Cyana amabilis ( Moore, 1877 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4738.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B29D53CB-4E0D-4A25-97EC-ED983730E8B2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3680089 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B8587A-3D04-FB0C-5FC7-FC16FC2CFD7F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cyana amabilis ( Moore, 1877 ) |
status |
|
Cyana amabilis ( Moore, 1877) View in CoL
( Figs 63–65 View FIGURES 52–67 , 190 View FIGURES 188–190 , 257 View FIGURES 252–257 )
Bizone amabilis Moore, 1877 , Proceedings of the general meetings for scientific business of the Zoological Society of London 1877: 597, pl. 59, fig. 2 (Type locality: “S. Andamans (Port Blair)”).
Type material examined. Lectotype (designated herein) ( Fig. 63 View FIGURES 52–67 ): ♂, handwritten label “Andaman Isles ♂ (upper side) Deiopeia amabilis ♂ type) Moore (under side)” / printed label “Moore Coll. 94–106” / printed round label with a red circle “Type” / printed label with a unique identifier “NHMUK010597942” (Coll. NHMUK).
Other material examined. THE ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ISLANDS: 35 ♂, India, Andaman Islands, North Andaman—Mayabunder , 6 km S: Karmatany—Rainforest , 12°50’61”N, 092°56’06”E, 17–21.XI.2000, leg. J.P. Rudloff (Coll. MWM / ZSM) ; 3 ♂, India, M. Andaman , Rangat— 2.5 km S, 12,2761°N, 92,5623°E, 12– 13.VIII.2001, leg. Jan-Peter Rudloff, coll. Dr. R. Brechlin (Coll. MWM / ZSM) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂, 4 ♀, India, M. Andaman, Karmatang , 1.5 km E, 12,5072°N, 92,5610°E, 17–22.VIII.2001, leg. Jan-Peter Rudloff, coll. Dr. R. Brechlin, slide MWM 35684 (♀) Volynkin (Coll. MWM / ZSM) GoogleMaps ; 37 ♂, India, M. Andaman , Tugapure— 3 km S, 12,4889°N, 92,4929°E, 14–16.VIII.2001, leg. Jan-Peter Rudloff, coll. Dr. R. Brechlin (Coll. MWM / ZSM) GoogleMaps ; 46 ♂, India, Anda- man Islands, Middle Andaman , Tugapure ( Rainfor. ), 12°50’72”N, 092°49’29”E, 22–26.XI.2000, leg. J.P. Rudloff, slide MWM 35683 (♂) Volynkin (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 2 ♂, India, Andaman Islands, South Andaman—Bambooflat (Rainfor.), 11°42’82”N, 092°42’02”E, 27–28.XI.2000, leg. J.P. Rudloff (Coll. MWM / ZSM) ; 3 ♂, India, South Andaman, Havelock , 10.I.2018, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI) ; 2 ♂, India, South Andaman, Havelock , 11.I.2018, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI) ; 3 ♂, South Andaman, Wandur , 31.XII.2017, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI) ; 7 ♂, India, South Andaman, Chidiya Tapu , 29.XII.2017, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI) ; 3 ♂, Great Nicobar, Campbell bay , 27.XI.2016, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI) ; 2 ♂, Great Nicobar, Gobind Nagar , 25.XI.2016, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI) ; 2 ♂, North Andaman, Mayabander , 1.I.2018, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI) .
Remark. In the original description, Moore (1877) mentioned two collections where the material is deposited therefore the existence of syntypes is obvious. In order to stabilize the nomenclature, we designate the male specimen deposited in NHMUK and labeled as ‘type’ as lectotype.
Diagnosis. Forewing length is 9–10 mm in males and 11 mm in females. Cyana amabilis is a closest relative of C. quadrinotata . Nevertheless, it mostly resembles externally C. pudens ( Walker, 1862) ( Figs 66, 67 View FIGURES 52–67 , 173 View FIGURES 173–175 , 246 View FIGURES 246–251 ), but differs from it by the more elongate forewing, broader antemedial line, broader and almost straight postmedial line (in C. pudens that is strongly curved at costa and anal forewing margin), and the not dentate inner margin of the subterminal line. In addition, in males of C. amabilis the inner discal spot is larger, the outer discal spots are connected (those are well-separated in C. pudens ), the subbasal line is broader and less curved, and the antemedial line is S-like curved (whereas in C. pudens that is almost straight and only slightly curved at the wing costa). The male genital capsule of C. amabilis differs from that of C. quadrinotata by its larger lateral lobes of vinculum and slightly longer distal section of valva. The aedeagus of C. amabilis is broader than that of C. quadrinotata . The vesica of C. amabilis differs from that of C. quadrinotata by its dorsally broader dorsal diverticulum having short and narrow membranous subdiverticulum, broader ventral subbasal diverticulum, and its larger distal cluster of spinules. The female genitalia of the two species are very similar, but in C. amabilis the laterally prominent sclerotized posterior section of corpus bursae is more rounded, whereas in C. quadrinotata that is more trigonal.
Distribution. India: the Andaman and Nicobar Islands ( Arora 1983).
NHMUK |
Natural History Museum, London |
ZSM |
Bavarian State Collection of Zoology |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cyana amabilis ( Moore, 1877 )
Singh, Navneet, Volynkin, Anton V., Kirti, Jagbir Singh, Datta, Harvinder Singh & Ivanova, Maria S. 2020 |
Bizone amabilis
Moore 1877 |