Trilacuna jinyun Tong, Zhang & Li, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.748.1337 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9BCE8FEC-8EE0-403D-AC83-14D3EF398589 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4727645 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7B177C33-6884-40B3-BB08-A61DFACE5190 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:7B177C33-6884-40B3-BB08-A61DFACE5190 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Trilacuna jinyun Tong, Zhang & Li |
status |
sp. nov. |
Trilacuna jinyun Tong, Zhang & Li View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7B177C33-6884-40B3-BB08-A61DFACE5190
Figs 1–3 View Fig View Fig View Fig , 4A–B, E–F View Fig , 8 View Fig
Differential diagnosis
This new species is similar to Trilacuna simianshan Tong & Li, 2018 , but males can be distinguished by the large flag like protrusion and the broad dorsal branch of embolus system ( Fig. 2E, F, H View Fig ), and females by the rectangular shaped structure of endogyne ( Fig. 4F View Fig ). Males of T. simianshan have a rectangular projection and narrow dorsal branch of embolus system, and females have a cone-shaped structure of endogyne ( Tong et al. 2018: figs 3a–f, 5i).
Etymology
The specific name is a noun in apposition and refers to the type locality.
Material examined
Holotype CHINA • ♂; Chongqing Municipality, Beibei District, Jinyun Mountain , Caijiagou ; 12 Oct. 2008; Zhisheng Zhang et al. leg.; SYNU-291 .
Paratypes CHINA • 4 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; SYNU-292 to 295 • 1 ♂; Jinyun Mountain , Canal Protection Station; 4 Dec. 2010; Zhong Li and Zongxu Li leg.; SWUC-T-OO-01-1 • 3 ♀♀; Jinyun Mountain ; 12 Apr. 2010; Luyu Wang leg.; SWUC-T-OO-01-2 to 4 .
Description
Male (holotype)
BODY. Yellow; habitus as in Fig. 1A–C View Fig ; body length 2.39. Carapace ( Fig. 1D, F–G View Fig ): 1.23 long, 0.97 wide; sides granulate; lateral margin rebordered.
EYES ( Fig. 1A, G View Fig ). Well developed, arranged in a compact group; ALE, PME and PLE subequal; ALE– PLE separated by less than ALE radius, PME touching each other; posterior row recurved from above, procurved from front.
CLYPEUS ( Fig. 1G View Fig ). Sinuous in frontal view, ALE separated from edge of carapace by about 1.8 times their diameter.
MOUTHPARTS ( Fig. 1E, G View Fig ). Chelicerae straight; labium rectangular, anterior margin deeply incised; endites slender, distally strongly curved branched.
STERNUM ( Fig. 1E View Fig ). With radial furrows between coxae I–II, II–III, III–IV; surface medially strongly rugose.
ABDOMEN ( Fig. 1A–C View Fig ). Abdomen 1.30 long, 0.92 wide; booklung covers ovoid, surface smooth; dorsal scutum not fused to epigastric scutum; apodemes present, posterior spiracles connected by a shallow groove; sperm pore oval, situated between anterior spiracles.
LEG SPINATION (all spines longer than segment width). Legs I–II: tibia: v2-2-2-2-0, metatarsus: v2-2-0.
PALP ( Figs 2 View Fig , 4A–B View Fig ). Orange; 0.67 long (0.21, 0.12, 0.17, 0.17); femur greatly swollen (width/length = 0.67); bulb oval, tapering apically; embolus system ( Fig. 2C–H View Fig ) with a broad dorsal branch (db), a very
narrow thread-like ventral branch (vb), and a broad anterior branch (ab) in prolateral view, a flag like protrusion (flp) in dorsal view, and a circular projection (cp) in retrolateral view.
Female (SYNU-292)
Same as male except as noted; slightly larger than male. Body: length 2.44; habitus as in Fig. 3A– C View Fig . Carapace: 1.02 long, 0.89 wide. Endites: unmodified. Abdomen: 1.53 long, 0.98 wide. Epigaster ( Figs 3B View Fig , 4E View Fig ): middle part of posterior margin of epigastric scutum (pe) much extended posteriorly, with sclerotized recurved arches (sar) between posterior spiracles (psp). Endogyne ( Fig. 4F View Fig ): with a rectangular shaped structure (rss), at the posterior end of the rectangular shaped structure is a slender line-like structure (sls) extending anteriorly; with two lateral apodemes (ap).
Distribution
China (Chongqing) ( Fig. 8 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.