Metabalta polyhastata ( Hara, 2016 ) Acosta, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4722.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1206855A-A34A-474A-AA5B-D1656C418703 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B387A5-FFDA-E01D-FCDE-0D0EFEF4FE94 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Metabalta polyhastata ( Hara, 2016 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Metabalta polyhastata ( Hara, 2016) View in CoL comb. nov.
Nanophareus polyhastatus Hara, 2016: 117 View in CoL View Cited Treatment ; Pérez-Schultheiss et al., 2019: 10. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:364BA304-56DD-4C73-9BF3-FA652B038A46
The results of the cladistic analysis ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ) demonstrated that Nanophareus polyhastatus Hara, 2016 View in CoL forms a wellsupported clade with species of Metabalta View in CoL . This relationship is underpinned α-taxonomically too, as evidenced by a close examination of the original description and illustrations of N. polyhastatus View in CoL : the exomorphological and genital features of this species ( Hara, 2016) best match the character states present in Metabalta View in CoL , as defined in Table 8 View TABLE 8 . For example, fig. 6A by Hara (2016) clearly displays pedipalp coxae with ‘normal’ appearance, i.e., not elongated as in Nanophareus View in CoL . In addition, N. polyhastatus View in CoL has a ‘normal’ development of basichelicerite and pedipap femur, and the retrolateral apical-subapical spines on tibia are placed in a bifid basal socket, not as large and furcate-tipped as in Nanophareus View in CoL ( Table 8 View TABLE 8 , chars. b, d, h). Several genital characters support the transfer of N. polyhastatus View in CoL into Metabalta View in CoL , like the sigmoid curvature of stylus, its orientation and apical narrowing, and the apical end of VPS ( Table 8 View TABLE 8 , chars. o, p, r, s); drawings of Hara (2016) are not detailed enough to see if also char. t (subapical spines on VPS shaft) applies. Based on this evidence, I hereby formally propose the new combination Metabalta polyhastata ( Hara, 2016) View in CoL comb. nov. (the original spelling polyhastatus View in CoL changed to polyhastata View in CoL to ensure the agreement in grammatical gender with the genus name Metabalta View in CoL ).
Aside, Pérez-Schultheiss et al. (2019) suggested that N. polyhastatus and Metabalta albipes Mello-Leitão, 1931 might prove to be the same. Although the latter species has no original figure available for a comparison, that of Metabalta porteri Mello-Leitão, 1936 (currently under synonymy of M. albipes , after Ringuelet 1959) looks identical to M. polyhastata , as described and drawn by Hara (2016); key similarities refer to the general apophysis pattern on femur IV, and the shape (and thickness) of apophysis of coxa IV. Until the relevant types are studied I prefer not to formalize this presumed specific synonymy. It should be noted that M. polyhastata was included by Hara (2016) in his cladistic analysis of Nanophareus , but resulted in an internal position in the genus.
Additional material examined. Metabalta efformata : Chile: Sierra de Chillán , 2 ♂ syntypes ( SMF RII 952 About SMF ) ; Metabalta geniculata : Chile: Valparaíso, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ syntypes ( SMF RII 951 About SMF ) ; Nanophareus palpalis : ‘ Chile’ , 1 ♂ lectotype, 1 ♂, 2 ♀ paralectotypes (designated by Hara et al. 2012; SMF 986 About SMF /1); Nanophareus bosqenublado : Chile: Los Molles, elev. 2 m, under succulent rock cover along coast, 9 Jan. 1985, N.I. Platnick & O.F. Francke ( AMNH) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Metabalta polyhastata ( Hara, 2016 )
Acosta, Luis E. 2020 |
Nanophareus polyhastatus Hara, 2016: 117
Perez-Schultheiss, J. & Urra, F. & Otarola, A. 2019: 10 |
Hara, M. R. 2016: 117 |