Raveniola nana, Zonstein & Kunt & Yağmur, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2018.399 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E836E138-D6E2-4F62-B4B3-CE2E073F2B24 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5980292 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C3C6CE26-9C99-4A76-9A63-46779FEFF1CA |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:C3C6CE26-9C99-4A76-9A63-46779FEFF1CA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Raveniola nana |
status |
sp. nov. |
Raveniola nana View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C3C6CE26-9C99-4A76-9A63-46779FEFF1CA
Figs 89 View Figs 84–89 , 122 View Figs 117–128 , 204 View Figs 204–212 , 221 View Figure221
Diagnosis
The structure of the spermathecae of Raveniola nana sp. nov. resembles that of R. turcica sp. nov. (the female of R. birecikensis sp. nov. is unknown), but differs in having the median and lateral receptacles situated considerably closer to each other ( Fig. 204 View Figs 204–212 ; cf. Fig. 205 View Figs 204–212 ). Additionally, R. nana sp. nov. is considerably smaller and has a paler coloration than both the latter species.
Etymology
The specific epithet (a variable adjective from Ancient Greek νᾶνος, meaning ‘dwarf’) refers to the very small size of this species.
Material examined
Holotype TURKEY: ♀, Hatay Province, Hassa District, Küreci Village , 36°42′36.89″ N, 36°27′14.44″ E, 499 m, 15 Nov. 2010, Anlaş and Yağmur leg. ( AUZM). GoogleMaps
Description
Female (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. TBL 10.97, CL 3.69, CW 2.82, LL 0.29, LW 0.65, SL 1.84, SW 1.62.
COLOUR. Most parts of body pale brownish; eye tubercle with partially fused dark brown rings surrounding AMEs and lateral eyes; chelicerae light red; abdomen uniformly light yellowish grey without dorsal pattern, spinnerets pale yellowish grey.
PROSOMA. Carapace and chelicerae as shown in Fig. 89 View Figs 84–89 . Clypeus and eye group as in Fig. 122 View Figs 117–128 . Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.09(0.12), ALE 0.13, PLE 0.10, PME 0.08, AME–AME 0.08(0.06), ALE–AME 0.05(0.04), ALE–PLE 0.05, PLE–PME 0.02, PME–PME 0.23. Each cheliceral furrow with 8 promarginal teeth and 7 mesobasal denticles. Maxillae each with 5–7 cuspules along heel.
LEGS. Scopula: distal on metatarsi I–II, entire on tarsus I and palpal tarsus, widely divided on tarsus II, elsewhere absent. Trichobothria: 2 rows of 8–9 each on tibiae, 9–10 on metatarsi, 10–11 on tarsi, 8 on palpal tarsus. Paired tarsal claws with 7–10 teeth on each margin. Palpal claw with 6 teeth on inner margin.
LEG MEASUREMENTS.
Femur | Patella | Tibia | Metatarsus | Tarsus | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Palp | 1.82 | 1.24 | 1.26 | – | 1.15 | 5.47 |
Leg I | 2.24 | 1.53 | 1.85 | 1.50 | 1.12 | 8.24 |
Leg II | 2.17 | 1.35 | 1.65 | 1.45 | 1.16 | 7.78 |
Leg III | 2.07 | 1.15 | 1.45 | 1.95 | 1.19 | 7.81 |
Leg IV | 2.58 | 1.37 | 2.35 | 2.83 | 1.36 | 10.49 |
SPINATION. Femora I–IV with one basodorsal spine and 3 dorsal bristles alongside midline; palpal femur dorsally with 3 bristles; palpal patella and patellae I–II aspinose. Palp: femur pd0–0–1; tibia v1–1–2; tarsus v2–0–0. Leg I: femur pd0–0–1; tibia v1–1–2; metatarsus v1–2–2. Leg II: femur pd0–0–1; tibia p0–0–1, v1–2–2; metatarsus v1(0)–1–2. Leg III: femur pd1–1–1, rd1–1–1; patella p1, r1; tibia d1–1(0)– 0, p1–1–1, r1–1–1, v2–2–3; metatarsus pd0–1–0, p1–1–1, r1–1–1, v2–2–3. Leg IV: femur pd0–0–1, rd0–0–1; patella r1; tibia d1–0–0, p1–1–1, r1(0)–1–1, v2–2–3; metatarsus d0–1–1–0, p1–1–1–1, r1–1– 1–1, v2–2–3.
SPERMATHECAE. Moderately broad with receptacles close to each other ( Fig. 204 View Figs 204–212 ).
SPINNERETS. PMS: length 0.36; diameter 0.16. PLS: maximal diameter 0.31; length of basal, medial and apical segments 0.55, 0.35, 0.34; total length 1.24; apical segment shortly digitiform.
Ecology
The holotypic female was found in open forest under a stone.
Distribution
South-Eastern Turkey ( Fig. 221 View Figure221 ).
Note
There is a possibility that the holotype of Raveniola nana sp. nov. is the unknown female of the allopatric R. biresekensis sp. nov. However, both these species differ in size and colouration ( R. nana sp. nov. is noticeably smaller and considerably paler than the latter species), as well as in the relative size of AMEs and PMEs (larger vs smaller, respectively). We thus prefer to consider these names as belonging to different species, until the currently missing males of R. nana sp. nov. and the unknown females of R. biresekensis sp. nov. are collected and identified.
AUZM |
AUZM |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |