Typhlotanais mixtus, : Hansen, 1913
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.178692 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7604A52C-F935-459C-91DD-F7C7AD9F2CC6 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BAA970-6A5F-F57B-FF06-FF148822FB93 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Typhlotanais mixtus |
status |
|
‘ mixtus View in CoL ’ group
Diagnosis: Body elongate (over seven times as long as wide). Carapace elongate (over 1.5 times as long as wide). Cheliped basis separated from pereonite-1 by a gap ventrally. Pereonite-1 shorter then the others, all pereonites wider than long or square; pereonite margins delicately rounded; pereonites 1–3 carpus and propodus with spiniform seta; pereopods 4–5 merus with large prickly tubercles (larger than half of carpus length), propodus distal seta as long as half of dactylus; unguis simple; dactylus and unguis combined almost as long as propodus. Both pleopod rami with proximal seta separated from the others gap. Both uropod rami two-articled.
Male: Unknown.
Species included: Typhlotanais mixtus Hansen, 1913 ; Typhlotanais mimosis n. sp.
Remarks: The ‘ mixtus ’ group is well defined by the large gap between the cheliped basis and pereonite- 1 ventrally, large prickly tubercles on the carpus of pereopods 4–6 and a long dactylus on pereopods 4–6 that, combined with the unguis, is longer than the propodus. These characters are also valid for the provisional ‘ spinicauda ’ group, although they have pair of large terminal spines on the pleotelson. Typhlotanais mimosis n. sp. has a distinctive projection on the coxa of pereopods 1 to 3 characteristic also of T. greenwichensis and T. messinensis . The last two species constitute a separate ‘ greenwichensis ’ group defined by a number of other characters such as a lack of a gap between the cheliped basis and pereonite-1 ventrally, a row of short seta on cheliped carpus, and prickly tubercles surrounded by a row of spines. Since T. mimosis has the specific coxal projection on pereopods 1–3 the assignment of the species to the ‘ mixtus ’ group may be ambiguous, but because the new species shares more characters with T. mixtus than with any other ‘typhlotanaid’ it is placed in the ‘ mixtus ’ group at the moment.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.