Raveniola arthuri ( Kunt & Yağmur, 2010 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2018.399 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E836E138-D6E2-4F62-B4B3-CE2E073F2B24 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5980296 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B9B44C-566E-0C3D-5122-8486FD214CE0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Raveniola arthuri ( Kunt & Yağmur, 2010 ) |
status |
|
Raveniola arthuri ( Kunt & Yağmur, 2010) View in CoL
Figs 76 View Figs 74–78 , 109 View Figs 102–116 , 137 View Figs 137–140 , 157 View Figs 157–160 , 184 View Figs 180–188 , 221 View Figure221
Raveniola arthuri Kunt & Yağmur, 2010: 306 View in CoL , figs 1a–e, 2a–d (♂).
Diagnosis
In the structure of its embolus this species is similar to Raveniola micropa , but differs from the latter by a considerably shorter and narrower proximal part of the embolus ( Fig. 184 View Figs 180–188 ; cf. Fig. 187–188 View Figs 180–188 ).
Material examined
Holotype TURKEY: ♂, Diyarkabır Province, Eğil District, 38°15′28.27″ N, 40°5′2.44″ E, 857 m, 13 Apr. 2008, under stones, E.A. Yağmur, E. Tezcan and V. Ülgezer leg. ( AUZM) GoogleMaps .
Paratypes TURKEY: 2 ♂♂, collection data as for holotype ( AUZM) GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. TBL 14.85, CL 4.92, CW 4.16, LL 0.38, LW 0.78, SL 2.31, SW 2.11.
COLOUR. Prosoma dorsally brownish orange, with darkened palp, leg I, cephalic area and radial grooves on carapace; eye tubercle dark brown; chelicerae medium cherry-red; sternum, labium, maxillae, palps and legs ventrally light reddish brown; abdomen dorsally light brownish grey with diffuse darker light brown dorsal pattern (several irregular transverse fasciae), ventral abdominal surface and spinnerets pale yellowish brown.
PROSOMA. Carapace and chelicerae as shown in Fig. 76 View Figs 74–78 . Clypeus and eye group as in Fig. 109 View Figs 102–116 . Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.12(0.16), ALE 0.18, PLE 0.12, PME 0.12, AME–AME 0.15(0.11), ALE–AME 0.07(0.05), ALE–PLE 0.09, PLE–PME 0.03, PME–PME 0.34. Each cheliceral furrow with 11 promarginal teeth and 7–8 mesobasal denticles. Maxillae with 10–11 cuspules each.
LEGS. Tibia and metatarsus I as shown in Fig. 137 View Figs 137–140 . Scopula: distal on metatarsi I–II, entire on tarsi I– II; absent on tarsi III–IV. Trichobothria: 2 rows of 9–10 each on tibiae, 11–14 on metatarsi, 11–13 on tarsi, 8 on cymbium. Paired tarsal claws with 6–8 teeth on each margin.
LEG MEASUREMENTS.
Femur | Patella | Tibia | Metatarsus | Tarsus | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Palp | 2.41 | 1.30 | 1.88 | – | 0.83 | 6.42 |
Leg I | 4.03 | 2.30 | 3.01 | 3.10 | 1.68 | 16.13 |
Leg II | 3.55 | 1.67 | 2.27 | 2.82 | 1.52) | 14.33 |
Leg III | 3.19 | 2.03 | 2.78 | 2.78 | 1.67 | 12.62 |
Leg IV | 4.04 | 2.07 | 3.11 | 4.09 | 1.70 | 16.61 |
SPINATION. Femora I–IV with one basodorsal spine and 3–4 median and distal bristles; patellae I and II aspinose. Palp: femur d1–1–1–1, pd1; patella p1; tibia d1–1–0, p1–1–1, pv1–1–2, r0–0–1, rv1–1–0; cymbium d4. Leg I: femur pd0–0–1; tibia p0–1–0, rv1–1–1–m–m, metatarsus v0–0–2. Leg II: femur pd0–1–1; tibia p1–1–1, v2–1–1–3; metatarsus v2–2–2. Leg III: femur pd0–0–1, rd0–1–1; patella p1, r1; tibia d1–1–0, p1–1(2)–1, r1–1–1, v2(3)–2–3; metatarsus d0–0–1–0, p1–1–1–1–1, r1(0)–1–1, v1(2)–2–3. Leg IV: femur pd0–0–1, rd0–0–1; patella p1, r1; tibia d0–0–1–0, p1–1–1, r1(0)–1–1, v2–2–3; metatarsus d0–1–1–0, p1–1–1–1, r1–1–1–0, v2–2–3.
PALP. Tibia, cymbium and bulb as shown in Fig. 157 View Figs 157–160 . Embolic keel lost; embolus corkscrew-shaped, with basal bend located submedially ( Fig. 184 View Figs 180–188 ).
SPINNERETS. PMS: length 0.42; diameter 0.15. PLS: maximal diameter 0.43; length of basal, medial and apical segments 0.73, 0.58, 0.51; total length 1.82; apical segment shortly digitiform.
Female
Unknown.
Variation
Carapace length in males varies from 4.05 to 4.16. The shape of the embolus in the holotype and both paratypic males is practically identical.
Ecology
The type series, containing only males, was collected in an open steppe biotope without trees; the spiders were found hiding under stones.
Distribution
Known only from the type locality. See Fig. 221 View Figure221 .
AUZM |
AUZM |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Raveniola arthuri ( Kunt & Yağmur, 2010 )
Zonstein, Sergei, Kunt, Kadir B. & Yağmur, Ersen A. 2018 |
Raveniola arthuri Kunt & Yağmur, 2010: 306
Kunt & Yagmur 2010: 306 |