Chrysometa cambara Levi, 1986
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1678-4766e2018001 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10630373 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B787CA-FFCA-4504-FC50-FE40FA8FF8CF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Chrysometa cambara Levi, 1986 |
status |
|
Chrysometa cambara Levi, 1986 View in CoL
( Figs 15-27 View Figs 15-21 View Figs 22-27 , 38 View Figs 38, 39. 38 )
Chrysometa cambara LEVI, 1986:192 View in CoL , figs 618-623. Female holotype from Itaimbezinho, Cambará do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 5.I.1985, A. Lise leg., deposited in MCN 12795 (examined). Paratypes: female, same data of holotype ( MCN 12800; examined); female, Teresópolis (1800 m), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 15.III.1946, H. Sick leg. and female, (open stone cave) same data above ( AMNH, both not examined); male paratype, Porto Alegre, 15.VIII.1976, P.A. Buckup leg. ( MCN 4546, examined; see note below). Only the female holotype and female paratypes; not the male paratype (misidentification, male same as C. itaimba Levi, 1986 View in CoL ).
Note. LEVI (1986:192) stated that the males and females described as C. cambara View in CoL does not necessarily belong together.MCN records indicated an additional female “ paratype ” (ex-MCN 12784; same data of holotype) which should be deposited at MCZ; however this specimen is not indicated at the original description.
Other material examined. BRAZIL, Paraná: Irati *, ♂, 20.II.2012 ( MCN 52197 ) ; ♂, 5.III.2012 ( MCN 52195 ) ; Tijucas do Sul ( Serra do Cabral *) , ♂, 30.I.2012 ( MCN 52196 ) ; ♀, 2.IV.2012 ( MCN 52190 ) ; ♀, 5.I.2012 ( MCN 52191 ) ; ♀, 30.I.2012 ( MCN 52192 ) ; ♀, 5.II.2012 ( MCN 52193 ) ; ♀, 30.I.2012 ( MCN 52194 ) ; 2♂, 30.I.2012 ( MCN 52230 ) , all J. Ricetti leg. Rio Grande do Sul: Cambará do Sul, 2♀, 25.XI.1993, L.A.Moura leg. ( MCN 24259 ) ; ♀, 19-21.XII.1994, E. H. Buckup leg. ( MCN 25988 ) ; 3♀, 19-21.XII.1994, E. H. Buckup leg. ( MCN 26050 ) ; São Francisco de Paula , ♀, X.2001, R. Baldissera leg. ( MCN 35223 ) ; ♂, 29.I.2006, L. A. Moura leg. ( MCN 40356 ) .
Diagnosis. Females ( Figs 22-27 View Figs 22-27 ) of the species can be easily recognized by the shape of the epigynum, with the septum bearing two heavily sclerotized lobes ( Figs 25-27 View Figs 22-27 ; see also LEVI, 1986:192, 193, figs 620, 621). Males of the species ( Figs 15-21 View Figs 15-21 ) are close to C. calima Levi, 1986 and C. bolivia Levi, 1986 by the general triangular shape of the bulb, bearing a broad, coiled and long embolus ( Figs 19-21 View Figs 15-21 , see also LEVI, 1986:202, 203, figs 708, 709); they can be distinguished from those of both species by the shape of the paracymbial apophysis bearing a long and concave lower portion ( Figs 18-21 View Figs 15-21 ).
Description. Male ( MCN 52197). Carapace yellow. Lateral view with brown mark on the anterior region, starting at the high of the chelicerae. Chelicerae dark brown with two serrated carina on lateral of each chelicerae. Eye region dark; legs yellow with brown marks near to the articulations ( Figs 15-17 View Figs 15-21 ). Opistossoma oval shaped, gray, anteriorly with median silver spots and lateral dark spots; posteriorly with median dark irregularly spoted transverse pattern and lateral silver spots ( Fig. 15 View Figs 15-21 ). Venter greyish with dark grey borders with a central “X” shaped portion of same color and some 3-4 silver spots. Measurements (mm): AME 0.130; ALE 0.156; PME 0.182; PLE 0.104; AME - AME 0.104; AME - ALE 0.104; PME – PME 0.156; Total Length 6.55; Carapace 3.56 long, 2.60 wide; Femur I 7.24; Patella + Tibia I 8.67; Metatarsus I 5.814; Tarsus I 1.94; Patella + Tibia II 1.63; Patella + Tibia III 2.34; Patella + Tibia IV 3.64.
Female. See LEVI, 1986:192-193; figs. 618-621.
Variation. Total length: males, 5.46-6.55; females, 6.24-7.45.
Distribution. South and Southeast of Brazil.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chrysometa cambara Levi, 1986
Massanti, Thiago B., Cavichioli, Rodney R. & Ott, Ricardo 2018 |
Chrysometa cambara LEVI, 1986:192
LEVI, H. W. 1986: 192 |