 ; however, L. glabra sp. nov. has eyes without setae (with erect setae in L. antennata ); pronotum 0.80 times as long as wide (0.60 times as long as wide in L. antennata ); shorter F11 0.80 times as long as wide (1.2 times as long as wide in L. hei ); and a narrow hindtibial flange, 0.80 times as wide as the tubular part (as wide as the tubular part in L. hei ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Apocrita |
SuperFamily |
Chrysidoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Loboscelidiinae |
Genus |