Indopinnixa Manning & Morton, 1987
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5355796 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:17A3FDA4-E559-43EC-87B5-A73A2B43B490 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B30131-114E-FFB9-83B3-F9C7FBD6FAA5 |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Indopinnixa Manning & Morton, 1987 |
status |
|
Indopinnixa Manning & Morton, 1987 View in CoL
Remarks. Naruse & Maenosono (2012: 223) reviewed the status of Indopinnixa , documenting the wide range of variation in the carapace structure as well as the extent of fusion of the male abdominal somites, ranging from somites 3–6, 4–6, and only 5 and 6. They noted that the male abdominal condition in some species of Pinnixa
Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore; Email: peterng@nus.edu.sg
© National University of Singapore
ISSN 2345-7600 (electronic) | ISSN 0217-2445 (print)
White, 1846, also overlapped with that of Indopinnixa , contravening one of the supposedly diagnostic characters of the genus observed by Manning & Morton (1987); which is having male abdominal somites 5 and 6 fused. In I. shellorum , new species, male abdominal somites 4–6 are immobile, despite all the sutures between them being distinct. As has been discussed in Ng et al. (2008: 14), they should be regarded as functionally fused (see also Ng & Chia, 1994).
Naruse & Maenosono (2012) suggested that Indopinnixa will probably have to be redefined in the context of a revision of Pinnixa , which clearly contains several morphologically distinct groups. The taxonomic position of some taxa (notably I. oryza , which has an atypical male abdomen and G1 for an Indopinnixa species ) will have to re-appraised at that time.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.