Corydoras colossus, Tencatt & Grant & Bentley, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1982-0224-2023-0105 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8386C6A3-E15C-46AB-AC46-344BCFCA5E9D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B487B4-FFFB-A513-473C-FA17FB0FF914 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Corydoras colossus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Corydoras colossus , new species urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:AFD6F173-BEB8-45B5-88BB-91543134E872
( Figs. 1‒11 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 ; Tab. 1)
Corydoras sp. CW045. — Alexandrou, Taylor, 2011:115 (“CW45”; phylogeny; member of lineage 9). —Fuller, Evers, 2011:88 (code number).
Holotype. MNRJ 54421 View Materials , 44.5 mm SL, Brazil, Amazonas , Jutaí , rio Jutaí , reportedly near confluence with rio Solimões, rio Amazonas basin, ca. 02°45’S 66°48’W, 2022, collector’s name unknown. GoogleMaps
Paratypes. BMNH 2022.9.28.1-5, 5, 44.4–47.9 mm SL ; CITL 928 , 1 of 3, 42.2 mm SL, 2 c&s of 3, 43.1–48.4 mm SL; CPUFMT 8147, 2, 39.4–42.5 mm SL; INPA 60221, 2 View Materials , 43.6 View Materials – 48.2 View Materials , mm SL; MZUSP 129238, 2 View Materials , 45.0– 59.8 mm SL; NUP 24828, 2, 44.8–44.9 mm SL, all collected with the holotype .
Diagnosis. Corydoras colossus can be distinguished from its congeners, except for C. araguaiaensis Sands, 1990 , C. burgessi Axelrod, 1987 , C. concolor Weitzman, 1961 , C. esperanzae Castro, 1987 , C. evelynae Rössel, 1963 , C. eversi Tencatt & Britto, 2016 , C. granti Tencatt , Lima & Britto, 2019, C. julii Steindachner, 1906 , C. melanistius Regan, 1912 , C. oiapoquensis Nijssen, 1972 , C. parallelus Burgess, 1993 , C. pavanelliae Tencatt & Ohara, 2016 , C. polystictus Regan, 1912 , C. schwartzi Rössel, 1963 , C. surinamensis Nijssen, 1970 , C. trilineatus Cope, 1872 , and C. xinguensis Nijssen, 1972 , by having ventral surface of trunk with small- to relatively large-sized coalescent platelets, forming a typical mosaic-like pattern (vs. platelets on ventral surface of trunk, when present, small-sized and not coalescent, not forming a mosaic-like pattern). The new species can be distinguished from C. araguaiaensis , C. eversi , C. granti , C. julii , C. pavanelliae , C. polystictus , C. trilineatus , and C. xinguensis by the presence of a large, arched dark brown or black patch extending from interopercle region to posterior process of parieto-supraoccipital, transversally crossing orbit and forming typical mask-like blotch (vs. mask-like blotch absent); from C. evelynae , C. oiapoquensis , C. schwartzi , and C. surinamensis by the absence of conspicuous dark markings on caudal fin (vs. caudal fin with conspicuous dark brown or black blotches, which are typically roughly transversally aligned, forming bars); from C. parallelus plus C. evelynae , C. schwartzi and C. surinamensis by the absence of longitudinal rows of dark blotches on flanks (vs. at least two rows of conspicuous dark blotches roughly longitudinally aligned on flanks, which can be variably fused, forming stripes); from C. concolor and C. esperanzae by having region of first dorsolateral body plate surrounding posterior process of parieto-supraoccipital clearly lighter than remaining portions of head, forming a V-shaped pattern in dorsal view (vs. absence of a V-shaped pale area on predorsal region of body) and by presenting anterior portion of dorsal fin with conspicuous concentration of dark brown or black chromatophores, forming a dark patch (vs. dorsal fin uniformly colored, not forming dark patches or blotches); from C. burgessi and C. melanistius plus C. parallelus and C. surinamensis by having the anterior portion of dorsal-fin base with conspicuous concentration of dark brown or black chromatophores, forming a dark patch slightly darker than ground color of body (vs. dark patch on dorsal-fin base well defined, conspicuously standing out of the ground color of body). The new species can be further distinguished from C. burgessi , C. melanistius , C. oiapoquensis , C. parallelus , C. pavanelliae , C. polystictus , and C. surinamensis by having mosaic-like pattern of plates entirely or almost entirely covering ventral surface trunk (vs. mosaic-like pattern of plates restricted to some portions of ventral surface trunk, representing up to about 50% of its area).
Description. Morphometric data in Tab. 1. Head laterally compressed with convex dorsal profile, roughly triangular in dorsal view. Snout typically moderately developed and somewhat straight; variably short in size and rounded. Head profile convex from tip of snout to anterior nares, ascending nearly straight or slightly convex from this point to dorsal-fin origin; region of anterior portion of parieto-supraoccipital and/or region of frontals variably slightly concave. Profile slightly convex along dorsal-fin base. Postdorsal-fin body profile slightly concave to adipose-fin spine, concave from this point to caudal-fin base; region between dorsal and preadipose platelets slightly convex in some specimens. Ventral profile of body nearly straight or slightly convex from isthmus to pectoral girdle, and slightly convex from this point until pelvic girdle. Profile slightly convex from pelvic girdle to base of first anal-fin ray, ascending concave until caudal-fin base. Body roughly elliptical in cross section at pectoral girdle, gradually becoming more compressed toward caudal fin.
Eye rounded, located dorsolaterally on head. Orbit delimited anteriorly by lateral ethmoid, anterodorsally by frontal, posterodorsally by sphenotic, posteroventrally by infraorbital 2, and anteroventrally by infraorbital 1 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Anterior and posterior nares close to each other, only separated by flap of skin. Anterior naris tubular. Posterior naris close to anterodorsal margin of orbit, separated from it by distance similar to naris diameter. Mouth small, subterminal, width similar to bony orbit diameter. Maxillary barbel ranging from short to moderate in size, not reaching anteroventral limit of gill opening. Outer mental barbel slightly longer than maxillary barbel. Inner mental barbel fleshy, base of each counterpart slightly separated from each other. Small rounded papillae covering entire surface of all barbels, upper and lower lips, snout and isthmus.
Mesethmoid relatively short, with anterior tip poorly developed, slightly smaller than 50% of bone length; posterior portion wide, entirely covered by thick layer of skin or partially exposed and bearing small odontodes. Nasal capsule delimited posteriorly and dorsally by frontal, anteriorly by mesethmoid, and ventrally and posteriorly by lateral ethmoid. Nasal slender, laterally curved, inner margin with poorly- to moderatelydeveloped laminar expansion contacting frontal and mesethmoid; only in contact with frontal in some specimens; outer margin with strongly reduced to poorly-developed laminar expansion ( Figs.2–3 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 ).Lateral ethmoid moderately deep in lateral view, moderately expanded anteriorly, with anterodorsal expansion slightly distant from nasal, and anterior margin contacting posterior portion of mesethmoid ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ). Frontal elongated, narrow, width less than half of entire length; anterior projection short, size smaller than nasal length ( Figs. 2–3 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 ). Frontal fontanel large, slender, and somewhat ellipsoid; posterior tip extension slightly surpassing anterior margin of parieto-supraoccipital ( Figs. 2A View FIGURE 2 , 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Sphenotic somewhat trapezoid, contacting parieto-supraoccipital dorsally, pterotic-extrascapular posteriorly, second infraorbital posteroventrally and frontal anteriorly ( Figs. 2A View FIGURE 2 , 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Pterotic-extrascapular roughly pipe-shaped, with posteriormost portion contacting first lateral-line ossicle, posteroventral margin contacting cleithrum, and anteroventral margin contacting opercle; posterior expansion almost entirely covering lateral opening of swimbladder capsule, leaving slender area on its dorsal margin covered only by thick layer of skin ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ). Parieto-supraoccipital wide, posterior process long, relatively wide, contacting nuchal plate; region of contact between posterior process and nuchal plate covered by thick layer of skin ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).
Two laminar infraorbitals with minute odontodes. Infraorbital 1 large, ventral laminar expansion ranging from moderately to well developed ( Figs. 2A View FIGURE 2 , 4A View FIGURE 4 ); anterior portion with well-developed laminar expansion, surpassing middle of nasal capsule; inner laminar expansion poorly developed ( Figs. 2A View FIGURE 2 , 4B View FIGURE 4 ). Infraorbital 2 small, slender, with posterior laminar expansion poorly to moderately developed ( Figs. 2A View FIGURE 2 , 4A View FIGURE 4 ); posteroventral margin contacting posterodorsal ridge of hyomandibula, posterior margin not in direct contact with opercle, and posterodorsal edge contacting only sphenotic ( Figs. 2A View FIGURE 2 , 4B View FIGURE 4 ); inner laminar expansion poorly developed ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ). Posterodorsal ridge of hyomandibula close to its articulation with opercle slender, exposed, and bearing small odontodes ( Figs. 2A View FIGURE 2 , 4B, C View FIGURE 4 ). Dorsal ridge of hyomandibula between pterotic-extrascapular and opercle covered by thick layer of skin ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ). Interopercle entirely or almost entirely covered by thick layer of skin; posterior portion variably exposed and bearing odontodes; subtriangular, anterior projection well developed ( Figs. 2A View FIGURE 2 , 4C View FIGURE 4 ). Preopercle elongated, relatively slender; minute odontodes on external surface ( Figs. 2A View FIGURE 2 , 4B, C View FIGURE 4 ). Opercle dorsoventrally elongated, with width typically slightly smaller than half of its entire length; free margin convex, without serrations and covered by small odontodes ( Figs. 2A View FIGURE 2 , 4C View FIGURE 4 ).
Four branchiostegal rays decreasing in size posteriorly. Hypobranchial 1 deep; hypobranchial 2 somewhat triangular, tip ossified and directed towards anterior portion, posterior margin cartilaginous; ossified portion moderately developed, its size slightly larger than cartilaginous portion. Five ceratobranchials with expansions increasing posteriorly; ceratobranchial 1 with small process on anterior margin of mesial portion; ceratobranchial 3 with continuous laminar expansion on postero-lateral margin; laminar expansion variably notched; ceratobranchial 5 toothed on posterodorsal surface, with 59 to 67 (2) teeth aligned in one row. Four epibranchials with similar size; epibranchial 2 slightly larger than others, with small pointed process on laminar expansion of posterior margin; epibranchial 3 with mesially-curved uncinate process on laminar expansion of posterior margin; uncinate process of left side in specimen CITL 928, 48.4 mm SL reduced, roughly triangular (apparently due to malformation). Two wide pharyngobranchials (3 and 4); pharyngobranchial 3 with roughly rounded or triangular laminar expansion on posterior margin; laminar expansion typically notched. Upper tooth plate roughly oval, 69 to 78(2) teeth aligned in two rows on posteroventral surface; rows closely aligned.
Lateral-line canal reaching cephalic laterosensory system through pterotic-extrascapular, branching twice before reaching sphenotic: pterotic branch, with single pore, preoperculomandibular branch conspicuously reduced, with single pore opening at postotic main canal; postotic main canal widens just posterior to pterotic branch. Sensory canal continuing through pterotic-extrascapular, reaching sphenotic as temporal canal, which splits into two branches: one branch giving rise to infraorbital canal, other branch connecting to frontal through supraorbital canal, both with single pore. Supraorbital canal branched, running through nasal bone. Epiphyseal branch conspicuously reduced; pore opening close to supraorbital main canal, directed towards frontal fontanel. Nasal canal with three openings, first on posterior edge, second on posterolateral portion and typically fused with first pore, and third on anterior edge. Infraorbital canal running through entire infraorbital 2, extending to infraorbital 1 and typically opening into two pores. Preoperculomandibular branch giving rise to preoperculo-mandibular canal, which runs through almost entire preopercle with three openings, leading to pores 3, 4, and 5, respectively; pore 3 variably opening at posterodorsal ridge of hyomandibula.
Dorsal fin subtriangular, located just posterior to second dorsolateral body plate. Dorsal-fin rays II,8*(12), posterior margin of dorsal-fin spine with 23 to 27 strongly reduced to poorly-developed serrations; most serrations directed towards tip of spine; some serrations variably perpendicularly directed; serrations absent close to origin of spine; small odontodes on anterior and lateral surfaces of spine ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ). Nuchal plate moderately developed, almost entirely exposed, with minute odontodes. Spinelet short; spine strongly well developed, with adpressed distal tip conspicuously surpassing posterior origin of dorsal-fin base, variably reaching anterior portion of adipose fin. Pectoral fin roughly triangular, its origin just posterior to gill opening. Pectoral-fin I,8(7), I,8,i*(4), I,9(1), posterior margin of pectoral spine with 42 to 50 strongly reduced to poorly-developed serrations along almost its entire length, absent close to origin of spine; most serrations directed towards tip of spine; some serrations perpendicularly directed and/or bifid; variably with some fused serrations; small odontodes on anterior, dorsal and ventral surfaces of spine ( Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 ). Anteroventral portion of cleithrum exposed; posterolateral portion of scapulocoracoid moderately developed, exposed, with anterior portion slightly expanded anteriorly, not in contact with anteroventral portion of cleithrum; exposed areas bearing small odontodes. Opening of axillary gland sensu Kiehl et al. (2006) located just posterior to pectoral-fin spine base (see Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ).
Pelvic fin oblong, located just below posteroventral margin of cleithrum or first ventrolateral body plate, and at vertical through first or second branched dorsal-fin ray. Pelvic-fin rays i,5*(12). Anterior internal process of basipterygium well developed and conspicuously laterally expanded, with obliquely placed dorsal lamina, converging mesially towards anterior edge of process; anterior external process laminar, somewhat falciform, well developed and conspicuously expanded posteriorly; dorsal ischiac process well developed, somewhat falciform, with anterior laminar expansion irregular, moderately expanded anteriorly, and posterior laminar expansion roughly triangular, moderately to conspicuously expanded posteriorly; ventral ischiac process clearly smaller than dorsal process, roughly triangular, clearly bent anteriorly ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ). Adipose fin roughly triangular, separated from base of last dorsal-fin ray by six and seven dorsolateral body plates. Anal fin subtriangular, located just posterior to 11 th, 12 th or 13 th ventrolateral body plates, and at vertical through adipose-fin spine base or region of preadipose platelets. Anal-fin rays i,6,i*(1), ii,6(10), i,7(1). Caudal fin bilobed, with dorsal and ventral lobes similar in size or dorsal lobe slightly larger than ventral lobe. Caudal-fin rays i,12,i*(12), with generally five or six dorsal and ventral procurrent rays; small cartilage between upper principal and procurrent caudal-fin rays in specimen CITL 928, 43.1 mm SL (presumably opisthural cartilage (Monod, 1968; McDowall, 1999)) ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ).
Three laterosensory canals on trunk; first ossicle tubular, second ossicle laminar, both bearing small odontodes; third encased in third dorsolateral body plate. Body plates with minute odontodes scattered over exposed area, with conspicuous line of odontodes confined to posterior margins. Dorsolateral body plates 23*(12); Ventrolateral body plates 20(4), 21*(8). Dorsolateral body plates along dorsal-fin base 5(8), 6*(2). Dorsolateral body plates between adipose- and caudal-fin 6(1), 7*(9). Preadipose platelets 3(4), 4*(5), 5(1). Ventral surface of trunk between posteroventral margin of cleithrum and pelvic-fin origin laterally delimited only by first ventrolateral body plate or posteroventral margin of cleithrum nearly touching first pelvic-fin ray, with no ventrolateral body plate between them; ventral portion of first ventrolateral body plate moderately expanded anteriorly. Small platelets covering base of caudal-fin rays. Small platelets disposed dorsally and ventrally between junctions of lateral plates on posterior portion of caudal peduncle. Anterior margin of orbit, above region of junction between frontal and lateral ethmoid, region around nasal capsule, dorsal and lateral surface of snout, including upper lip, with small- to relatively large-sized platelets bearing odontodes; platelets on snout conspicuously more concentrated above mesethmoid; platelets in specimen CITL 928, 43.1 mm SL clearly smaller and fewer. Ventral surface of trunk mostly covered by small- to relatively large-sized coalescent platelets, forming typical mosaic-like pattern; platelets irregular in shape and bearing odontodes ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ); specimen CITL 928, 43.1 mm SL with few and sparse platelets on ventral surface of trunk.
Vertebral count 21(1), 22(1); ribs 6(2); first pair conspicuously large, its middle portion closely connected to first ventrolateral body plate; its tip connected to anterior external process of basipterygium. Parapophysis of complex vertebra well developed.
Coloration in alcohol. Overall color of body in Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 . Ground color of body brownish yellow to greyish yellow, with top of head dark brown or black. Dorsal, lateral and ventral surface of head, and lateral surface of cleithrum densely covered by dark brown or black chromatophores, not forming small blotches; region of first dorsolateral body plate surrounding posterior process of parieto-supraoccipital (forming V-shaped pattern in dorsal view), region of pterotic-extrascapular and posterior portion of opercle clearly lighter than remaining portions of head, and anteroventral portion of cleithrum similarly paler; large, arched dark brown or black patch extending from interopercle region to posterior process of parieto-supraoccipital, transversally crossing orbit and forming typical mask-like blotch; some specimens with less evident mask-like blotch; ventral surface of head with relatively less concentrated chromatophores; posterior margin of cleithrum with conspicuous concentration of dark brown or black chromatophores, forming thin dark line, which is typically more evident on dorsal half of cleithrum. Border of pores of laterosensory canals typically with conspicuous concentration of dark brown or black chromatophores. Anterodorsal portion of trunk, around anterior portion of dorsal-fin base, with relatively large, dark brown or black blotch, which is slightly darker than ground color of body. Remaining portions of dorso- and ventrolateral body plates densely covered by dark brown or black chromatophores, not forming conspicuous blotches; some specimens with diffuse rounded, irregular or vertically elongated dark blotches; ventral portion of ventrolateral body plates variably with less concentrated chromatophores. Posterior margin of body plates with conspicuous concentration of dark brown or black chromatophores, forming thin dark lines. Dorsal fin with conspicuous dark brown or black patch on its anterior portion, typically more evident between spine and second branched ray, remaining portion of fin with clearly less concentrated dark brown or black chromatophores, variably forming small, diffuse rounded to irregular blotches. Pectoral, pelvic and caudal fins covered by dark brown or black chromatophores, typically more concentrated on rays and not forming conspicuous blotches; caudal fin with diffuse dark markings in some specimens. Adipose fin covered by dark brown or black chromatophores, generally more concentrated along ventral margin of its membrane and on portion of membrane close to its spine, variably forming diffuse, irregular dark patches. Anal fin covered by dark brown or black chromatophores, typically more concentrated on rays and forming small, diffuse blotches, which are roughly transversally or obliquely aligned in one or two rows.
Coloration in life. Similar to color pattern of preserved specimens, but with lighter ground color of body ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 , 11A View FIGURE 11 ). Body covered by greenish yellow iridescent coloration; region of first dorsolateral body plate surrounding posterior process of parieto-supraoccipital typically with yellow to orange bright patch, forming V-shaped pattern in dorsal view ( Figs. 6A, B View FIGURE 6 ); yellow to orange bright patches on opercle and cleithrum ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ). Unpreserved non-type aquarium specimens can range from the color pattern above to all the body, snout, and fin rays being fully black.
Sexual dimorphism. As well-documented in Corydoradinae (Nijssen, Isbrücker, 1980b; Britto, 2003; Spadella et al., 2017), male specimens of C. colossus present a genital papilla, which is somewhat tubular in shape. Even though the presence of elongated dorsal-fin spine plus two first dorsal-fin branched rays have been associated with dimorphic males (Tencatt et al., 2014), some mature aquarium specimens of C. colossus , including males and females, may present first, and sometimes second, dorsal-fin ray greatly extended.
Geographical distribution. Corydoras colossus is so far only known from the rio Jutaí, reportedly near its confluence with the rio Solimões, Amazon basin, Amazonas State, Brazil ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ). It is possible that it is found in the streams that drain into the main river, or further upstream (H. Bleher, 2022, pers. comm.). Fuller, Evers (2011) state that the first specimens introduced into the hobby were reportedly from Lago Aiapuá, rio Purus, but this has since been corrected in the aquarium literature to rio Jutaí.
Ecological notes. The rio Jutaí is typically characterized as a blackwater river but has intermediate conditions between white and blackwaters and a transitional pattern, with mean parameters of: pH of 5.96, electrical conductivity of 8.71 μS/cm, and total suspended solids of 46.56 mg /l (Ríos-Villamizar et al., 2014). Substrate is generally white sand; dead leaves and wood from riparian vegetation, with little or no aquatic vegetation (H. Bleher, 2022, pers. comm.). Apparently, C. colossus occurs in syntopy with Corydoras sp. CW116 and CW117 as these three species are often imported for the aquarium hobby in the same batches. Several of the type specimens have multiple large, golden colored, encysted metacercariae of an unidentified parasite, along their ventral region.
Etymology. The specific epithet “ colossus ” derives from the Ancient Greek ΚολοσσΌΣ (kolossós), which means “large/giant statue”, alluding to the relatively large, robust, armored body of the new species. A noun in apposition.
Conservation status. Currently, the new species is known only from its type locality, the rio Jutaí, Amazonas State, Brazil. Despite the single record, the lower portion of the rio Jutaí flows within two Conservation Units, the Estação Ecológica de Jutaí-Solimões and the Reserva Extrativista do Rio Jutaí. It is important to emphasize that the species is relatively frequent in the aquarium trade, though available in small numbers. Therefore, considering the currently available data and according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) categories and criteria (IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee, 2022), Corydoras colossus would be classified as Least Concern (LC).
Remarks. In captivity, it was possible to observe variations in the color pattern of the new species, apparently, at least in part, affected by the ambient background or substrate, although this has not been tested. In lighter settings the body not covered by the black saddle under the dorsal-fin is usually tan to light brown, sometimes with the lateral body plates posteriorly bordered with small melanophores; and the fins not covered by the black markings on the first two branched dorsal-fin rays and membranes can be hyaline. In darker ambient surroundings or substrate those areas can become partially or fully black. Aquarium observations on the type and non-vouchered specimens showed that individuals can chronically exhibit both extremes or a point in-between the range. Corydoras colossus can also sometimes be observed in its dark phase, on a light substrate. This range of chronic display of color led to C. colossus being given the two different trade names; ‘Lessex’ for the lighter phase and ‘Resex’ for the darker one.
Corydoras colossus has been bred under aquarium conditions by Hans-Georg Evers, who documented its ontogenetic development from 9.0 to 28.0 mm LT, showing general changes in external morphology and color pattern ( Figs. 11B–E View FIGURE 11 ). Specimen with 9.0 mm TL in final flexion stage ( Fig. 11B View FIGURE 11 ); head slightly depressed, becoming gradually deeper along individual’s growth, with short and rounded snout; barbels moderate in size and with well-developed papillae, which will gradually become less developed along individual’s growth; eye relatively large; median fin fold present, slightly absorbed, extending from postdorsal region to genital opening; dorsal, caudal, pectoral and pelvic fins distinct, with dorsal and caudal fins not detached from fin fold; dorsal-, caudal- and pectoral-fin rays clearly distinct, and beginning of formation of pelvic-fin rays; caudal-fin asymmetrical, dorsal portion distinctly longer than ventral; hypural plates visible by transparency; body plates absent; body covered by dark-brown or black chromatophores, clearly more concentrated on top of head and on area above cleithrum; small- to moderate-sized, irregular to rounded blotches on trunk, which are roughly longitudinally aligned; trunk color pattern gradually turning longitudinal arrangement into mottled aspect along individual’s growth; conspicuous, oblique dark stripe from anteroventral margin of orbit to upper lip lateral area; oblique dark patch from posteroventral margin of orbit to anteroventral margin of opercle; caudal fin with diffuse dark markings and single, conspicuous black dot on middle portion of caudal-fin base, which gradually becomes indistinct during growth; body covered by greenish yellow iridescent coloration.
Specimens with 13.0 mm TL in early post-flexion stage ( Fig. 11C View FIGURE 11 ); median fin fold more retreated, with area where adipose fin will be formed distinct; pelvic and anal fins distinct, detached from fin fold; pelvic- and anal-fin rays distinct; dorsal- and caudalfins still not detached from fin fold; caudal fin bilobed; body more pigmented, especially on trunk; dorsal and anal fins with dark markings; caudal fin slightly more spotted. Specimen with 17.0 mm TL in final post-flexion stage ( Fig. 11D View FIGURE 11 ) displays slightly more reduced median fold, with dorsal fin detached and caudal fin partially detached; adipose-fin spine visible but adipose fin indistinct; beginning of formation of lateral body plates; color pattern similar to previous stage but with more evident dark markings. Juvenile specimen with 22.0 mm TL ( Fig. 11E View FIGURE 11 ) with median fold completely absorbed; adipose and caudal fins distinct; dorsal- and pectoral-fin spines clearly stronger and distinct from remaining soft rays of their respective fins; oblique dark stripe from anteroventral margin of orbit to upper lip lateral area diffuse; black patch transversally crossing orbit, forming typical mask-like blotch; anterior portion of dorsal-fin base with large, conspicuous black patch; anterior portion of dorsal fin also blackened.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Corydoras colossus
Tencatt, Luiz Fernando Caserta, Grant, Steven & Bentley, Rebecca Frances 2023 |
Corydoras sp.
Alexandrou MA & Oliveira C & Maillard M & McGill RAR & Newton J & Creer S & Taylor MI 2011: 115 |