Microcope levissima, Malyutina, Marina V., 2008

Malyutina, Marina V., 2008, Microcope gen. nov. — a new deep-sea genus of Munnopsidae (Crustacea, Isopoda, Asellota), with description of two new species from the Southern Hemisphere, Zootaxa 1866, pp. 555-574 : 567-574

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.183860
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6234259
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B6F519-8D48-EB40-FF22-81663D159A30
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Microcope levissima
status	sp. nov.

Treatment

Microcope levissima View in CoL sp. nov. ( Figs. 7–11 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 )

Material examined

Holotype, male (1.1 mm), ( ZMH K- 41426), ANDEEP III St. 153–7–S, 29 March 2005, 62º32.52’-31.31’ S 64º36.44’ -37.53’ W, 2014 m.

Paratypes ( ZMH K- 41427): 2 preparatory females dissected for description, (1.2 and 1.3 mm), 1 juv. (0.8 mm) and 2 males (1.2 mm) dissected for description, same data as the holotype.

Additional material: ANDEEP I & II: 1 damage female ( ZMH K- 41428), St. 41–3–E, 26 January 2002, 59º22.24’-22.57’ S 60º04.06’ W, 2370 m; 2 females dissected for description, 1 male ( ZMH K- 41429), St. 114–4–S, 17 February 2002, 61º43.54’ S 60º44.21’-44.43’ W, 2921 m; 1 female ( ZMH K- 41430), St. 140–8– S, 21 March 2002, 58º15.98’-16.28’ S 24º53.73’ -54.09’ W, 2970 m.

Etymology. levissima refers to the smooth anterior margins of pereonites 1–4 of the species.

Description. Body ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 , 8 View FIGURE 8 ) length 1.7–1.9 width, body highest on ambulosome, height 0.35–0.4 of body length. Head length 0.2 width, antennulae inserted almost without gap in-between; clypeus 1.8 as wide and as long as labrum. Pereonites 1–2 subequal in length, pereonite 4 shortest, length about 0.3 pereonite 1 length; anterolateral margin of pereonites 1–4 smooth, pereonites 2–4 anterolateral projections moderately protruding, coxae anterior lobe more or less rounded, lateral margin of coxa with 3 setae. Natasome length 0.85 body length, width 1.6–1.8 head width; pereonite 5 lateral length 1.7–1.8 lateral length of pereonites 6 and 7 together. Pleotelson length 0.85 width, 0.35 body length, pleopodal cavity width 0.45 of pleotelson width, length 0.5 pleotelson length.

Antennula ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ) 0.4 of body length; article 1 length 1.1 width, with 3 short lateral setae, distomedial lobe with 1 long and 3 short distal robust setae; article 2 length 0.5 of article 1, with 2 distal broom and 2 simple setae; article 3 length 0.8 of article 2, flagellum of 4 articles, article 4 length 0.25 article 3 length, following two articles as long as article 3, last two articles slightly shorter than preceding, with 3 aesthetasc.

Antenna incomplete on all specimens ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 , 8 View FIGURE 8 ): article 1 shortest, articles 2–4 subequal in length, with ventrodistal stout setae, scale on article 3 with 4 distal setae.

Mandibles ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ) pars incisiva with 5 cusps; lacinia mobilis of left mandible slender, about as long as pars incisiva, with 4 teeth; spine row with 4 and 5 spines on left and right mandibles respectively; condyle length 0.3 molar length; palp strong, length 1.3 mandibular body length, width equal to molar process width, article 1 with 2 long distal setae, article 2 length 1.7 article 1 length, with 4 distal setae. Maxilla 1 ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ) lateral endite 1.2 width of mesial endite. Maxilla 2 ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ) mesial endite shortest, lateral endites longest, like middle endite with 2 long and 2 short distal setae. Maxilliped ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ) basis length 2.6 width, endite with 2 coupling hooks, distal margin with numerous simple and serrated slender setae; palp article 2 lateral margin straight, with 2 long whip setae, length 1.3 length of medial margin, article 3 medial length 3 times lateral length, distal half of medial margin dentate, with few setae; articles 3 and 4 subequal in lateral length, article 5 1.5 longer than article 4 laterally; medial lobe of article 4 broader and shorter than article 5, with 4 long distal setae, article 5 with 2 distal setae. Epipod slightly longer than basis, length 3 times width.

Pereopods ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ). Pereopod 1 length 0.5 body length, length ratios of ischium–dactylus to basis: 0.4, 0.2, 0.5, 0.5, 0.2; basis length 5.7 width, with sparse simple setae; ischium length 2.3 width, with 1 stout and 2 simple distodorsal setae and 2 ventral setae; merus length 1.3 width, with 2 distodorsal and 2 distoventral setae; carpus length 5.5 width, with 3 distodorsal and 4 ventral setae; propodus length 6 times width, with 3 distodorsal setae. Pereopods 2–4 incomplete on all specimens, basis length/width: 3.9, 3.5, 3 respectively.

Pereopods 5 and 6 ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ): carpus/propodus length ratios: 1.6, 1.4 for pereopods 5 and 6 respectively; carpus/propodus width ratios: 1.7, 1.5 for pereopods 5 and 6 respectively. Pereopod 5 length 1.2 pereopod 1 length, length ratios of ischium–dactylus to basis: 1.25, 0.5, 1.5, 1.1, 1.25; basis length 1.5 width, with few ventral setae; ischium length 2 times width, with 1 dorsal and 4 ventral simple setae; merus as long as wide, with 3 distal setae; carpus length 2.4 width, with 8 ventral and 12 dorsal setae; propodus length 2.7 width, with 7 ventral and 7 dorsal setae; dactylus length 11.3 width, claw length 0.15 dactylus length. Pereopod 6 length ratios of ischium–dactylus to basis: 1.5, 0.6, 1.8, 1.2, 1.3; basis length 2.5 width, with 2 distoventral setae; ischium length 2.6 width, with 4 stout distal setae; merus length 1.1 width, with 2 distoventral and 2 distodorsal setae; carpus length 2.7 width, with 11 ventral and 11 dorsal setae; propodus and dactylus similar in shape and size to those of pereopod 5.

Pleopods ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ): Male pleopod 1 length 3.1 width, distolateral margin with 3 plumose setae; distal margin: medial lobes rounded, slightly longer and 3.5 wider than lateral lobes, each with 6–8 distal setae. Pleopod 2 protopod length 3.6–3.8 width, distolateral margin with 7–8 setae, stylet length subequal to protopod length, sperm duct opened at midlength of stylet; exopod stout, as wide as basal article of endopod, 0.2 of protopod length. Pleopod 3 protopod as long as endopod, endopod length 2.3 of proximal width and 1.3 width of distal part, exopod 1.6 length and same width as endopod, with 3–4 lateral plumose and many thin simple setae, distal article weakly separated. Pleopod 4 endopod length 1.8 width, exopod as long as endopod, distal plumose seta longer than exopod. Pleopod 5 length 1.8 width. Female pleopod 2 ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ) length 1.45 width, distal truncate margin about as wide as proximal edge.

Uropod ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ) length 0.15 pleotelson length. Protopod length 2.7 width, medial extension after endopod insertion 0.3 of protopod length; endopod length 0.9 protopod length, with 2 stout, 2 broom and 4 simple distal setae; exopod 0.5 of endopod length and width, with 6 distal setae.

Remarks. Minicope levissima sp. nov. is similar to M. denticulata sp. nov., but can be distinguished from the latter by the following characters: smooth anterior margin of pereonites 1–4 (the margin is serrated in M. denticulata ); the distance between antennulae in M. levissima is smaller than that in M. denticulata ; the coxae of pereopods 1–4 are less acute and more rounded, whereas in M. denticalata they are larger and more acute. The female pleopod 2 of M. levissima has a broader distal margin than that of M. denticulata ; the uropod protopod of M. levissima has a shorter distomedial extension than that of M. denticulata .

Distribution: The species is only known from the type locality. Compared to the bathymetric distribution of the two other species of the genus, this species is known from the shallowest location, occurring in depths between 2014 and 2970 m.

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to Prof. Dr. Angelika Brandt and Dr. Nils Brenke for the opportunity to work with the ANDEEP and DIVA material. I would like to thank Dr. Saskia Brix and the organizing team of CeDAMar, especially Prof. Dr. Pedro Martnez Arbizu for carrying out the Workshop on deep-sea Isopoda at the DZMB ( German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research), Wilhelmshaven. I am thankful to Dr. Nils Brenke and anonymous reviewer for their corrections and comments leading to an improved manuscript. Stefanie Kaiser kindly checked and corrected the English.

References

Brandt, A. & Barthel, D. (1995) An improved supra– and epibenthic sledge for catching Peracarida (Crustacea, Malacostraca), Ophelia, 43 (1), 15–23.

Brenke, N. (2005) An epibenthic sledge for operations on marine soft bottom and bedrock. Marine Technology Society Journal, 39 (2), 10–19.

Birstein, J.A. (1970) Additions to the fauna of Isopods (Crustacea, Isopoda) of the Kurile-Kamchatka Trench. Part I. In: Fauna of the Kurile-Kamchatka Trench and its environment. akademiya Nauk USSR, Trudy Instituta Okeanologii I m. P.P.S h i r s h o v a, 86, 292 –340. (In Russian, English Translation: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1972).

Hessler, R.R. & Thistle, D. (1975) On the place of origin of deep-sea isopods. Marine Biology, 32, 155 –165.

Haugsness, J.A. & Hessler, R.R. (1979) A revision of the subfamily Syneurycopinae (Isopoda: Asellota: Eurycopidae) with a new genus and species (Bellibos buzwilsoni). Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 19 (10), 121–151.

Kussakin, O.G. (2003) Marine and brackish-water Isopoda of the cold and temperate waters of the Northern Hemisphere. III. Suborder Asellota. Part 3. Family Munnopsidae. (Opredeliteli po faune, izdavaemie Zoologicheskim Institutom Rossiyskoy Academii Nauk). St.- Petersburg, Nauka, 381 pp. (In Russian).14

Lilljeborg, W. (1864) Bidrag til knnedommen om de inom Sverige och Norrige frekommande Crustaceer af Isopodernas underordning och Tanaidernas familj. Inbjudningsskrift till hrande af de Offentliga Frelsninger. C. A. Leffler, Kongl. Acad. Boktryckare, Upsala. 31pp.

Malyutina, M.V. & Brandt, A. (2006) A revaluation of the Eurycopinae (Crustacea, Isopoda, Munnopsidae) with a description of Dubinectes gen. nov. from the southern Atlantic deep sea. Zootaxa, 1272, 1–44.

Malyutina, M.V. & Brandt, A. (2007) Diversity and zoogeography of Antarctic deep-sea Munnopsidae (Crustacea, Isopoda, Asellota) Deep Sea Research II, 54, 1790–1805.

Wilson, G.D. (1982) Two new natatory asellote isopods (Crustacea) from San Juan Archipelago, Baeonectes improvisus n. gen. n. sp. and Acanthamunnopsis milleri n. sp., with a revised description of A. hystrix Schultz. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 60 (12), 3332–3343.

Wilson, G.D. (1989) A systematic revision of the deep-sea subfamily Lipomerinae of the Isopod Crustacean family Munnopsidae. Bulletin of the Scripps Institution of oceanography University of California, San Diego, 27, 1–138.

Wilson, G.D. & Hessler, R.R. (1981) A revision of the genus Eurycope (Isopoda, Asellota) with descriptions of three new genera. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 1 (3), 401–423.

Wilson, G.D. & Thistle, D. (1985) Amuletta, new genus for Ilyarachna abyssorum Richardson, 1911 (Isopoda: Asellota: Eurycopidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology, 5 (2), 350–360.