Cryptodrassus khajuriai ( Tikader & Gajbe, 1976 ) Sankaran & Caleb & Sebastian, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.673 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3A281D69-7AB3-47DB-8A38-923A9B54760B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B5D875-805D-FFEF-9594-FA49FC97F969 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Cryptodrassus khajuriai ( Tikader & Gajbe, 1976 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Cryptodrassus khajuriai ( Tikader & Gajbe, 1976) View in CoL comb. nov.
Drassyllus khajuriai Tikader & Gajbe, 1976: 432 View in CoL , figs 5–8.
Drassyllus jabalpurensis Gajbe, 2005: 136 , figs 23–27. Syn. nov.
Drassyllus khajuriai View in CoL – Tikader 1982: 512, figs 490–494. — Gajbe 2007: 489, figs 208–212.
Diagnosis
Cryptodrassus khajuriai comb. nov. seems closely related to Cryptodrassus helvolus (O. Pickard- Cambridge, 1872), as both have a large epigynal atrium. However, the former species can be distinguished from the latter by the following combination of characters: epigyne with anterior hood (epigyne of C. helvolus lacks anterior hood), highly coiled copulatory ducts with thick proximal and thin distal parts (copulatory ducts of C. helvolus less coiled and nearly uniform in diameter along the entire length) and globular receptacles ( C. helvolus with nearly oval receptacles) (compare Figs 1 View Fig C–D, 2C–D with Chatzaki & Russell-Smith 2017: figs 5–6).
Material examined
Holotype of D. khajuriai
INDIA • ♀; Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur, rest house in Madla ; 28 Feb. 1974; H. Khajuria leg.; NZC-ZSI, Kolkata 5043/18 .
Holotype of D. jabalpurensis
INDIA • ♀; Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur, Bhirki Village on Jabalpur-Chargawan road; 24 Nov. 1970; D.K. Ghosal leg.; NZC-ZSI, Kolkata 5452/18 .
Supplementary description
Female (holotype, Fig. 1 View Fig )
Body length 5.38. Prosoma: length 2.18, width 1.76. Opisthosoma: length 3.20, width 1.71. Eye diameters: ALE 0.12, AME 0.13, PLE 0.11, PME 0.19. Eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.05, AME– PME 0.09, PME–PLE 0.04. Chelicerae length 0.67. Measurement of leg II 5.27 [1.51, 0.87, 1.03, 1.13, 0.73]. Epigyne (holotype, Fig. 1 View Fig C–D): Epigynal plate moderately sclerotized, triangular, with smoothly triangular atrium with anterior hood ( Fig. 1C View Fig ). Copulatory openings indistinct. Copulatory ducts long, tubular, thick proximally and narrowed distally, obliquely twisted ( Fig. 1D View Fig ). Receptacles small, spherical, nearly contiguous, lying adjacent to posterior epigynal margin ( Fig. 1D View Fig ). Fertilization ducts narrow, diverging ( Fig. 1D View Fig ).
Male
Unknown.
Justification of the transfer
Tikader & Gajbe (1976) described D. khajuriai on the basis of a female specimen collected in Madhya Pradesh. It resembles Drassyllus spp. only in the posterior median eyes, which are the largest and remaining contiguous in both Cryptodrassus and Drassyllus (see Murphy 2007: figs 184, 528; herein Fig. 1B View Fig ). Detailed examination of the holotype of D. khajuriai revealed that it has all of the characteristic features of Cryptodrassus spp. as described and illustrated for Cryptodrassus hungaricus (Balogh, 1935) , the type species of the genus ( Murphy 2007: figs 528–529; Kovblyuk & Nadolny 2010: figs 7–8), Cryptodrassus helvolus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1872) ( Levy 1998: fig. 126; Chatzaki & Russell-Smith 2017: fig. 5) and Cryptodrassus helvoloides ( Levy, 1998) ( Chatzaki & Russell-Smith 2017: fig. 11): PMEs largest, irregular, all other eyes round, cheliceral promargin with three and retromargin with one tooth and epigyne with wide, anterior atrium. Considering these observations, we propose to transfer D. khajuriai to Cryptodrassus .
Justification of the synonymy
A detailed examination of the holotype of D. jabalpurensis shows that it has diagnostic features of D. khajuriai : triangular epigynal atrium with single anterior hood, highly coiled obliquely twisted copulatory ducts with thick proximal and narrow distal parts and spherical and contiguous receptacles (compare Fig. 1 View Fig C–D with Fig. 2 View Fig C–D). Based on these observations, we propose to consider D. jabalpurensis as a junior synonym of D. khajuriai .
Remarks
The ZSI collection has one glass bottle for D. khajuriai , labeled as ‘holotype’ (5043/18), containing a female specimen in fairly good condition, with only left leg II. The same bottle has a small glass vial containing the dissected epigyne. The ZSI collection has one glass bottle for D. jabalpurensis , labeled as ‘holotype’ (with no register number), containing a female specimen in bad condition. The same bottle has a small glass vial containing the dissected epigyne.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cryptodrassus khajuriai ( Tikader & Gajbe, 1976 )
Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D. & Sebastian, Pothalil A. 2020 |
Drassyllus jabalpurensis
Gajbe U. A. 2005: 136 |
Drassyllus khajuriai
Gajbe U. A. 2007: 489 |
Tikader B. K. 1982: 512 |
Drassyllus khajuriai
Tikader B. K. & Gajbe U. A. 1976: 432 |