Conchocele kiritachiensis, Hryniewicz & Amano & Jenkins & Kiel, 2017

Hryniewicz, Krzysztof, Amano, Kazutaka, Jenkins, Robert G. & Kiel, Steffen, 2017, Thyasirid bivalves from Cretaceous and Paleogene cold seeps, Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 62 (4), pp. 705-728 : 714

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.00390.2017

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BA831C-DF29-CE39-FFA3-50A9FC06F9CB

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Conchocele kiritachiensis
status

sp. nov.

Conchocele kiritachiensis sp. nov.

Figs. 8 View Fig , 9 View Fig .

Etymology: Named for the type locality (Kiritachi).

Type material: Holotype: JUE 16036 ; an articulated and undeformed specimen with most of the shell preserved. Other figured specimens designated as paratypes ( JUE 16037-1 to 16037-7 ), all from the type locality.

Type locality:A hydrocarbon seep deposit at Kiritachi , Tomamae Town, Hokkaido, Japan .

Type horizon: Sakasagawa Formation , upper Eocene .

Material.— Type material and 10 unnumbered specimens from the type locality, all stored in JUE paleontological collections .

Dimensions.— The holotype is 45.5 mm long and 41.1 mm high.

Diagnosis. — Medium-size species of Conchocele with umbones displaced strongly towards anterior, straight anterior shell margin, pointed beaks and obtuse anteroventral angle. Posterior sinus deep and obtuse. Posterior fold broad but short.

Description. — Shell medium-sized, up to 62.1 mm long, equivalve, moderately inflated, rhomboidal in outline. External ornament composed of densely spaced, low commarginal growth lines. Umbones terminal, umbonal angle around 95°, beaks prosogyrous, not incurved, anteroventral angle around 120°. Lunule absent, but anterior area demarcated with crude ridge running from umbo toward anteroventral angle. Ventral margin nearly straight close to anteroventral angle, well rounded in median and posterior part, with deepest curvature located posterior to mid-line. Posterior angle around 95°, posterior sinus deep, forming an obtuse angle. Posterior sulcus dorsally convex, sharp. Posterior dorsal margin rounded. Anterior adductor muscle scar well-impressed, striated, elongate ovate. Posterior adductor muscle scar rather small, weakly impressed, visible in both side of posterior sulcus. Ligament sunken but hinge structure unknown.

Remarks. — This species belongs to a group of Conchocele species with rhomboidal shells with pointed beaks and straight anterior shell margin. A similar and coeval species from Eastern Pacific is Conchocele bathyaulax Hickman, 2015 from non-seep deposits of the upper Eocene–lower Oligocene Keasey Formation, Oregon, which has narrower and longer posterior fold than C. kiritachiensis . Conchocele cf. bathyaulax from upper Eocene–Oligocene seeps in Washington State is also similar to C. kiritachiensis , but differs by having a more inflated and shorter shell and an overall larger size.

ventral margin

There are several similar species known in the Cenozoic of the Northwestern Pacific. Yabe and Nomura (1925: pl. 23: 8, 10a) figured “ Thyasira ” bisecta from the Neogene of Sakhalin. Similar specimens from the upper Pliocene of south-western Sakhalin were later figured and designated by Kristofovich (1936: 29, pl. 1: 3, 4) as “ Thyasira ” bisecta var. alta . In the following work, Kristofovich (1964: 213, pl. 53: 5) mentions “ Thyasira ” disjuncta var. alta to occur in the upper Miocene of Sakhalin, Kamchatka and Pliocene of Sado Island. The age of the Sakhalin occurrence was later found by Khudik (1989) to be Miocene–Pliocene. This species is more elongated, has a smaller apical angle, and narrower posterior fold than C. kiritachiensis , but is otherwise similar and belongs to the same species group. Some specimens described by Kristofovich (1936) as new species “ Thyasira ” pervulgata ( Kristofovich 1936: 45, pl. 6: 4, 6) from the Eocene? and “ Thyasira ” wajampolkana ( Kristofovich 1936: 44, pl. 6: 3, 3a) from the Miocene of western Kamchatka could also belong to the same species group as Conchocele kiritachiensis . However, both species are not sufficiently well described and figured to allow a more detailed comparison.

Stratigraphic and geographic range. — Type locality and horizon only.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Mollusca

Class

Bivalvia

Order

Lucinida

Family

Thyasiridae

Genus

Conchocele

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF