Teramnonotus, Santana, William, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3905.1.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F66C212C-1B72-44E1-B2F8-66215DBC6928 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6108621 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7FA8EB71-E662-4996-8D34-04156F9D58BC |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:7FA8EB71-E662-4996-8D34-04156F9D58BC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Teramnonotus |
status |
gen. nov. |
Teramnonotus View in CoL n. gen.
Elamena View in CoL (pro parte)— Monod 1956: 469; Lucas 1980: 170 –171; Ng & Chuang 1996: 6; Ng et al. 2008: 108; Guinot et al. 2013: 191 [not Elamena H. Milne Edwards, 1837 View in CoL . Type species Hymenosoma mathoei Desmarest, 1823 View in CoL ].
Type species. Elamena gordonae Monod, 1956 , by original designation. Gender masculine.
Included species. Teramnonotus gordonae ( Monod, 1956) n. gen., n. comb., eastern Atlantic (between Conakry, Guinea and Monrovia, Liberia), T. johnlucasi n. gen., n. sp., western Pacific ( Australia: Queensland), and T. monodi n. gen., n. sp., southwestern Atlantic ( Brazil: Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Sergipe, Bahia and Rio de Janeiro).
Comparative material. Elamena longidactylis Yang & Sun, 1998: 1 male cl 2.8 mm, cw 2.3 mm, 1 juvenile female cl 2.5 mm, cw 2.2 mm, Xiamen, Gu-Lang-Yu, Fujian Province, China, mud flat, under stones, 13.xii.1984 ( ZRC 2004.0736). Hymenosoma mathoei Desmarest, 1823 : Gesira, Somalia, coll. x.1981, reef, two females, one juvenile female ( ZRC 1994.4235). Gesira, Somalia, coll. x.1981, reef, young male ( ZRC 1994.4234). Trigonoplax spathulifera Lucas, 1980 : Western Australia, Woodside Dampier Expedition 2, Dampier Archipelago, Brigadier Island, 4.8 km E of East Point, stn DA2/99/85, between 20º26.38'S, 116º39.76'E and 20º26.09'S, 116º40.10'E, S. Slack-Smith & M. Hewitt coll., 26.vii.1999, 29 m, 1 ovigerous female ( WAM C27116); Woodside Dampier Expedition 3, Dampier Archipelago, Nelson Rocks, stn DA3/99/68, 20º27.99'S, 116º39.71'E, M. Hewitt coll., 7.ix.1999, 6 m, 1 juvenile female ( WAM C27685). Woodside Dampier Expedition 1, Dampier Archipelago, Angel Island, stn DA 1/98/09, 20º28.69'S, 116º47.95'E, M. Hewitt coll., 20.x.1998, 1 juvenile female ( WAM C25639), 1 male ( WAM C25640); Searipple Passage, Burrup Peninsula, 20º31'S, 116º51'E, D. S. Jones & B. Morton coll., 7.x.1999, 1 juvenile female ( WAM C33088). Trigonoplax unguiformis H. Milne Edwards, 1853 : Indonesia, Moluccas, Ambon, Hitu, Ambon Bay, outer bay, in front of Ruhmatiga, up to river Lela; Rumphius Biohistorial Expedition, stn 41, L.B. Holthuis coll., 10.xii.1990, dredge, 4–28 m, female ( RMNH).
Diagnosis. Carapace pear-shaped, moderately convex, dorsal carapace surface with faint longitudinal ridge, edges slightly upturned; rostrum triangular, upturned, continuous with carapace surface; ventral rostral keel absent. Epistome long, almost as long as broad; pterygostomial region with 2 prominent blunt teeth. No orbits, eyes-stalk immovable, short, stout, fused with carapace; most of eyes hidden beneath rostrum in dorsal view, only cornea visible dorsally; small post-ocular tooth present; cornea pigmented. Antennules fold beneath rostrum; interantenullar septum short, reaching to less than half-length of second antennular article. Antenna conspicuously slender, short, concealed by rostrum in dorsal view. Third maxillipeds broad, almost completely filling mouth square, ischium subequal to merus along lateral edge; merus heart-shaped; epipod lamella about same size as basal portion (operculum); palp articulating near merus anterolateral angle; exopod with distinct flagellum. Chelipeds slender, subequal, stouter than pereiopods; dactyli usually with 2 subterminal teeth. Thoracic sternite 4 extended laterally, conspicuously convex anteriorly distinctly separating Milne Edwards openings from chelipeds. Thoracic sternite 8 fully covered by carapace in dorsal and posterior views. Female abdomen very large, broader than cephalothorax width, soft; somites 1, 2 free, somites 3–5, fused; somite 6 separated from previous somites, fused with telson; Pl2–Pl5 articulated close to lateral edge of somites enlarging brood cavity. Vulvae located on medially fused part of thoracic sternites, oblique, slit-like, peripheral border swollen.
Remarks. Elamena H. Milne Edwards, 1837 (type species Hymenosoma mathoei Desmarest, 1823 ) is the second largest hymenosomatid genus in terms of species, 25 species (Ng et al. 2008). Elamena has been reviewed and partially revised in a number of occasions (e.g., Alcock 1900, Kemp 1917, Tesch 1918, Gordon 1940, Melrose 1975, Lucas 1980, Ng & Chuang 1996), yet its species composition is still in need of a reappraisal. Guinot (2011b), for instance, commented on the puzzling position of Elamena truncata (Stimpson, 1858) in Elamena , and Ng & Chuang (1996) stated that E. magna Ng & Chuang, 1996 , might actually belong in a new genus. Elamena longirostris Filhol, 1885 , also leaves doubt as to its generic position; Filhol (1885) stated that E. longirostris belong in the same genus as Elamena whitei Miers, 1876 , a species subsequently reallocated in the genus Halicarcinus White, 1846 (Ng et al. 2008) . A comparison between Elamena gordonae Monod, 1956 s . str. and representatives of Elamena (including its type species) revealed that E. gordonae can no longer be attributed to Elamena , nor to the closely related genus Trigonoplax H. Milne Edwards, 1853 . Elamena gordonae Monod, 1956 s . str. is therefore herein transferred to Teramnonotus n. gen. as its type species along with the two new species being described, one from the southwestern Atlantic and a second from eastern Australia.
The genus Teramnonotus n. gen. can be distinguished from Elamena H. Milne Edwards, 1837 s . str. in having: (i) an immovable ocular peduncle, completely fused to the carapace ( Figs. 1B, D View FIGURE 1. A – D , 5B, C View FIGURE 5. A – D ) (freely movable in Elamena , Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5. A – D ); (ii) rostral keel absent ( Figs. 5A–C View FIGURE 5. A – D , 6A, B View FIGURE 6. A – C ) (a distinct, vertical keel on the ventral surface of the rostrum in Elamena ; Figs. 5D View FIGURE 5. A – D , 6C View FIGURE 6. A – C ); (iii) subhepatic region with two strong lobes ( Figs. 1B, D View FIGURE 1. A – D , 4A–C View FIGURE 4. A – D , 5B, C View FIGURE 5. A – D ) (smooth in Elamena ; Figs. 2B View FIGURE 2. A – D , 5D View FIGURE 5. A – D ); (iv) thoracic sternite 8 concealed by the carapace in dorsal and posterior views ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6. A – C D) (thoracic sterni.te 8 partially visible in dorsal and posterior views between the carapace, the abdominal somites 1 and 2, and the P5 coxa in Elamena ; Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6. A – C F); (v) narrow thoracic sternite 8 so that the P5 coxae are close to each other ( Fig. 1A, B View FIGURE 1. A – D ) (wide thoracic sternite, so that the coxae of P5 are far from each other in Elamena ; Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2. A – D ); (vi) first female abdominal somite distinctly narrower than the second ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6. A – C D) (somites 1 and 2 of about the same size in Elamena ); (vii) female abdominal somites 1 and 2 free, somites 3 to 5 fused, lateral clefts still discernible even if minute, and a pleotelson ( Fig. 7 A View FIGURE 7. A, C –D) (somites 1–5 free and a pleotelson in Elamena ).
Trigonoplax H. Milne Edwards, 1853 View in CoL [type species Ocypode (Trigonoplax) unguiformis De Haan, 1839 , by monotypy] share a number of characters with Elamena View in CoL and, in the past, was even considered a subgenus of Elamena View in CoL by many authors (e.g., Alcock 1900; Kemp 1917; Gordon 1940). Trigonoplax View in CoL can be distinguished from both Elamena View in CoL and Teramnonotus View in CoL n. gen. by (i) the inhalant water openings being fused laterally for more than half of its length (see Lucas, 1980: 154) (not fused in Elamena View in CoL and Teramnonotus View in CoL n. gen.; Fig. 5 B, C View FIGURE 5. A – D ), and (ii) a large portion of the female thoracic sternite 8 is not dorsolaterally covered by the carapace ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6. A – C E) (thoracic sternite 8 fully covered by the carapace in Teramnonotus View in CoL n. gen. and a small portion of thoracic sternite 8 dorsally exposed in Elamena View in CoL in dorsal and posterior views respectively; Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6. A – C D, F). Trigonoplax View in CoL also differs from Teramnonotus View in CoL n. gen. in the presence of well-developed keel on the ventral surface of the rostrum (rostral keel absent in Teramnonotus View in CoL n. gen.; Figs. 5A–C View FIGURE 5. A – D , 6A, B View FIGURE 6. A – C ).
Etymology. The generic name Teramnonotus is a combination of the Greek words teramnos (soft) and notus (back), in allusion to the soft and smooth dorsal surface of the carapace. Gender masculine.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Teramnonotus
Santana, William 2015 |
Elamena
Guinot 2013: 191 |
Ng 1996: 6 |
Lucas 1980: 170 |
Monod 1956: 469 |