Brachionus plicatilis, Muller, 1786
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2023.2279255 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10480020 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B687E6-220B-FFE9-FF42-FB10FE7F7355 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Brachionus plicatilis |
status |
|
Phylum Rotifera View in CoL View at ENA :
Brachionus plicatilis View in CoL
SEM
Diapausing embryos were ovoid and measured ca 134 µm in diameter (̄x = 134.0 ± 4.0 μm). The outer surface was composed of numerous smooth ridges and wrinkles, creating an overall rough surface ( Figure 2a,b View Figure 2 ).
TEM
The shell consisted of a thick apical layer and a thin basal layer. Average shell thickness was 2.30 ± 0.22 µm (SD). The outer layer, termed the alveolar layer by Munuswamy et al. (1996), had a wavy texture ( Figure 2c,d View Figure 2 ). Electron density was highest at the topmost and bottom portions of the alveolar layer, otherwise it had a similar electron density throughout its thickness and contained many ̍empty̾ pockets that were interconnected through electron-dense bridges. The basal layer [s1 of Munuswamy et al. (1996)] had an amorphous appearance that consisted of an electron lucent zone and a more electron-opaque zone below it ( Figure 2d View Figure 2 ). Thin fibres were present throughout both zones.
AFM
Topography of the outer shell showed rugosity and similar attributes to those in SEM, but with fewer details ( Figure 2e View Figure 2 ). An example force–distance curve that displays how Young̾s modulus values were collected for a single spot on one egg is shown in Figure 2f View Figure 2 . The Young̾s modulus ranged from 12.24 to 19.85 MPa with an average of 15.81 ± 2.49 MPa (SD) ( Table 1 View Table 1 ). Hardness values ranged from 1.14 × 10−2 to 5.31 × 10−2 GPa with an average hardness of 1.853 × 10−2 ±1.23 × 10−2 GPa ( Table 2 View Table 2 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |