Trichrysis seducta ( Smith, 1860 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2023.2250158 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10469370 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B9879F-FF9C-2848-FE26-FA4AFEFEC7C8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Trichrysis seducta ( Smith, 1860 ) |
status |
|
Trichrysis seducta ( Smith, 1860)
( Figure 19A–19F View Figure 19 )
Chrysis seducta Smith, 1860, p. 67 . Syntypes ♀, Indonesia: Makassar ( OUMUK).
Trichrysis seducta : Bohart in Kimsey and Bohart [1990] 1991, p. 573 (lectotype design., Celebes, Makassar ).
Material examined
1♀: [ Indonesia (Sulawesi)] Mak. [= Makassar ]/ Chrysis seducta Smith , HOLOTYPE ( OUMUK); 1♀: Chrysis seducta Smith [ OUMUK].
Remarks
Smith (1860) described Chrysis seducta based on an unknown number of specimens. Bohart in Kimsey and Bohart ([1990] 1991) designated the lectotype without pinning any identification label with the selected specimen. As already noticed by Rosa (2009), Rosa et al. (2017 b, 2020), and WiŚniowski in Rosa et al. (2022a), Bohart often designated lectotypes in European museums without pinning any identification label on the selected type, thus making the identification of the lectotype impossible and, therefore, invalid. In the OUMUK type collection two specimens belonging to two different species of Trichrysis bear the same light blue identification label of Chrysis seducta handwritten by Smith, but only one bears the locality label ′Mak̍. and a recently added round red type label. I consider this specimen to be the lectotype designated by Bohart ( Figure 19 View Figure 19 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Trichrysis seducta ( Smith, 1860 )
Rosa, Paolo 2023 |
Chrysis seducta
Smith F 1860: 67 |