Pictetiella, Illies, 1966
Judson, Sarah W. & Nelson, C. Riley, 2012, 3541, Zootaxa 3541, pp. 1-118 : 43
|
publication ID |
505937B0-9F57-4068-82E6-8553826DD5AA |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:505937B0-9F57-4068-82E6-8553826DD5AA |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5258163 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B387E7-154C-811C-FF5A-FC99FBF2541F |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Pictetiella |
| status |
|
DIAGNOSIS: The tenth tergum of the male is cleft ( Fig. 284) and delineated by spinulose patches, which do not form protruding hemitergal processes. Males have a poorly developed epiproct, which barely protrudes posteriorly ( Fig. 284). The female subgenital plate is largely expanded posteriorly ( Fig. 285). Nymphs have conspicous submental gills ( Fig. 244), longer than those in Arcynopteryx and Skwala , but lack the thoracic gills found in Megarcys .
DISTRIBUTION—Global: Amphi-Pacific— Regional: AOB^— Aimag: KhG^.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.