Phytoseius finitimus Ribaga, 1904
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.22073/pja.v12i1.77425 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B71F3D-FFA5-D444-FD89-9E04FE78DFCB |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Phytoseius finitimus Ribaga, 1904 |
status |
|
Phytoseius finitimus Ribaga, 1904 View in CoL View at ENA
Phytoseius finitimus Ribaga, 1904: 178 View in CoL ; Chant 1959: 108; Moraes et al. 1986: 214; 2004: 252; Duso & Fontana (2002): 127; Chant & McMurtry 2007: 129.
Phytoseius (Dubininellus) finitimus, Wainstein 1959: 1365 View in CoL .
Phytoseius (Pennaseius) finitimus, Pritchard & Baker 1962: 223 View in CoL .
Pennaseius finitimus, Schuster & Pritchard 1963: 279 .
Phytoseius (Phytoseius) finitimus View in CoL , Denmark 1966: 16.
Phytoseius dubinini ( Beglyarov, 1958) View in CoL : 116 (synonymy according to Pritchard & Baker 1962).
This species is mainly reported in Mediterranean countries, and is especially frequent in Israel,
Greece, Italy and South of France. It has been observed mainly on shrubs. A big confusion between P. finitimus and Phytoseius plumifer (Canestrini & Fanzago) has existed for a long time and a tentative solution has been proposed by Duso and Fontana (2002). We herein follow these authors and do not considered valid the synonymy between these species indicated in Moraes et al. (2004). Phytoseius finitimus has been reported on grapevines and fig tree orchards in several countries in Europe. It seems to feed on P. ulmi ( Duso and Moretto 1994) and various eriophyid mites ( Rasmy and El-Banhawy 1974b), and it consumes pollen ( Zaher et al. 1969; Rasmy and El-Banhawy 1975). High relative humidities and very hairy-leaved plants or varieties seem to be very suitable for P. finitimus ( Rasmy and El-Banhawy 1974a; Duso and Moretto 1994).
Specimens examined – one ♀ and two ♂♂. Sistan and Baluchestan Province – one ♀ and two ♂♂, Konarak city, Kahir (29 m aasl, 60° 07′ 53′′ E, 25° 35′ 24′′ N), on Citrus limon (L.) Burman ( Rutaceae ), 17.IV.2018 GoogleMaps .
World distribution – Algeria, Azores, Egypt, France, Greece, Iran, Israel, Italy, Montenegro, Morocco, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Syria, Tunisia, Türkiye, USA. Precise distribution in Iran isdocumented in Kazemi et al. (2022).
Remarks – This species is widely distributed in Iran, almost in all provinces. It is however a new record for Sistan and Boulouchestan Provinces. All character measurements fit quite well with previous measurements published by Tixier et al. (2017). Our specimens do not fit at all the redescription by Duso and Fontana (2002) of P. plumifer (Canestrini and Fanzago) very often confused with P. finitimus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Phytoseius finitimus Ribaga, 1904
Farazmand, Azadeh, Jalaeian, Mahdi, Kamali, Hashem, Saboori, Alireza, Tixier, MarieStéphane & Kreiter, Serge 2023 |
Phytoseius (Phytoseius) finitimus
Denmark, H. A. 1966: 16 |
Pennaseius finitimus
Schuster, R. O. & Pritchard, A. E. 1963: 279 |
Phytoseius (Pennaseius) finitimus, Pritchard & Baker 1962: 223
Pritchard, A. E. & Baker, E. W. 1962: 223 |
Phytoseius (Dubininellus) finitimus
Wainstein, B. A. 1959: 1365 |
Phytoseius finitimus
Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. 2007: 129 |
Moraes, G. J. de & McMurtry, J. A. & Denmark, H. A. & Campos, C. B. 2004: 252 |
Duso, C. & Fontana, P. 2002: 127 |
Moraes, G. J. de & McMurtry, J. A. & Denmark, H. A. 1986: 214 |
Chant, D. A. 1959: 108 |
Ribaga, C. 1904: 178 |