Lispinus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.190786 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6218574 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B387DB-FFC2-FFAD-469B-F8FA8A9EF80D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lispinus |
status |
|
Key to Lispinus View in CoL species of Peru
1. Sides of pronotum dilating posteriad or parallel, without distinct emargination anteriad posterior angle ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 A, 10B) .............................................................................................................................................................................. 2
- Sides of pronotum narrowing to posterior angles or with distinct emargination anteriad posterior angle ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 C– 10F) ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5
2. Sides of pronotum dilating posteriad, pronotum nearly twice as wide as long ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 A); 3rd antennomere nearly 3
times as long as 2nd ............................................................................................................. L. laticollis Erichson, 1840 View in CoL - Sides of pronotum in front of posterior angles parallel, pronotum slightly wider than long ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 B); 3rd antennom- ere not more than 2 times as long as 2nd........................................................................................................................ 3
3. Each elytron with lateral furrow on disc ( Figs. 5–7 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ); pronotum slightly narrowed at middle, but parallel in front of posterior angles; microsculpture of elytra closely and longitudinally reticulate, iridescently shiny .............................. ................................................................................................................................................ L. striola Erichson, 1840 View in CoL
- Elytra without lateral furrows on disk, only with two large setiferous punctures each; microsculpture of elytra net- like reticulate and not iridescently shiny....................................................................................................................... 4
4. Elytra very finely and sparsely punctate ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 H); 3rd antennomere less than twice as long as 2nd, paramera of aede- agus trilobed ............................................................................................................... L. laeviusculus Bernhauer, 1910 View in CoL
- Elytra densely and distinctly punctuate; 3rd antennomere twice as long as 2nd; paramera of aedeagus bilobed ............ .......................................................................................................................................... L. attenuatus Erichson, 1840 View in CoL
5. Pronotum straightly narrowed to posterior angles, without emargination in front of posterior angels ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 C) ...... 6
- Pronotum distinctly emarginate in front of posterior angles, emargination short in some species ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 D–10F). 12
6. Body larger, 5.4–5.7 mm; elytra with net-like reticulate microsculpture, fine punctation and on disc with two large setiferous punctures each .......................................................................................... L. quadripunctulus Fauvel, 1865 View in CoL
- Body smaller, <5.0 mm................................................................................................................................................ 7
7. Body smaller, 3.8–4.0 mm; elytra with weak, longitudinally reticulate microsculpture, surface shiny ...................... 8
- Body larger, 4.5–4.8 mm, with more distinct microsculpture of elytra ....................................................................... 9
8. Elytra quadrate, their punctation sparser, distance between punctures about the same as diameter of punctures ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 I) ............................................................................................................................................ L. newtoni Irmler, 1994 View in CoL
- Elytra longer than wide, their punctation denser and deeper, distance between punctures much less than diameter of punctures ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5 – 8 E) .............................................................................................................................. L. minimus View in CoL n.sp.
9. Elytra with weak net-like reticulate microsculpture ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 5 – 8 E); pronotum with fine and sparse punctation, distance between punctures twice as wide as diameter of punctures, surface of pronotum and elytra slightly shiny ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 5 – 8 P)... ........................................................................................................................................................... L. speciosus View in CoL n.sp.
- Ground sculpture of elytra dense and longitudinally reticulate, surface of elytra dull .............................................. 10
10. Posterior angles of pronotum obtusely rounded; endophallus of aedeagus with one torsion .... L. tardus Sharp, 1887 View in CoL
- Posterior angles of pronotum rectangular; endophallus of aedeagus with more than one torsion ........................... 11
11. Both elytra and pronotum wider than long ......................................................................... L. listenbarthi Irmler, 1994 View in CoL
- Both elytra and pronotum longer than wide .............................................................................. L. lunaris Irmler, 1994 View in CoL
12. Depressions at posterior angles of pronotum deeply margined at outer side and with dense reticulation, their surface dull ............................................................................................................................................................................. 13
- Depressions at posterior angles not deeply margined at outer side, smoothly depressed, their surface not distinctly differing from surface of disc ..................................................................................................................................... 15
13. Body larger, 4.7 mm ............................................................................................................................ L. blandus View in CoL n.sp.
- Body smaller, <4 mm ................................................................................................................................................. 14
14. Sides of pronotum rounded anteriad posterior emargination, widest in middle ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 E) ........................................... ....................................................................................................................................... L. bolivianus Bernhauer, 1929 View in CoL
- Sides of pronotum more or less parallel anteriad posterior emargination, widest near front angles ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) ................. ........................................................................................................................................................... L. peruanus View in CoL n.sp.
15. Each elytron with a row of deeply impressed punctures forming more or less fine deep furrow similar to the one in L. striola View in CoL .......................................................................................................................................... L. catena Sharp, 1876 View in CoL
- Elytra without furrows, on disc of each elytron often with one or two deeper and larger setiferous punctures than normal punctation ...................................................................................................................................................... 16
16. Punctures of pronotum and elytra deep and dense, distance between punctures less than half diameter of punctures, surface shiny, sparsely covered by short undulate micro-striae................................................ L. socialis Irmler, 1994 View in CoL
- Punctures of pronotum and elytra less deep and sparser, their ground sculpture more distinct and dense, their surface only slightly shiny ...................................................................................................................................................... 17
17. Elytra with transversely reticulate ground sculpture ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 L)................................................ L lescheni Irmler, 2001 View in CoL
- Elytra with longitudinally reticulate ground sculpture ............................................................................................... 18
18. Elytra about as long as wide; abdominal tergites laterally with strigae; body smaller ≤ 3.5 mm .................................. .............................................................................................................................................. L. linearis Erichson, 1840 View in CoL
- Elytra longer than wide; abdominal tergites without strigae; body larger, 4.0– 4.3 mm ............................................. 19
19. Microsculpture of pronotum and elytra distinct and dense, their surface dull; depression at posterior angles of prono- tum flat .................................................................................................................................. L. fungicola Irmler, 2001 View in CoL
- Microsculpture of pronotum and elytra weaker, their surface shiny; depression at posterior angles of pronotum deep ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 F) .................................................................................................................... L. sinuatocollis Bernhauer, 1942 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |