Rhodostrophia Hübner, 1823
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5519.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5F625E12-7F89-46BC-A7DF-2111180CEB87 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13935646 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B38793-FFEE-FFBF-B481-4A430A15FACA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhodostrophia Hübner, 1823 |
status |
|
Genus Rhodostrophia Hübner, 1823 View in CoL
Rhodostrophia Hübner, 1823 , Verzeichnis bekannter Schmetterlinge: 300. Type species: Phalaena calabra Petagna, 1786 .
Pellonia Duponchel, 1829 , in Godart & Duponchel, Histoire naturelle des Lépidoptères ou Papillons de France, 7 (2): 109. Type species: Phalaena vibicaria Clerck, 1759 .
Delocharis Butler, 1883 View in CoL , Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London: 172. Type species: Delocharis herbicolens Butler, 1883 View in CoL .
Apostates Warren, 1897 View in CoL , Novitates zoologicae, 4: 214.
Leptosidia Hampson, 1903 View in CoL , Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 14: 653. Type species: Leptosidia araearia Hampson, 1903 View in CoL .
Genus description ( Prout 1913; Hausmann 2004; Cui et al. 2019; Rajaei et al. 2022a)
Adults are medium to large sized with 20–40 mm wingspan; antennae filiform in female, quadripectinate in male with long branches gradually decreasing in length towards the tips [ Fig. 3a View FIGURE 3 : (i)]. Frons slightly convex or protruded. Labial palpi short, stout, forwardly or upwardly directed and hardly reaching the frons. Proboscis well developed. Foretibia with or without median epiphyses [ Fig. 3a View FIGURE 3 : (iv)]. Midtibia with paired terminal spurs. Hindtibia [ Fig. 3a View FIGURE 3 : (v)] with or without hair pencil (variable in length) at the femoro-tibial joint; a pair of terminal tibial spur and either a single or paired median spur in male while all the four spurs present in female; a single ‘pseudospur’ (of unknown function) is often present as a densely scaled, club or rod-shaped projection with rounded tip.
Forewing with two areoles [except R. solitaria (Christoph, 1887) ], vein R1 originating from the apex of 1 st areole at its junction with the 2 nd areole, veins R2–R4 stalked, arising from the apex of the 2 nd areole just above the origin of R5 ( Rajaei et al. 2022a); apex acute or falcate; outer margin obliquely straight or slightly curved; usually pale ochreous to yellow or ochreous-grey or brown with either darker, sometimes suffused or tinged with rose-red to deep rose-red transverse lines. Hindwing with Sc basally curved, Rs and M1 shortly stalked, M3 and CuA1 separate ( Rajaei et al. 2022a). Apex round; outer margin rounded, sometimes slightly protruded at M3; mostly paler than the forewing with markings more or less similar as of forewing. Underside paler and with rose-red to reddish or ochreous-grey to brown suffusion or irrorations with markings mostly similar to the upper side.
Male genitalia: Uncus elongated, slender, apically broader, setose, distal margin with a central concavity of varying depths, sometimes weekly sclerotised; the overall shape and characters diagnostic at the species level. Gnathos triangular, strongly sclerotised and medially elongated.Valva shape diagnostic, especially the characteristics of costal and distal margins; sacculus sclerotised, folded ventrad over the valva. Posterior margin of 8 th abdominal sternite bilobed and diagnostic. Aedeagus thin, elongated and curved; vesica membranous without cornuti or sometimes with small sclerotised patch having minute scobinations.
Female genitalia: Papillae anales either rounded or ovally-elongated; ductus bursae sclerotised, sometimes strongly curved or bent, length (in comparison to corpus bursae) and shape diagnostic; corpus bursae rounded or oval, often with diagnostic signum; shape of the 7 th sternite variable and diagnostic.
Immature stages: Larvae extremely long and slender; slightly tapered anteriorly with the face and sides of the head flattened; feed on low plants. Pupa slender, broadened anteriorly, and with elongated cremaster; a terminal pair of long and stout setae (D2) and three pairs of smaller and recurved setae before it ( Prout 1913; Patočka 2003).
Distribution: Palearctic (chiefly), Oriental and Neotropical regions ( Prout 1913; Suludere 1988; Ramos-González et al. 2018; Cui et al. 2019; Sihvonen et al. 2020; Rajaei et al. 2022a)
Diagnosis: Adults of Rhodostrophia and Tanaotrichia are easily distinguishable from other genera in the tribe Cyllopodini Kirby, 1892 . Both genera possess quadripectinate antennae in males and filiform in females, and they share similar basic schemes of wing venation and markings ( Fig. 3b View FIGURE 3 : FW, HW) ( Prout 1913, 1938). Rhodostrophia has forewings with an acute or slightly falcate apex, vein R1 originating from the apex of 1 st areole; and hindtibia [ Fig. 3a View FIGURE 3 : (v)] of male with either a single or paired median spur and a pair of terminal spurs. Whereas in Tanaotrichia , the forewing is comparatively broader, vein R1 originates before the apex of 2 nd areole [ Fig. 3b View FIGURE 3 : FW]; hindtibia lacks median spurs altogether, bears a single functional terminal spur accompanied by a short, stout, scaly tuft and a long, well-developed hair pencil concealing all the spurs [ Fig. 3b View FIGURE 3 : (ii)].
Male genitalia in Rhodostrophia are characterised by a long, membranous, sometimes slightly sclerotised, apically dilated and bilobed uncus; costal margin of valva curved, strongly sclerotised and ventro-distal regions distinctly modified. Corpus bursae in female genitalia with a sclerotised signum, often shaped as paired elongated sclerites. However, in Tanaotrichia , the uncus is sclerotised, somewhat flat, with a broad apex ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 34–47 ), signum in the corpus bursae of female genitalia as a double-ridged, longitudinal band-like with sclerotised scobination ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 48–62 ).
Species account
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Rhodostrophia Hübner, 1823
Kumari, Shabnam, Bandyopadhyay, Uttaran, Uniyal, Virendra Prasad, Chandra, Kailash & Hausmann, Axel 2024 |
Leptosidia
Hampson 1903 |
Leptosidia araearia
Hampson 1903 |
Apostates
Warren 1897 |
Delocharis
Butler 1883 |
Delocharis herbicolens
Butler 1883 |
Pellonia
Duponchel 1829 |
Rhodostrophia Hübner, 1823
Hubner 1823 |
Phalaena calabra
Petagna 1786 |
Phalaena vibicaria
Clerck 1759 |