Loboscelidia parallela, Hisasue & Pham & Mita, 2023

Hisasue, Yu, Pham, Thai-Hong & Mita, Toshiharu, 2023, Taxonomic revision of the genus Loboscelidia Westwood, 1874 (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae: Loboscelidiinae) from Vietnam, European Journal of Taxonomy 887 (1), pp. 1-68 : 41-43

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.887.2203

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:788AE14A-0698-4C42-819C-BC2412F76FCA

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8224870

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D512C463-0D4E-4D9F-98A2-3EC86F9D3141

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:D512C463-0D4E-4D9F-98A2-3EC86F9D3141

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Loboscelidia parallela
status

sp. nov.

Loboscelidia parallela sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D512C463-0D4E-4D9F-98A2-3EC86F9D3141

Figs 2B View Fig , 18 View Fig , 25M View Fig

Etymology

Named after the Latin ‘ parallela ’, meaning ‘parallel’, referring to the parallel cervical expansion.

Type material

Holotype VIETNAM • ♂; Bac Giang Province, Tay Yen Tu NR ; 21°10′52.33″ N, 106°43′24.3″ E; 9 Jul. 2014; T. Mita leg.; VNMN. GoogleMaps

Paratype VIETNAM • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; VNMN GoogleMaps .

Description

Male ( Fig. 18A View Fig )

MEASUREMENTS. Body length 3.2 mm; forewing length 3.2 mm.

HEAD. Head ( Fig. 18B–D View Fig ) 1.9 times as long as high, 1.3 times as long as wide; inner ocular length 0.61 times as long as head width; frontal projection rectangular in frontal view ( Fig. 18B View Fig ); apical margion of frontal projection depressed ( Fig. 18C View Fig ); frons granulate, with microstriae ( Fig. 18C View Fig ); frons with low ridge extending from vertex along inner orbit of eye ( Fig. 18C View Fig ); spraclypeal area with transverse carinae ( Fig. 18B View Fig ); temple as long as MOD ( Fig. 18C View Fig ); POL 1.2 times as long as MOD; OOL 1.7 times as long as MOD; LOL 0.2 times as long as MOD; behind ocelli without transverse depression ( Fig. 18C View Fig ); cervical expansion flattened in lateral view ( Fig. 18D View Fig ); basal part of cervical expansion parallel in dorsal view ( Fig. 18C View Fig ); scape 3.1 times as long as wide; scape with longitudinal grooves; scape with transparent flange; F1 2.0 times as long as wide; F2 1.8 times as long as wide; F11 3.3 times as long as wide; relative length of F1–F11: 1.2: 1.0: 1.1: 1.0: 1.0: 0.9: 1.1: 1.1: 1.1: 1.0: 1.5.

MESOSOMA. Pronotum 0.78 times as long as posterior width of pronotum ( Fig. 18E View Fig ); posterior width of pronotum 1.4 times as wide as anterior width and 1.1 times as wide as head width; dorsolateral surface of pronotum carinate ( Fig. 18A View Fig ); notauli of scutum slightly curved, reaching posterior margin ( Fig. 18F View Fig ); scutellum polished, with lateral carina ( Fig. 18F View Fig ); apico-lateral area of scutellum with longitudinal grooves ( Fig. 18F View Fig ); metanotum with two ridges ( Fig. 18F View Fig ); scrobal sulcus present, weakly depressed ( Fig. 18A View Fig ); metanotum 0.51 times as long as scutellum ( Fig. 18F View Fig ); propodeal angle weakly developed; upper area of propodeum without transverse carina; propodeum without transverse carina above foramen.

WINGS. Forewing ( Fig. 18G View Fig ) with M curved; cu-a 0.50 times as long as R; A extending half of Cu+M; R1 0.83 times as long as R; Rs 3.2 times as long as R.

LEGS. Tibiae carinate; flange on forefemur 0.49 times longer, 0.85 times wider than tubular part of forefemur; flange on foretibia 0.35 times longer, 0.50 times wider than tubular part of foretibia; flange on midfemur 0.53 times longer, 0.85 times wider than tubular part of midfemur; flange on midtibia 0.59 times longer, 0.29 times wider than tubular part of midtibia; hindcoxa dorso-laterally carinate; basal part of hindfemur producing; hindfemur basally stout, apparently wider than distal part; ventral margin of hindfemur flat; flange on hindfemur 0.61 times longer, 0.80 times wider than tubular part of hindfemur; outer surface of hindtibia smooth; flange on hindtibia 0.68 times longer, 1.2 times wider than tubular part of hindtibia.

PILOSITY. Lower gena with sparse decumbent cuneate setae ( Fig. 18D View Fig ); scape with sparse decumbent and suberect simple setae; forecoxa with sparse decumbent cuneate setae; foretibia with sparse decumbent and suberect simple and cuneate setae; midcoxa with sparse decumbent cuneate setae; midfemur and midtibia with sparse decumbent and suberect simple and cuneate setae; hindcoxa with sparse decumbent cuneate setae; hindfemur and hindtibia with sparse decumbent and suberect simple and cuneate setae.

COLORATION. Body reddish brown; antenna reddish brown; legs yellowish brown; ribbon-like setae whitish yellow.

Female

Unknown.

Distribution

Vietnam (Northern Vietnam) ( Fig. 28 View Fig ).

Remarks

Loboscelidia parallela sp. nov. resembles L. cuneata sp. nov. and L. halimunensis ; however, it can be distinguished by the following characteristics: femora with simple setae (with cuneate setae in L. cuneata sp. nov.); flange of forefemur 0.85 times as wide as the tubular part (0.25 times as wide as the tubular part in L. cuneata sp. nov.); flange of foretibia 0.50 times as wide as the tubular part (1.5 times as wide as the tubular part in L. cuneata sp. nov.); and curved M vein (straight in L. halimunensis ).

VNMN

Vietnam National Museum of Nature

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Chrysididae

Genus

Loboscelidia

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF