Troglocaris (Xiphocaridinella) fagei ( Birštein, 1939 ), Birstein, 1939
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3754.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F6749B0E-1F58-4B02-BFB1-5D1564B201A4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6123452 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B42D6F-FF82-C448-FF16-FF7D7C7FFC18 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Troglocaris (Xiphocaridinella) fagei ( Birštein, 1939 ) |
status |
|
Troglocaris (Xiphocaridinella) fagei ( Birštein, 1939) View in CoL
( Figs. 13 View FIGURE 13 , 14 View FIGURE 14 )
Troglocaris schmidti fagei Birštein, 1939: 964 View in CoL , figs. 3 [type locality: New Athos Cave, Abkhazia].
Material examined. 10 non-ovigerous females, 2 males, Abkhazia, 43°5'44"N 40°48'53"E, New Athos (Novo- Afonskaya) Cave, Anatolia Lake in the first lake of the cave, coll. E. Chertoprud & D. Palatov October 2011.
Measurements. The largest female has tbl.— 31 mm, pcl.— 15 mm; the largest male has tbl.— 22 mm, pcl.— 13 mm.
Remarks. The examined adult specimens show variation in rostral length and form of supraorbital teeth (see Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 ). Rostrum mostly smooth, with completely reduced dorsal teeth, but in some specimens 1 or 2 tiny dorsal teeth may present; the rostral length greatly vary from long and getting distally thin rostrum overreaching the distal margin of basal antennular segment ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 a, b) to short triangular rostrum reaching the midlength of basal antennular segment ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 e–h); supraocular teeth also showing variation from well developed ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 d) to poorly developed from one side ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 f) and complete absence of both teeth ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 b). Such variations easily cover morphological difference between Troglocaris (Xiphocaridinella) fagei ( Birštein, 1939) (present paper, Figs. 13 View FIGURE 13 , 14 View FIGURE 14 ) and Troglocaris (Xiphocaridinella) ablaskiri ( Birštein, 1939) ( Birštein, 1948: Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ) known from Abraskila Cave, or Achkshe-Tyz-Gua Cave, situated less than 100 km east from New Athon Cave suggesting that they are possibly conspecific. Rostral form and its armature were used by Birštein (1939: 965) as the main morphological features for separation of these species. Anyway, during the present study we have no fresh material from the type locality of Troglocaris (Xiphocaridinella) ablaskiri ( Birštein, 1939) for morphological and DNA analysis to confirm or refute this hypothesis.
Distribution. The species is known exclusively from cave lakes inside New Athos (Novo-Afonskaya) or Psyrtskha Cave, Abkhazia (see Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Troglocaris (Xiphocaridinella) fagei ( Birštein, 1939 )
Marin, Ivan & Sokolova, Agniya 2014 |
Troglocaris schmidti fagei Birštein, 1939 : 964
Birstein 1939: 964 |