Lithobius (Ezembius) sulcipes ( Stuxberg, 1876 )
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37828/em.2023.64.7 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13246888 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B2820B-FFF4-FFA9-5DED-FF58699FD3D9 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Lithobius (Ezembius) sulcipes ( Stuxberg, 1876 ) |
| status |
|
17. Lithobius (Ezembius) sulcipes ( Stuxberg, 1876) View in CoL
Type locality (of lectotype): “north of Worogowa ” ( Eason 1976) .
Lithobius sulcipes Stuxberg 1876: 308 View in CoL ; 1877: 20.
Lithobius sulcipes View in CoL – Zalesskaja 1978: 126.
Lithobius bogdoulensis Loksa 1965: 207 (3♂♂, 5 ♀♀, 4 juv.); 1978: 111 (11 ♂♂, 8 ♀♀).
Lithobius bogdoulensis – Eason 1976: 104; Ulykpan 1988: 221.
Lithobius formicarum – Eason 1976: 108; Zalesskaja 1978: 126.
Previous records. Ulaanbaatar: [UL3]; Bulgan: [BU1] and [BU3] ( Loksa 1965, 1978, as L. bogdoulensis ) aimags.
Distribution. Russia: Eastern Siberia ( Zalesskaja 1978) and Eastern Kazakhstan ( Dyachkov et al. 2022a).
Remarks. L. bogdoulensis was synonymized under L. sulcipes by Eason (1976); later, Bonato et al. (2016) regarded L. sulcipes as junior synonym of L. rapax Meinert, 1872 ; probable but uncertain synonymy.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Lithobius (Ezembius) sulcipes ( Stuxberg, 1876 )
| Dyachkov, Yurii V. & Farzalieva, Gyulli Sh. 2023 |
Lithobius sulcipes
| Zalesskaja, N. T. 1978: 126 |
Lithobius bogdoulensis
| Ulykpan, K. 1988: 221 |
| Eason, E. H. 1976: 104 |
Lithobius formicarum
| Zalesskaja, N. T. 1978: 126 |
| Eason, E. H. 1976: 108 |
Lithobius bogdoulensis
| Loksa, I. 1965: 207 |
Lithobius sulcipes
| Stuxberg, A. 1877: 20 |
| Stuxberg, A. 1876: 308 |