Vendaphaea lajuma, Haddad, 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5733/afin.050.0204 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7911387 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BA87C3-FF90-F440-FE2A-FE94FE511E98 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Vendaphaea lajuma |
status |
sp. nov. |
Vendaphaea lajuma View in CoL sp. n.
Figs 1–27 View Figs 1, 2 View Figs 3–14 View Figs 15–17 View Figs 18–21 View Figs 22–27
Etymology: The species name is a noun in apposition taken from the type locality.
Description:
Male.
Measurements: CL 3.40–3.45, CW 2.73–2.80, AL 3.18–3.50, AW 2.05–2.55, TL 6.03– 6.68, FL 0.37–0.39, SL 1.39–1.43, SW 1.30–1.36. Distances between eyes:AME–AME 0.11, AME–ALE 0.07, ALE–ALE 0.56, PME–PME 0.06, PME–PLE 0.19, PLE–PLE 0.79. MOQAW 0.43, MOQPW 0.41, MOQL 0.51, PERW 1.02.
Length of leg segments (sequence from femur to tarsus, and total): I 2.48+1.25+2.35+ 2.05+0.60=8.73; II 2.25+1.17+1.85+1.85+0.58=7.70; III 1.73+0.98+1.25+1.35+0.55= 5.86; IV 2.40+1.05+1.93+2.20+0.71=8.29.
General appearance as in Fig. 1 View Figs 1, 2 . Carapace somewhat flattened, elevating slightly from eye region, highest at 3/4 carapace length; eye region distinctly narrowed and bulging; surface covered in short straight white setae medially and short black setae laterally; fovea long, distinct, at 2/3 carapace length; carapace uniform deep red, with slightly darker striae radiating from fovea ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1, 2 ). All eyes with brown rings, lateral eyes on slightly raised tubercles;AER procurved, laterals slightly larger than medians;AME separated by distance slightly larger than their diameter;AME separated from ALE by 2/3AME diameter; clypeus height equal to 1.5×AME diameter; PER slightly procurved, nearly straight, medians slightly larger than laterals; PME separated by distance equal to 2/3 their diameter; PME separated from PLE by distance approximately equal to 1.5× PME diameter; CW:PERW = 2.75:1. Chelicerae orange-red, with scattered long black setae on anterior surface; three teeth on promargin, proximal tooth smallest, median tooth largest; median and distal teeth closer to each other than to proximal tooth; retromargin with two widely separated teeth, distal tooth close to fang base, slightly smaller than proximal tooth; endites rounded on anterior prolateral margin, straight laterally and truncated posteriorly; labium 1.5 times broader than long; sternum shield-shaped, narrowed anteriorly, as broad as long, dark orange-red, brown along lateral margins. Legs stoutly built, particularly anterior pairs; all legs densely covered in short straight grey setae, particularly dorsum of patellae, tibiae and metatarsi; anterior tibiae and metatarsi strongly spined ventrally; coxae brown; femora I uniform dark red-orange, slightly darker distally; femora II dark orange-red, with grey distal band; femora III and IV yellow-orange, with narrow proximal and broad distal bands; patellae orange, with grey bands medially; tibiae I and II dark orange dorsally, grey ventrally; tibiae III and IV orange with grey markings dorsally and ventrally; metatarsi I–III orange dorsally with grey distal band; metatarsi IV yellow-orange dorsally with median and distal grey bands, grey ventrally; all tarsi dark brown; leg spination: femora: I plv 2 rlv 2; patellae: spineless; tibiae: I plv 8– 9 rlv 7–8, II plv 7–8 rlv 6, IV rl 1 plv 1 vt 1; metatarsi: I plv 5 rlv 5, II plv 5 rlv 5, III pl 2 plv 1 rlv 1 vt 2, IV plv 2 vt 3. Abdomen oval, dorsal scutum absent; dorsum grey-brown, densely covered with short straight black and grey setae; five short paired black chevron markings slightly lateral of midline in posterior half of abdomen, each ending in small cream spot; single median cream spot above spinnerets; venter unsclerotised, pale grey with darker grey mottling, densely covered in short straight grey setae. Male palp bright orange, without spines; cymbium broad, with dense setal mat medially and modified clavate setae along prolateral and distal margins ( Figs 18, 19 View Figs 18–21 , 22, 25 View Figs 22–27 ); palpal tibiae with rounded ventral-retrolateral bump, curved dorsal-retrolateral apophysis (proximal position, at approximately 60° to dorsal position), directed dorsally, and dorsal lobe ( Figs 22, 25 View Figs 22–27 ); tip of apophysis with three distinctive denticles ( Figs 18 View Figs 18–21 , 23, 25 View Figs 22–27 ); tegulum broad, pale orange, with thick embolus originating prolaterally, curving anticlockwise towards distal margin, with translucent conductor situated retrolaterally of embolus ( Fig. 23 View Figs 22–27 ); median apophysis spike-like, situated medially on tegulum within membranous section with a proximallydirected lobe ( Figs 20 View Figs 18–21 , 22–24 View Figs 22–27 ).
Female.
Measurements: CL 3.35–3.73, CW 2.60–2.83, AL 4.05–4.80, AW 3.10–3.90, TL 6.85– 7.85, FL 0.35–0.45, SL 1.38–1.50, SW 1.30–1.45. Distances between eyes:AME–AME 0.11, AME–ALE 0.06, ALE–ALE 0.59, PME–PME 0.10, PME–PLE 0.19, PLE–PLE 0.84. MOQAW 0.48, MOQPW 0.44, MOQL 0.59, PERW 1.08.
Length of leg segments (sequence from femur to tarsus, and total): I 2.63+1.39+2.44+ 2.15+0.60=9.21; II 2.35+1.25+1.90+1.88+0.57=6.95; III 1.82+1.08+1.30+1.44+0.55= 6.19; IV 2.45+1.30+2.20+2.40+0.70=9.05.
General appearance, morphology, colouration and markings as for male ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1, 2 ); anterior eye row procurved, laterals very slightly larger than medians;AME separated by distance slightly larger than their diameter; AME separated from ALE by 3/4 AME diameter; clypeus height slightly larger than AME diameter; PER slightly procurved, nearly straight, medians slightly larger than laterals; PME separated by distance equal to 2/3 their diameter; PME separated from PLE by distance approximately equal to 1.5× PME diameter; CW:PERW = 2.62:1. Chelicerae with three teeth on promargin, proximal tooth smallest, median tooth largest; median and distal teeth closer to each other than to proximal tooth; retromargin with two subequal teeth, distal tooth close to fang base. Leg spination: femora: I plv 2 rlv 2; patellae: spineless; tibiae: I plv 9 rlv 8–9, II plv 7–8 rlv 6–7; metatarsi: I plv 5 rlv 5, II plv 4–5 rlv 5, III pl 2 plv 1 rlv 1 vt 2, IV plv 3 rlv 1 vt 2. Epigyne with broad posterior lobe, with diamond-shaped median septum; copulatory openings situated laterally of septum ( Fig. 26 View Figs 22–27 ); spermathecae curved, projecting into body ( Fig. 27 View Figs 22–27 ), distinctly visible through integument ( Fig. 26 View Figs 22–27 ).
Holotype: ơ SOUTH AFRICA: Limpopo: Soutpansberg Mountains , Lajuma Mountain Retreat, Woodland , 23°02.528'S: 29°26.866'E, 3.xi.2004, M. Mafadza, sifting leaf litter (NCA 2008/562). GoogleMaps
Paratypes: all from the same locality as holotype: Island 2, 23°01.921'S: 29°26.193'E, 23.xi.2004, M. Mafadza, active searching, 2ơ (NCA 2005/2016), 1ơ 2^(NCA 2008/563); Island 3, 23°01.890'S: 29°26.167'E, 23.xi.2004, M. Mafadza, active searching,1ơ 1^(NCA 2005/2015);Grassland patch, 23°02.414'S: 29°26.687'E, 6.ii.2008, C. Haddad, base of grass tussocks, 1ơ 7^(NCA 2008/514); same locality, 3–11.ii.2008, C. Haddad, base of grass tussocks, 2^(MPEG 15441) GoogleMaps .
Distribution:Apparently endemic to the western Soutpansberg Mountains in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. It was not collected during published surveys of the Kruger National Park ( Dippenaar-Schoeman & Leroy 2003), Makalali Game Reserve ( Whitmore et al. 2001), Nylsvley Nature Reserve ( Dippenaar-Schoeman et al. 2009), Polokwane Nature Reserve ( Dippenaar et al. 2008), or the Sovenga Hill inselberg near Polokwane ( Modiba et al. 2005); all of these conserved areas fall within the Limpopo Province. It was also not collected at any of ten sites sampled as part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida in the Limpopo Province (S. Foord & A.S. Dippenaar-Schoeman, pers. comm): Bewaarkloof, Blouberg, Entabeni, Lekgalameetse, Leopard Creek Private Conservation Reserve, Marakele, Mogalakwena, Pafuri, Tshulu, and Wonderkop. This strongly suggests that V. lajuma sp. n. is a Soutpansberg endemic.
Habitat preferences: V. lajuma sp. n. was initially collected by Foord et al. (2008) from leaf litter of mixed woodland habitats in the Soutpansberg, where subsequent samples were also collected from montane savannah. The material collected by the author (NCA 2008/514), including 20 additional specimens that were sent to various colleagues for morphological and genetic studies, were all collected from the bases of grass tussocks in montane savannah.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |